Association between Lifetime Classic Psychedelic Use and Sick Leave in a Population-Based Sample
Using representative US survey data (N = 407,717), the study found that lifetime use of classic psychedelics was significantly associated with lower sick leave in the past 30 days (B = −0.09, p < 0.01) after adjusting for sociodemographic and behavioural factors. The authors suggest psychedelics could potentially reduce sick leave and related costs, but stress that causal pathways and mechanisms need further investigation.
Authors
- Otto Simonsson
Published
Abstract
Objectives
Absenteeism from work due to illness, and related costs, has increased steadily during the past decades. In recent years, there has been a reemergence of research on the therapeutic effects of classic psychedelics showing associations with both physical and mental health. However, the association between classic psychedelics and sick leave remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between lifetime classic psychedelic use and sick leave in the past 30 days among adults in the United States (N = 407,717), using data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2005–2019), weighted to be representative of the US adult population.
Methods
The primary analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, risky behavior, and use of other substances.
Results
There was a significant and negative association between lifetime classic psychedelic use and sick leave in the past 30 days (B = −0.09, p < 0.01) when adjusting for all control variables.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that classic psychedelics could potentially lead to reduced sick leave and associated costs in the general population, but more research is needed to investigate potential causal pathways of classic psychedelics on sick leave and evaluate possible mechanisms.
Research Summary of 'Association between Lifetime Classic Psychedelic Use and Sick Leave in a Population-Based Sample'
Introduction
Hypertension prevalence and associated costs are increasing globally, driven by multiple modifiable risk factors such as smoking, poor diet, physical inactivity and alcohol use, together with psychosocial contributors including chronic stress, depression and anxiety. Recent work has also implicated low-grade inflammation and serotonergic system alterations in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Although classic psychedelics (serotonin 2A receptor agonists) have been studied primarily for mental health outcomes over the past two decades, emerging evidence suggests these compounds can produce persistent changes in behaviour and mental state that may indirectly affect cardiovascular risk factors, and they may also have immunomodulatory or anti-inflammatory effects relevant to blood pressure regulation. Simonsson and colleagues set out to examine whether lifetime use of classic psychedelics is associated with lower odds of having been told by a medical professional that one had hypertension in the past 12 months. Building on prior population findings that therapeutic associations may differ across psychedelic classes, the investigators also tested whether associations varied by the three main classes of classic psychedelics — tryptamines (DMT, ayahuasca, psilocybin), lysergamides (LSD), and phenethylamines (mescaline, peyote, San Pedro). The authors hypothesised that lifetime classic psychedelic use would be associated with lower odds of recent hypertension, and that tryptamine use would show the strongest association.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Topics
- Author
- APA Citation
Mellner, C., Dahlen, M., & Simonsson, O. (2022). Association between Lifetime Classic Psychedelic Use and Sick Leave in a Population-Based Sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811353
References (16)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, &. M., Day, C. M. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Watts, R., Day, C. M., Krzanowski, J. et al. · Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2017)
Szabo, A. · Frontiers in Immunology (2015)
Luoma, J. B., Chwyl, C., Bathje, G. J. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2020)
Nichols, D. E., Grob, C. S. · Forensic Science International (2018)
Rucker, J., Iliff, J., Nutt, D. J. · Neuropharmacology (2017)
Flanagan, T. W., Nichols, C. D. · International Review of Psychiatry (2018)
Dos Santos, R. G., Bouso, J. C., Hallak, J. E. · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (2018)
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Ley, L. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Show all 16 referencesShow fewer
Hendricks, P. S., Crawford, M. S., Cropsey, K. L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Hendricks, P. S., Thorne, C. B., Clark, B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Davis, A. K., Fire Erowid et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Ona, G., Kohek, M., Massaguer, T. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2019)
Frecska, E., Bokor, P., Winkelman, M. J. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2016)
Thompson, C., Szabo, A. · Immunology Letters (2020)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.