Negative affective bias in depression following treatment with psilocybin or escitalopram - a secondary analysis from a randomized trial
In a double-blind randomised trial of patients with long-standing moderate-to-severe depression, two doses of psilocybin plus placebo and six weeks of escitalopram produced comparable reductions in negative affective bias on a facial emotion recognition task at the six-week endpoint. Changes in bias were not associated with concurrent symptom change, although improved recognition of positive faces predicted symptom improvement at week 10 only in the escitalopram group, suggesting partially overlapping but distinct cognitive mechanisms.
Authors
- Martens, M. A. G.
- Cunha, B. G.
- Erritzoe, D.
Published
Abstract
Recent clinical trial data suggests that ratings on depression scales are lowered after psilocybin therapy compared to placebo, though it is unclear what neuropsychological mechanisms underpin these effects. This study compared psilocybin, with an established antidepressant, escitalopram, to investigate whether there are shared or distinct effects on emotional information processing. Patients with long-standing moderate-to-severe depression were randomly and double-blindly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1) two doses of 25 mg of psilocybin, 3-weeks apart, plus 6-weeks of daily placebo (psilocybin group N = 30); or 2) two doses of 1 mg of psilocybin 3-weeks apart plus 6-weeks of daily oral escitalopram (escitalopram group N = 29); all patients received the same psychological support. Behavioural measures of affective bias as well as subjective measures of depression were collected at baseline and at the primary 6-week endpoint, using an established computerised task (Facial Emotion Recognition Task) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, respectively. Change in affective bias was further correlated with change in depression scores measured concurrently as well as at 1-month post-trial follow-up (week-10), corrected for baseline depression severity. Negative bias in facial expression recognition decreased after both treatments to a comparable level. Concurrently, change in negative affective bias was not associated with change in depression. Longitudinally, a decrease in the misclassification of positive faces as negative was associated with a decrease in depression scores at week-10 for the escitalopram group only. Therefore, a more positive behavioural bias in emotional processing was seen following psilocybin and citalopram compared to baseline. This highlights the potential for at least some overlap in cognitive mechanisms across two distinct treatments, which is noteworthy given the short dosing regimen with psilocybin.
Research Summary of 'Negative affective bias in depression following treatment with psilocybin or escitalopram - a secondary analysis from a randomized trial'
Introduction
The authors situate the study against persistent shortcomings of current antidepressant strategies, notably selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs): partial efficacy, adverse effects and relatively slow onset of action. There is increasing interest in psychedelic compounds such as psilocybin — a 5-HT2A receptor agonist — which have shown promise in recent trials for producing relatively rapid antidepressant effects. However, the neuropsychological mechanisms by which psilocybin might reduce depressive symptoms are unclear, and it is not established whether these mechanisms overlap with those of conventional antidepressants such as escitalopram. G. and colleagues set out to compare psilocybin and escitalopram with respect to effects on emotional information processing, using an experimental medicine framework that views early shifts in emotional bias (the relative processing of positive versus negative emotional information) as a potential common mechanism of antidepressant action. Specifically, the study tested whether two doses of psilocybin plus placebo or a low psilocybin dose plus 6 weeks of escitalopram would produce a more positive behavioural bias on the Facial Emotion Recognition Task (FERT), and whether changes in that bias related to clinical change in depressive symptoms over the trial and at one-month follow-up.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topic
- APA Citation
Martens, M. A. G., Cunha, B. G., Erritzoe, D., Nutt, D., Carhart-Harris, R., & Harmer, C. J. (2025). Negative affective bias in depression following treatment with psilocybin or escitalopram - a secondary analysis from a randomized trial. Translational Psychiatry, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03693-w
References (20)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Nutt, D. J., Erritzoe, D., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Cell (2020)
Daws, R. E., Timmermann, C., Giribaldi, B. et al. · Nature Medicine (2022)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Haikazian, S., Chen-Li, D., Johnson, D. et al. · Psychiatry Research (2023)
Szigeti, B., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. et al. · Scientific Reports (2023)
Wall, M. B., Demetriou, L., Giribaldi, B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2025)
Show all 20 referencesShow fewer
Nayak, S. M., Bari, B. A., Yaden, D. B. et al. · Psychedelic Medicine (2023)
Doss, M. K., Považan, M., Rosenberg, M. D. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2021)
Stroud, J., Freeman, T. P., Leech, R. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Shanahan, M. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2014)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Bolstridge, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2017)
Tagliazucchi, E., Roseman, L., Kaelen, M. et al. · Current Biology (2016)
Watts, R., Day, C. M., Krzanowski, J. et al. · Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2017)
Haarsma, J., Harmer, C. J., Tamm, S. · Brain and Neuroscience Advances (2021)
Kwan, A. C., Olson, D. E., Preller, K. H. et al. · Nature Medicine (2022)
Szigeti, B., Weiss, B., Rosas, F. E. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2024)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.