In a small open‑label trial of 10 patients with chronic cluster headache, three oral doses of psilocybin (0.14 mg/kg) were well tolerated and produced a mean 31 per cent reduction in attack frequency, with one patient achieving 21 weeks' remission. Changes in hypothalamic–diencephalic functional connectivity on fMRI correlated strongly with attack reduction (R = −0.81), implicating hypothalamic circuits in the therapeutic response and supporting further clinical study.
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Schindler, E. A. D., Gottschalk, C. H., Weil, M. J. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2015)
Objective
To evaluate the feasibility and prophylactic effect of psilocybin as well as its effects on hypothalamic functional connectivity (FC) in patients with chronic cluster headache (CCH).
Background
CCH is an excruciating and difficult‐to‐treat disorder with incompletely understood pathophysiology, although hypothalamic dysfunction has been implicated. Psilocybin may have beneficial prophylactic effects, but clinical evidence is limited.
Methods
In this small open‐label clinical trial, 10 patients with CCH were included and maintained headache diaries for 10 weeks. Patients received three doses of peroral psilocybin (0.14 mg/kg) on the first day of weeks five, six, and seven. The first 4 weeks served as baseline and the last 4 weeks as follow‐up. Hypothalamic FC was determined using functional magnetic resonance imaging the day before the first psilocybin dose and 1 week after the last dose.
Results
The treatment was well tolerated. Attack frequency was reduced by mean (standard deviation) 31% (31) from baseline to follow‐up ( p FWER = 0.008). One patient experienced 21 weeks of complete remission. Changes in hypothalamic–diencephalic FC correlated negatively with a percent change in attack frequency ( p FWER = 0.03, R = −0.81), implicating this neural pathway in treatment response.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that psilocybin may have prophylactic potential and implicates the hypothalamus in possible treatment response. Further clinical studies are warranted.
Cluster headache is described as one of the most painful conditions, affecting about 0.1% of the population, with chronic cluster headache (CCH) representing the more persistent form. Although established prophylactic options such as verapamil, lithium, CGRP antibodies, and transitional treatments can help many patients, these approaches may be insufficient or poorly tolerated in CCH. The paper notes that earlier observational reports and a recent clinical trial suggested that serotonin 2A receptor agonists, including psilocybin, might reduce cluster headache attacks, but prospective evidence on safety, efficacy, and mechanism remained limited. Hypothalamic dysfunction has also been implicated in cluster headache, but how it relates to treatment response is uncertain. Madsen and colleagues therefore set out to evaluate the feasibility and prophylactic effect of psilocybin in patients with CCH, and to examine whether any clinical response was associated with changes in hypothalamic functional connectivity measured with functional MRI. The researchers hypothesised that attack frequency would decrease after psilocybin and that this change would correlate with changes in hypothalamic connectivity. The study was also intended to explore whether hypothalamic-diencephalic pathways might be relevant to treatment response.
This was a small open-label clinical trial conducted at the Danish Headache Center, Glostrup Hospital, Denmark. Ten patients completed the study analysis, although 11 were initially included. Participants were adults aged 18–65 years with a verified diagnosis of CCH, the ability to distinguish cluster headache attacks from other headache types, and at least four attacks per week during the 4 weeks before enrolment. The researchers excluded patients with prior serotonergic hallucinogen use for cluster headache, recent trial participation, recent prophylactic cluster headache medication, contraindicated concomitant drugs, other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, significant allergy history, major medical or psychiatric conditions, manic or psychotic disorders, current substance use disorder, MRI contraindications, pregnancy or breastfeeding, inadequate contraception when relevant, and recent stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertension, or clinically significant arrhythmia. After informed consent and screening, participants underwent medical, neurological, psychiatric, laboratory, and ECG assessment. The treatment consisted of three oral doses of psilocybin, each 0.14 mg/kg, given on the first day of weeks five, six, and seven. The first 4 weeks served as baseline and the last 4 weeks as follow-up. Treatment was preceded by preparation sessions aimed at establishing rapport and exploring expectations, motivations, life history, and previous altered states of consciousness. Psilocybin was administered as COMP360 capsules/tablets, and participants were asked to minimise food and caffeine intake on treatment mornings and keep intake standardised across dosing days. Blood pressure was measured before dosing and repeatedly for 4 hours afterwards. On the first treatment day only, blood was sampled before psilocybin and at multiple time points up to 240 minutes afterwards for plasma psilocin measurement by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Structural and functional MRI were acquired on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner. Imaging analysis included standard preprocessing in SPM12 and functional connectivity analysis in CONN, with band-pass filtering from 0.008 Hz to 0.09 Hz. The main clinical outcome was change in weekly cluster headache attack frequency from baseline to follow-up. The paper also reports exploratory analyses of hypothalamic connectivity and, post hoc, seven large-scale functional networks. The extracted text indicates that statistical testing included correction for multiple comparisons, but some details of the analysis pipeline are not fully visible in the extraction.
Ten patients (mean age [standard deviation (SD)]; median [25th, 75th] = 49.4 [12.9]; 54.5 [39.4, 58.1], five females) with a verified diagnosis of CCH were recruited from Danish Headache Center, Glostrup Hospital, Denmark (Table) and completed the present open-label study. All patients were thoroughly informed about the study, including possible effects and side effects of psilocybin including physiological changes (e.g., blood pressure increases) and psychedelic effects. After giving written informed consent, all patients underwent a medical examination, including neurological and somatic examination, blood screening panel for common biomarkers, electrocardiogram, and a screening for present and past psychiatric disorders using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Danish Translation, version 6.0.0.Eleven patients were included in the study (Figure). Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18-65 years, (2) a diagnosis of CCH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition,(3) ability to separate CH attacks from other types of headache, and (4) a history of at least four attacks per week in the last 4 weeks before inclusion. Exclusion criteria were: (1) a history of using a serotonergic hallucinogen for CH, (2) participation in any clinical trials within 30 days preceding study enrollment, (3) use of other prophylactic CH medication within the last 2 weeks, (4) current use of drugs suspected to interfere with treatment (e.g., antipsychotic medication) or to be hazardous in combination with psilocybin, (5) presence of other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias than CH, (6) known hypersensitivity or allergy to multiple drugs (including psilocybin), (7) a history of or current medical or psychiatric condition that might render participation unsuitable, (8) present or previous manic or psychotic disorder or critical psychiatric disorder, (9) current substance use disorder, (10) MRI contraindications, (11) pregnancy or breastfeeding, () not using safe contraception (if fertile woman), () stroke (<1 year from inclusion), () myocardial infarction (<1 year from inclusion), () hypertension (>140/90 mmHg at inclusion), and () clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia (<1 year from inclusion). The study was approved by the ethics committee for the cap- months to obtain information of potential remission duration and perception of the psilocybin treatment (Table). | 57
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Madsen, M. K., Stenbaek, D. S., Arvidsson, A. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Stenbæk, D. S. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Ly, C., Greb, A. C., Cameron, L. P. et al. · Cell Reports (2018)
Vargas, M. V., Dunlap, L. E., Dong, C. et al. · Science (2023)
Roseman, L., Leech, R., Feilding, A. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2014)
Karst, M., Halpern, J. H., Bernateck, M. et al. · Cephalalgia (2010)
Müller, F., Mühlhauser, M., Holze, F. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2020)
Kaplan, A. L., Confair, D. N., Kim, K. et al. · Nature (2022)
Nichols, C. D., Nichols, D. E., Johnson, M. W. · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2016)
Van Amsterdam, J., Opperhuizen, A., Van Den Brink, W. · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (2011)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Brendstrup-Brix, K., Ozenne, B., Fisher, P. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2026)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Naudé, G. P., Rebman, A. W. et al. · Scientific Reports (2026)
Schindler, E. A. D., Gottschalk, C. H., Pittman, B. P. et al. · Headache (2025)
Johansen, A., Plavén-Sigray, P., Madsen, M. K. et al. · Research Square (2025)
Rucker, J., Butler, M., Hambleton, S. et al. · Headache (2024)
Nine patients completed all three psilocybin treatments; one patient missed the third dose for logistical reasons but completed the rest of the study. The dosing regimen was described as well tolerated, with no serious adverse reactions reported. Acute subjective psychedelic effects varied between participants, and the researchers noted no meaningful blood pressure changes. One patient reported no subjective psychedelic effects and also showed the lowest maximum plasma psilocin level. Another patient reported beneficial psychological effects lasting at least 6 months. The primary clinical finding was a statistically significant reduction in attack frequency from baseline to follow-up. The extracted text states that headache frequency was reduced, and elsewhere specifies a mean reduction of 31% (SD 31), with p FWER = 0.008. The summary fragment from the results section also indicates that average attack duration was assessed, but the extracted text does not clearly report a definitive statistical outcome for duration. One patient experienced complete remission lasting 21 weeks, and the paper also notes that one patient had a 22% reduction in attack frequency despite no clear psychedelic effects. In the neuroimaging results, the researchers found three clusters with significant positive functional connectivity to the hypothalamic seed across baseline and follow-up scans: a large diencephalic cluster including the hypothalamus, thalamus, caudate, and brain stem; a cluster in the left lingual gyrus; and a cluster in the right cerebellum. One cluster in occipito-temporal white matter showed negative functional connectivity. The key association was a negative correlation between the percent reduction in attack frequency and changes in hypothalamic-diencephalic connectivity, with p FWER = 0.03 and R = -0.81, meaning that larger increases in this connectivity were associated with larger reductions in attacks. By contrast, the exploratory network-level analysis did not show statistically significant baseline-to-follow-up changes in within- or between-network connectivity across the seven tested networks, and no significant associations were found between percentage change in headache frequency and network connectivity changes. The paper also reports substantial interindividual variability in plasma psilocin levels, but the extracted text does not clearly present a full dose-response analysis.
The authors interpret the study as preliminary evidence that psilocybin may have prophylactic potential in chronic cluster headache and that the hypothalamus, particularly hypothalamic-diencephalic circuitry, may be involved in treatment response. They argue that the observed reduction in attack frequency, together with the correlation between clinical improvement and changes in hypothalamic connectivity, supports a possible role for this neural pathway. They also suggest that the benefit may not depend entirely on acute psychedelic effects, because one patient without clear subjective psychoactive effects still showed a reduction in attacks. In relation to earlier research, the authors note that their findings are broadly consistent with prior observational reports and a recent small placebo-controlled trial that also suggested benefit in chronic cluster headache. They compare the average reduction in attacks in their study with that previously reported and state that the results together support the need for larger trials. They also discuss earlier neuroimaging work indicating altered hypothalamic-diencephalic connectivity in cluster headache, which they believe aligns with their findings. The paper emphasises several limitations. The sample was very small, making the findings exploratory. Participants were treatment-refractory and recruited from a tertiary headache centre, which may limit generalisability. Prophylactic medication was not allowed, so the findings may not apply to patients taking standard preventive therapy. The authors also note that they used a fixed body-weight-based dose and that higher doses might produce different effects. The extracted text cuts off before the end of the limitations discussion, so additional limitations may have been present but are not visible here. In terms of implications, the authors caution that the results are preliminary and advise against self-medication with psychedelics, noting that psilocybin remains illegal in most countries and can cause harm in uncontrolled settings. They suggest that psilocybin, or potentially non-psychedelic 5-HT2A receptor agonists, could become useful for CCH or other chronic pain conditions, but only after further research establishes safety, efficacy, and mechanisms more firmly.
The overall aim of preparation was to build a safe alliance between the facilitators and the patients, and prepare the patient for the intervention. During preparation, facilitators explored the patient's expectations and motivations for undergoing the treatment and inquired about the patient's personal history including major life events and any previous experience with altered states of consciousness. Psilocybin dose was determined according to body weight at inclusion (0.14 mg psilocybin per kg bodyweight), using 1 and 5 mg capsules/tablets (COMP360, COMPASS Pathways' proprietary pharmaceutical-grade synthetic psilocybin formulation that has been optimized for stability and purity). The 0.14 mg/kg dose and pulse treatment regimen were determined based on both patient accounts that low to moderate psilocybin doses spaced by 4-7 days is effectiveand our previous 5-HT 2A R positron emission tomography occupancy study, which indicated that a dose of 0.14 mg/kg produces high psilocin occupancy at cerebral 5-HT 2A Rs while still having limited psychoactive effects.Patients were asked to limit to a minimum the intake of food and caffeine on the morning of all treatment days and were asked to standardize their food intake across all three treatment days. Sessions were conducted at the hospital TA B L E 1 Characteristics of study patients and reported adverse events.
Blood pressure was measured immediately prior to psilocybin administration and at 40, 80, 120, 180, and 240 min after drug administration, using an electronic blood pressure measurement device (Omron M3 Comfort, Kyoto, Japan).
Blood samples were collected on the first treatment day only prior to psilocybin intake and 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, and 240 min after drug. Blood samples were always obtained after blood pressure measurement. Plasma psilocin level (PPL) was determined using ultra high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry, as previously describedwith minor changes. The transition of the internal standard psilocin-d10 was m/z 215 → 65.8 with collision energy of 14 eV corresponding to the quantitative transition of psilocin. The reconstitution mixture after precipitation and evaporation were added 1 mM ascorbic acid.
Structural and functional MRI data were acquired using a 32-channel head coil on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI data were obtained using a T2*-weighted gradient echo-planar imaging sequence
BOLD image preprocessing was performed in SPM12 (. fil. ion. ucl. ac. uk/ spm), including unwarping using B0 field-maps, realignment, coregistration, segmentation of structural image, and normalization to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, and smoothing with an 8 mm Gaussian kernel, as described previously. 17
Denoising was performed using CONN (v17c) as previously describedand included band-pass filtering (0.008 Hz to 0.09 Hz), TA B L E 2 Patient comments about drug administration and therapeutic effects.
1 Good experiences all three. Each time I had been there, it seemed the effect waned. Not something I feel like going to do for regular treatment. I did not like the loss of control and therefore do not want to do it again. I did not feel bad after, no bad after effects. I can relive the experience by listening to music, see colors for my inner eye. Wouldn't take it at home, but would like to take it under controlled conditions 2 I had two good experiences and one experience that was sort of scary. But I felt well taken care of. But the experiences would not deter me from doing it again. I guess that it is a treatment that would have to be repeated. If it were possible, I would try it again
An exploratory networks analysis was conducted using FC estimates within and between seven networks (default mode, ventral attention, dorsal attention, fronto-parietal control, visual, limbic, and somatomotor), which were delineated using Schaefer's 400-region parcellation of the Yeo atlas.The test-retest reliability of FC fMRI analysis is generally low but depends on outcome measure and analysis choices.Statistical analysis
The primary outcome was change in CH attack frequency per week (BL vs. FU). In the event of multiple headache diary data entries per date,
We also explored a possible dose-response relation of maximum | 61
Nine patients completed all three psilocybin treatments; due to logistical issues, one patient was unable to attend the third treatment but completed the rest of the study. The dosing regime was well tolerated by all patients, and we observed no serious adverse reactions (Tablesand). One patient (Patient 5) reported beneficial long-lasting psychological effects, lasting at least 6 months (Table). Psilocybin induced variable acute subjective psychoactive effects (Figure) and not associated with changes in blood pressure (Figure). Interestingly, one patient (Patient 6) reported complete absence of psychoactive effects of psilocybin. Objective effects of psilocybin (e.g., dilated pupils) were also imperceptible to the staff. This patient displayed the lowest C max PPL of all patients (5.9 μg/L).
The primary analysis was prophylactic effects of psilocybin and was evaluated by comparing the 4-week BL to the 4-week FU. We observed a statistically significant reduction in headache frequency , p uncorrected = 0.07). Self-reported average daily CH attack duration is visualized in Figure.
After analyzing prophylactic effects, we investigated effects on hypothalamic FC. Three clusters showed significant positive FC with the hypothalamic seed across BL and FU scans: (1) a large diencephalic cluster encompassing the hypothalamus, thalamus, caudate, and brain; (2) a cluster in the left lingual gyrus; and (3) a cluster in the right cerebellum (Table). One cluster showed negative FC: a cluster in occipito-temporal white matter. Linear regression analysis
The exploratory post hoc network FC analysis did not show statistically significant changes (BL vs. FU). Also, we observed no significant associations between percent change in headache frequency and changes in network FC (Figure).
We observed substantial interindividual variability in PPL (Figure): | 63 headache treatments, such as DHE or steroid pulses or occipital nerve blocks.We observed a negative correlation between percent reduction in attack frequency and FC changes between the hypothalamic seed and a large diencephalic cluster (Figure). Hypothalamic dysfunction is a prime candidate for pathophysiological involvement in CH, as supported by several neuroimaging studies.Increased hypothalamic-diencephalic FC in patients with CCH has previously been observed, and the authors speculated that this signified an imbalance between the orexin/hypocretin system in the hypothalamus and dopaminergic pathways in diencephalon.Although we are unable to measure direct alterations in dopamine or orexin neurotransmission, our data support modulation of hypothalamic-diencephalic neuronal pathways in psilocybin-induced treatment response to psilocybin. Although our results are intriguing, the present sample size was small and more studies are needed to confirm this finding. Psilocybin acutely alters the brain's normal functional architecture, including reduced functional integrity of individual functional networks (i.e., reduced FC), increased FC between networks, and increased thalamic FC.neuroplasticity after psilocybin, including increased dendritic spines and synaptic density as observed in preclinical studies.We speculate that a recalibration of aberrant hypothalamic-diencephalic neuronal pathways, supported by increased neuroplasticity, may underlie part of psilocybin's prophylactic potential in CH. We conducted a post hoc exploratory networks analysis, evaluating FC changes within and between seven networks (BL vs. FU). We also assessed associations of percent headache frequency change with network FC changes. Previous studies found higher FC in the fronto-parietal control network in out-of-bout ECH patients relative to healthy controls 34 and wide-spread FC alterations within networks comparing patients with ECH to healthy controls.Acutely, psilocybin reduces FC within and increases FC between networks in healthy individuals.Our study design did not allow for a direct comparison with previous studies; however, we did not observe evidence for substantial protracted effects of psilocybin on network FC, indicating that alterations in cortical networks may not be important for therapeutic effects of psilocybin in CCH. A recently published small exploratory placebo-controlled trial showed a large effect size (d = 1.25) in patients with CCH (n = 8).The reduction in CCH attacks were 2.8 per week, which is comparable to the average reduction of 3.6 attacks per week we observed. Together these findings suggest that larger trials are warranted to evaluate prophylactic effects. Interestingly, one patient in our study reported no subjective psychoactive effects and did not show expected signs of psilocybin (e.g., dilated pupils). We did not identify potential medications likely to alter the response to psilocybin (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics, | 65 H EAD ACH E etc.) in this person or the other patients. Although this patient displayed the lowest level of PPL, consistent with limited effects, we have previously observed psychoactive effects at this PPL in healthy individuals.Interestingly, the patient displayed a reduction in headache frequency of 22% from BL to the FU, indicating a possible prophylactic effect even in the absence of psychoactive effects. This is also supported by a previous study on the non-psychedelic lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) analogue 2-bromo-LSD (also known as BOL-148) that showed promising clinical effects in a small openlabel studyand case reports in patients with depression.More generally, this supports the idea that it may be possible to induce clinically beneficial effects using non-psychedelic 5-HT 2A R agonists, which some researchers are actively pursuing.Importantly, one patient (Patient 5) reported substantially enhanced quality of life despite long-term unchanged headache burden (Table). This is consistent with long-lasting subjective psychological benefits in both patients and healthy individuals.It is possible that psilocybin treatment could modulate both the disease burden itself, and in the proper context, the psychological response to the disease burden. Thus, psilocybin therapy may constitute a valuable intervention in patients with CCH or other chronic pain conditions. Although psilocybin overall has a favorable safety profile,it is important to emphasize that psilocybin has potent psychedelic properties, is illegal in most countries, and that serious negative healthrelated outcomes have been observed in non-clinical settings due to poorly regulated behavior.Thus, we caution that our results are preliminary and advise that patients abstain from self-medicating with psychedelics. Our study is not without limitations. Our original aim of including The included patients were relatively treatment refractory to standard prophylactic treatment and recruited from a tertiary headache center; this may limit the generalizability to other CH patients. Intake of prophylactic medication was not allowed in our trial and it is also possible that our results do not generalize to patients on regular prophylactic agents. We used a fixed dose, which was relative to body weight; however, it is possible that further treatment effect occurs at a higher dose. In