Psychedelics relax predictive processing in the post-acute period by remodeling cortico-cortical feedback circuits
This observational study examined people (n=47) who had recently used psilocybin, LSD or 5-MeO-DMT, and mice given psilocybin, to see whether psychedelics alter predictive processing after the acute effects wear off. It found reduced top-down control of sensory processing in both humans and mice, linked in mice to changes in feedback circuits and new spine growth in prefrontal neurons.
Abstract
Serotonergic psychedelics (e.g., psilocybin, LSD) have potential to treat psychiatric disorders, with therapeutic effects lasting days to weeks after a single dose. Prominent theories suggest that psychedelics have a lasting effect on hierarchical brain circuits, reducing top-down influence on information processing to facilitate an unbiased, bottom-up reassessment of the world, but direct and concrete evidence for such an effect is lacking. Here we directly tested this hypothesis in both humans and mice, assessing predictive processing in the fronto-visual system in the days after a single psychedelic exposure. Individuals who recently (<3 weeks) used 5-HT 2A Receptor agonist psychedelics (psilocybin, LSD) were assessed via electroencephalography (EEG) and electrooculography recordings during a saccadic prediction task and compared to age- and sex-matched non-users. Compared to non-users, recent psychedelic users produced fewer fast saccades and less suppression of EEG delta/theta power to predictively presented stimuli, pointing to a disruption of predictive processing. These changes correlated with time since psychedelic use and were replicated in a second cohort taking a different serotonergic psychedelic (5-MeO-DMT). Direct recordings of primary visual cortex (V1) in mice administered psilocybin (1 mg/kg) evinced a similar loss of predictive suppression 24-hrs after the dose. This coincided with weakened top-down modulation of V1 from anterior cingulate area (ACa), a subregion of medial prefrontal cortex, along with clear spine growth in ACa neurons that project to V1. These results suggest that psychedelic-induced neural plasticity serves to reorganize feedback circuits in the cortex and relax top-down influence on bottom-up sensory processing – an effect that persists beyond the acute exposure period and may underlie a therapeutic window.
Research Summary of 'Psychedelics relax predictive processing in the post-acute period by remodeling cortico-cortical feedback circuits'
βBlossom's Take
Introduction
Serotonergic psychedelics such as psilocybin, LSD and 5-MeO-DMT are of growing interest because they may produce therapeutic effects that last days to weeks after a single dose. Earlier research had already shown that these drugs can induce structural plasticity in medial prefrontal cortex, including dendritic spine growth, but it remained unclear what those changes mean for circuit function after the acute drug experience has passed. In particular, the authors note that existing work had not directly linked psychedelic-induced plasticity to a lasting change in hierarchical predictive processing, especially in a way that could be studied in both humans and animals. West and colleagues set out to test whether recent psychedelic exposure relaxes predictive processing by weakening top-down cortical influence on sensory processing. Using a translational visual predictive-processing paradigm in humans and mice, they asked whether recent use of serotonergic psychedelics would reduce context-dependent suppression of responses to predictable stimuli, and whether this would be accompanied by changes in cortico-cortical feedback circuits and spine plasticity in mice. The study was designed to examine the post-acute period, rather than the acute psychedelic state, so that any observed effects would be more relevant to longer-lasting neurobiological change.
Methods
The study combined human behavioural/EEG experiments with mouse electrophysiology and histology. In humans, the researchers recruited adults from university advertising, social media and local psychedelic community groups. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and did not have autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, current major depressive episodes or substance abuse other than nicotine. The main human sample comprised 47 individuals: 16 controls with no recent psychedelic use, and 31 recent users. Within the psychedelic-exposed participants, 16 had recently taken psilocybin or LSD within 21 days, and 12 had recently inhaled Incilius alvarius toad toxin, which the authors treated as a 5-MeO-DMT source. Dosage could not be directly verified, though participants were screened to exclude only sub-perceptual microdoses. Human participants completed a saccadic prediction task in a dark room while eye movements were recorded with electrooculography and cortical activity with 32-channel EEG. The task involved repeated predictable stimulus locations, unexpected deviant locations, and deviant trials that either did or did not require updating expectations. Participants completed two runs, and the researchers also analysed a passive visual oddball EEG task in the same cohort. EEG data were processed in the time-frequency domain, with analyses focused on early and late post-stimulus windows and on conventional frequency bands, especially delta and theta. The authors also examined inter-trial phase locking, which indexes how consistently neural activity aligns to stimulus onset across trials. Group comparisons used mixed ANOVAs, with follow-up tests for significant interactions. In mice, the authors administered psilocybin (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) or saline to awake head-fixed animals and examined visual predictive processing 24 hours later, in the post-acute period. Local field potentials were recorded from primary visual cortex (V1), and in some animals also from anterior cingulate area (ACa), using standard oddball and global-local oddball paradigms. These paradigms were designed to separate local deviance detection from broader context-based predictive suppression. The researchers focused on early post-stimulus activity, especially delta-theta bands, and used non-parametric Granger causality analyses to assess directionality of connectivity between ACa and V1. They also used retrograde labelling to identify ACa neurons projecting to V1 and quantified dendritic spine density and volume with confocal imaging and automated analysis. Mouse statistics were modelled with linear mixed-effects approaches, with mouse as a random effect and sex included as a covariate or fixed effect as appropriate.
Results
In the human psilocybin/LSD cohort, recent psychedelic users differed from controls on the saccadic prediction task in ways consistent with reduced predictive modulation. Although both groups generally made faster saccades to predictable than to unexpected targets, controls showed a marked enrichment of very fast express saccades to predictable locations, whereas recent psychedelic users did not. The proportion of express saccades to predictable targets was lower in the psychedelic group than in controls (10.5% versus 4.3%; t(30)=4.29, p=0.0002), while no group difference was seen for deviant locations. The difference in express saccades to predictable targets correlated with time since last psychedelic use (r=0.532, p=0.033), suggesting recovery towards typical predictive control over time. By contrast, measures of slower updating after deviant trials were broadly similar between groups, and both groups showed the expected slowing after the “no update” deviant, indicating intact behavioural updating. EEG results matched the behavioural findings. In controls, predictable visual targets elicited stronger early delta and theta responses and greater phase locking differences than deviant targets, consistent with predictive suppression of early sensory processing. Recent psychedelic users did not show this early location-dependent suppression. The key group-by-location interaction was present in the early window for delta power and theta power, and also for early delta phase locking, but not in later time windows. Late delta and theta responses to deviant stimuli were present in both groups, suggesting that later deviance detection or prediction-error-related activity remained intact. The magnitude of early phase locking to predictable stimuli was inversely correlated with days since last psychedelic use (r=-0.670, p=0.0045). No reliable effects of update type were found in the EEG analyses. A second human cohort who had recently taken 5-MeO-DMT showed a similar pattern. Compared with controls, they also showed fewer express saccades to predictable locations and altered early delta power and phase locking, again without evidence that late processing of deviance or behavioural updating was disrupted. The authors report that these effects were present regardless of sex or age. In mice, psilocybin produced a similar post-acute effect in V1. Twenty-four hours after dosing, saline-treated mice showed the expected context dependence: responses to a deviant orientation were enhanced in the standard oddball, but suppressed in the global-local paradigm when the same stimulus was globally predictable. After psilocybin, mice still showed deviance detection, but this was no longer modulated by global context in the same way. In other words, the suppressive effect of predictive context was lost, while basic response to unexpected stimuli remained. The authors also report that a subset of human participants analysed with the passive oddball task showed intact deviance detection despite reduced predictive suppression in the saccadic task. The connectivity analysis in mice suggested a mechanistic correlate. Granger causality indicated an altered balance between top-down ACa-to-V1 and bottom-up V1-to-ACa influences in the delta band 24 hours after psilocybin, consistent with weakened top-down modulation. Finally, structural analyses showed that ACa neurons projecting to V1 underwent spine growth after psilocybin. Spine density increased in females and spine volume increased in males, indicating sex-dependent effects on the measured structural metrics. The authors state that functional effects themselves did not show clear sex-by-group interactions.
Discussion
The authors interpret the results as evidence that serotonergic psychedelics relax predictive processing in the post-acute period by weakening top-down cortical influence on sensory processing. They argue that, in both humans and mice, predictable stimuli normally evoke suppressed responses relative to unexpected stimuli, and that this context-dependent suppression is reduced after psychedelic exposure. In humans, this was seen as a loss of the usual enhancement of express saccades and early EEG suppression for predictable visual targets. In mice, a comparable loss of predictive suppression in V1 appeared 24 hours after psilocybin. The authors view the accompanying reduction in ACa-to-V1 directional influence as consistent with a circuit-level mechanism for this effect. West and colleagues place these findings within predictive processing and the ReBUS framework, which proposes that psychedelics may loosen entrenched priors and bias top-down inference, thereby enabling a more flexible reassessment of incoming information. They suggest that the spine growth observed in ACa neurons projecting to V1 may be the structural substrate of reduced precision in higher-level priors or weakened effective connectivity, even though the precise relationship between increased spine growth and decreased long-range influence remains uncertain. They also note that similar post-acute weakening in connectivity has been reported in other cortico-subcortical networks after psychedelic treatment, which they say is compatible with a broader reorganisation of network function. The authors acknowledge several limitations. The human component was retrospective and between-subjects rather than randomised, so causality cannot be established from the human data alone. The psychedelic group differed somewhat from controls in health/safety risk-taking and cannabis use, although excluding frequent cannabis users did not change the main findings. The second psychedelic cohort using 5-MeO-DMT included some participants who had also used psilocybin recently, which may have blurred time-since-use relationships. They also note that the human and mouse paradigms were not perfectly matched, and that the study focused on visual processing as a model system, so the extent to which these findings generalise to mood, anxiety or addiction outcomes is still unknown. In terms of implications, the authors suggest that reduced top-down influence after psychedelics may help explain the increased cognitive flexibility reported in the post-acute period. They propose that future clinical studies should test whether visual predictive-processing measures correlate with treatment response and whether manipulating ACa-to-V1-related plasticity changes both circuit function and behaviour. They also note that their paradigm is relatively rapid and non-invasive, which may make it useful for translational work in clinical settings.
View full paper sections
RECENT PSYCHEDELICS USERS EXHIBIT FEWER SHORT LATENCY "EXPRESS" SACCADES TO PREDICTABLY PRESENTED TARGETS
Sixteen individuals who had recently taken psychoactive doses of 5-HT 2A receptor agonist psychedelics (PSY group; psilocybin [n=15] or LSD [n=1]) in the past 21 days (range 1 to 21 days) and sixteen age and sex matched comparison subjects (controls or CNT; see Table) were recruited for this study. PSY and CNT did not differ in major personality metrics (fivefactor model ()) or risk-taking behaviors, except for a slight increase in health/safety risk taking in the PSY group (t(30)=2.10, p=.04). Three subjects in the CNT group had used psychedelics previously at some point during their lifetimes, but were not group-level outliers in any of the major effects reported. The PSY group differed from the CNT group in the proportion of subjects using cannabis frequently (>4 times a month; Table), but the pattern of all major effects reported did not change when excluding the PSY participants with frequent cannabis use. First, we administered a SPTto study predictive processing and updating after psychedelics use. The SPT requires subjects to fixate on a central cross (i.e., prestimulus) after which a star-shaped stimulus appears at one of eight locations (Fig.). For the majority of trials (85%), the stimulus appears at a standard (predictable) location and is colored green or purple ("standard" trials). On a subset of trials (15%), the stimulus appears at a "deviant" (unexpected) location. On half of these deviant trials, the stimulus is orange and does not signal a change in the standard stimulus location ("deviant-no-update" trials). On the other half of the deviant trials, the stimulus is purple or green and signals a new "standard" stimulus location ("deviant-update" trials). This paradigm allows researchers to assess a) whether and how prior information about stimulus location affects behavior (i.e., response latencies to stimuli at expected or unexpected locations), and b) how individuals integrate new information to update behavior. We measured saccades through electrooculograms via two electrodes, placed just below and on the outer canthus of the left eye (Supplemental fig.). Saccadic reaction times for each participant were scored blind to group identity and trial type (see Methods). Overall, participants produced faster saccades to stimuli at standard (predictable) locations than to stimuli at deviant (or unexpected) locations (standard mean/std: 264.5ms/28.3ms; deviant: 290.3ms/31.3ms; F location (1,30)=44.8, p = 4 × 10 -7 ). On average, CNT participants produced slightly faster saccades than PSY participants (CNT: 267.6ms/28.2ms; PSY: 287.2ms/24.4ms; F group (1,30)=4.4,p=0.04), but group differences in mean latency did not vary as a function of stimulus location (standard/expected location vs deviant location; F interaction (1,30)=0.97, p=0.33). However, comparison of the distributions of response latencies to different trial types suggested that predictability modulated response times differently between groups: CNT participants generated different types of saccades to predictable versus unexpected target locations (Fig.; kstest=.069, p=0.008), while PSY did not (kstest=.038, p=0.34). CNT and PSY response distributions to the deviant stimulus locations were not different (kstest=.048, p=.33), while the CNT response distribution to the standard (expected) location differed dramatically from the PSY distribution (kstest=0.86, p = 2.5 × 10 -8 ). As illustrated in Fig., CNT participants produced an enriched proportion of short latency responses (<200ms) to targets in the standard location relative to the deviant location. This set of short latency saccades contains two subtypes: anticipatory saccades (ii in Fig.) and express saccades (iii in Fig.). Saccades <75ms are considered anticipatory as this is the lower limit of visual afferent innervation of saccade-generating brainstem nuclei, and thus these saccades are non-visually driven. CNT and PSY did not differ in the overall percentage of anticipatory responses (Fig 1C ; CNT: 6.3%/5.2%; PSY:4.1%/3.8%; F group (1,30)=2.2, p=0.15), nor was there a group by stimulus location interaction (F interaction (1,30)=0.16, p=0.69). On the other hand, express saccades are a subpopulation of very fast -yet visually-driven (nonanticipatory) -saccades with a mode around ≈110ms, separate from typical response latencies around 200ms. Such fast responses arise when stimulus location and timing is fixed or highly predictable. Express saccades reflect preparatory increases in excitability in visual and visuomotor regions driven by top-down modulation from frontal and parietal regions. The fact that express saccade proportion increases with practicefurther suggests they encode learned spatiotemporal stimulus likelihoods. We found group differences in the proportion of express saccades (Fig.). Specifically, CNT participants produced a greater proportion of express saccades (75ms to 147ms; see methods for rationale) specifically to the standard stimulus (Fig.). When compared with the PSY saccades, CNT saccades include a greater percentage of express saccades to stimuli in the standard location (CNT mean/std: 10.5%/4.3%; PSY: 4.3%/3.8%; t(30)=4.29, p=0.0002), but showed no difference from the PSY group in express saccades to the deviant location (CNT: 4.1%/5.5%; PSY: 3.0%/3.4.%; t(30)=0.687, p=0.49; F interaction (1,30)=13.53 p=0.0009). Each subject completed the SPT two times, and these same effects held for both runs (Supplemental fig.). Further, the overall percentage of express saccades to the predictable stimulus location was correlated with the time that had passed since the last use of psychedelics (Fig.; r=0.532, p=0.033), suggesting that subjects begin to return to typical top-down control of saccadic circuitry after ≈7 days. The SPT also allows for an assessment of how individuals use new information to update their behavioral strategies. The proportion of express saccades was mostly stable to stimuli in the standard location across trials except for stimuli immediately after the "no update" deviant (Fig.). Subjects generated significantly fewer express saccades to the standard stimulus immediately after the "no update" deviant compared to the 2nd -4th standards after the no-update (F order (1,30)=8.10, p=0.008). However, this was not true for the standard stimuli after the "update" deviant (F order (1,30)=3.02, p=0.093). This was also true for mean saccade latencies over all responses per subject (no-update: F order (1,30)=21.23, p=0.001; true update F order (1,30)=0.08, p=0.776). Interestingly, this pattern was present in both groups (Fig.) and did not differ between groups (all interaction effects p>.198). A slowing effect after the "no update" deviant is highly consistent with past studies using this paradigm and has been interpreted to reflect effects of updating. That is, a) participants in both groups made faster saccades overall to the standard stimulus occurring immediately after the updating deviant, suggesting rapid updating of internal models of probable target locations in both groups, but b) participants erroneously updated their expectations to "no update" deviants, effecting slower responses to the subsequent "standard" stimulus (which recovered quickly).
RECENT PSYCHEDELICS USERS SHOW LESS PREDICTIVE SUPPRESSION OF EARLY VISUAL PROCESSING
Speeded responses to stimuli in predictable locations and times, and performance in the saccadic prediction task (SPT) in general, is thought to reflect top-down modulation of visuomotor processing based on context. If the lack of express saccades in PSY participants is driven by the attenuation of such top-down modulation, in line with the ReBUS theory, then the CNT group might also exhibit smaller cortical responses to stimuli in the standard location than to the deviant location while, the PSY group should show similar cortical responses to the stimulus in the standard location as to the deviant location. We recorded 32 channel electroencephalography (EEG-Biosemi) while subjects completed the SPT. Based on averaged event-related responses (ERPs) to stimuli in the time-voltage domain, PSY participants appeared to demonstrate greater cortical responses to all stimuli (Fig.). We analyzed the EEG activity in the time-frequency domain to increase signal to noise ratio (as the number of trials was ≈20 for some conditions), facilitate translation to animal models, and disentangle increases in signal power from phase-alignment across trials. Consistent with our hypothesis, trial-averaged power (i.e., average single-trial power) to the onset of saccadic targets appeared weaker to stimuli in the predictable (standard) location as compared to stimuli appearing in deviant locations in CNT (Fig.; averaged over all electrodes, 50-600ms post-stim onset), and this was generally true across the scalp in low frequencies (Fig). We split analyses into early (50-300ms) and late (300-600ms) based on the rise and fall of the power waveform (Fig.) as well as the established latencies of typically analysed early (e.g., N100, MMN) vs late (P300) evoked cortical activities (ERPs), respectively. We focused on traditional frequency bands (delta 1-4Hz, theta, 5-8Hz; alpha 9-13Hz; gamma 35 to 100 Hz), and separately examined effects of prediction (standard vs all deviants) and updating (deviant update vs deviant non-update). For the early period, CNT showed strong predictive modulation, with much stronger delta band responses to deviant stimuli relative to predictable stimuli (Fig.) while PSY showed no difference (F interaction (1,30)=9.25, p=.0049; , CNT-t(15)=3.052, p=.0081, PSY-t(15)=0.931, p=.3662). The same group by stimulus location interaction effect was present for early theta power (F interaction (1,30)=7.7, p=.0094; Supplemental fig.). For later processing periods, these group by stimulus location interactions were absent (delta-F(1,30)=2.29, p=.141; theta-F(1,30)=1.18, p=.285), as both PSY and CNT groups demonstrated augmented delta (Fig.) and theta power (Supplemental fig.) to deviant stimuli. This suggests that later brain responses to contextually deviant stimuli -putative prediction-error signals or downstream "deviance detection" -were unaffected by recent psychedelics use. Consistent with this interpretation, the degree of EEG phase-locking to stimulus onset was similarly impacted by psychedelic use. While single-trial power may reflect both stimulusentrained and endogenously-driven neural processing of a stimulus, inter-trial phase-locking to the onset of sensory stimuli specifically captures stimulus-entrained signals and may better index bottom-up processing of sensory inputs. Frequency bands above delta did not show strong phase-locking factor (PLF) for either group, so our analyses focused on delta. CNT participants showed increased PLF to stimuli in the deviant locations compared to stimuli in the standard location in delta frequencies, while PSY did not exhibit this effect in early time ranges (50-300ms; delta: F interaction (1,30)=8.61, p=0.006, CNT-t(15)=5.296,p=.00009, PSY-t(15)=-.805, p=.4335; Fig.). Similar to power, groups showed more modest differences in late delta PLF prediction effects, with only trend-level significance (F interaction (1,30)=3.93, p=0.06). Finally, the magnitude of early PLF to predictable stimuli was inversely correlated with the number of days since psychedelics had last been taken (r=-.670, p=0.0045; Fig.), in line with the effect on percent of express saccades to this stimulus. We did not observe any significant effects of update type (non-updating vs updating deviant) for either group for any frequency band for early or late time periods, for PLF or power (Supplemental fig.), although there was a trend toward higher gamma power in the late period for updating deviants, present in both groups F stim-location (1,30)=2.64, p = .11). Other frequency bands (alpha, beta, gamma) showed no main or interaction effects involving group or stimulus for either timebin for PLF or power. In sum, these EEG results concord with the behavioral results and suggest that only specific aspects of visual predictive processing are altered after psychedelics use. Late processing of prediction errors (Fig.) and context updating are not altered after psychedelics (saccade behavior -Fig.). On the other hand, top-down modulation of early sensory processing -i.e., the degree to which learned patterns modulate early or preparatory processing of subsequent stimuli -is weakened for days after a dose.
ALTERATIONS IN VISUAL PREDICTIVE PROCESSING GENERALIZE TO OTHER SEROTONERGIC PSYCHEDELICS
We additionally recruited 15 subjects who had recently (<24 days) taken a different serotonergic psychedelic compound, 5-MeO-DMT. Like psilocybin and LSD, 5-MeO-DMT involves an intense psychedelic experience involving altered perception, albeit with strong affinity for 5-HT 1A in addition to 5-HT 2A receptors (), and has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials for depression. Our 5-MeO-DMT group did not significantly differ from CNT in any demographic, lifestyle, or risk-taking behaviors, and only showed a moderately increased openness compared to the CNT group (D=0.81; Supplemental Table). We focused on the major effects that differentiated the PSY group from CNT in figures 1 and 2. Effects are presented in Supplemental fig.. Like the PSY group, the 5-MeO-DMT group showed a reduction of express saccades as a function of location compared to CNT (fewer to the predictable location; F interaction (1,29)=8.32, p=.007; fig.). Further, like in the PSY group, there was a group by stimulus location interaction on early delta power (F interaction (1,29)=7.75, p=.0094; fig.) and phase locking (F interaction (1,29)=15.32, p=.0009; fig. S4M) in the 5-MeO-DMT group, whereby the 5-MeO-DMT group did not show reduced early responses to the stimulus in predictable locations. Later power effects of stimulus location did not differ from CNT (F interaction (1,29)=1.83, p=.186; fig.), as was seen in the PSY group, but later PLF did (F interaction (1,29)=9.65, p=.0042; fig.), again similar to the PSY group, potentially reflecting the differential sensitivities of PLF vs power to stimulus-locked neural activities. Like the PSY group, the 5-MeO-DMT group showed evidence of intact updating in their behavioral metrics, as they did not differ from CNT in a slowed recovery from a nonupdating deviant (F stims-after-deviant (1,29)=7.76, p=.0093; F stim-by-group-Interaction (1,29)=0.99, p=.327) or in a fast recovery after an updating deviant (F stims-after-deviant (1,29)=0.48, p=.492; F stim-by-group- Interaction (1,29)=0.35, p=.558). Effects in both 5-MeO-DMT and PSY were present regardless of sex or age (Supplemental figure). In sum, a second group of subjects taking a different serotonergic psychedelic exhibited the same effects on behavioral and neural indices of predictive modulation of early visual processing, along with unaffected indices of late prediction error processing or context updating.
PSILOCYBIN ALTERS PREDICTIVE PROCESSING IN PRIMARY VISUAL CORTEX IN MICE
To directly test whether a dose of serotonergic psychedelics can alter visual predictive processing in the post-acute period, and to determine whether these effects are present in sensory processing regions, as suggested by the early latency effects in figure, we administered to mice a dose of psilocybin (PSL (from Usona Institute); 1mg/kg; I.P.; n=12: 8 male, 4 female) or saline (SAL; n=7; 4 male, 3 female). This dose was sufficient to induce a canonical head-twitch response in a subset of mice (later used for histology), confirming psychedelic-like effects (Fig.). Local field potentials were recorded in layer 2/3 of primary visual cortex (V1; Fig.) as previously reported. Twenty four hours after the dose (post-acute period), we examined visual predictive processing in awake head-fixed mice using a "standard" oddball paradigmand a "global-local" oddball paradigm. Stimuli were full-field 100% contrast drifting squarewave gratings (0.08 c.p.d.; moving at 2 Hz; oriented at 8 possible angles, 0 to 157.5 deg; 500ms stimuli, 500ms I.S.I). In the standard oddball, one stimulus orientation (i.e., 90-deg bars or "A" stimuli in Fig.) is presented repeatedly, and is occasionally interrupted at random times by a different "deviant" orientation (i.e., horizontal bars (0-deg) or "B" stimuli Fig.). Responses to the B orientation in this mostly predictable context are then compared to responses to B when it occurs during a more neutral context in which B is equally likely to appear as any other orientation -a "many-standards control" sequence (Fig.) to isolate "deviance detection" (i.e., augmented cortical responses to unexpected stimuli -a form of visual prediction error. In contrast, during the "global-local" paradigm (Fig.), B stimuli come after a sequence of A stimuli as well, yet always appear at the end of a 5 stimulus sequence (AAAAB; Fig.). Thus, in the global-local paradigm, B is locally deviant but globally predictable (i.e., sequentially expected), while in the standard oddball paradigm, B occurs at unpredictable times. In both cases, and in the control runs, B orientations occur at approximately once every ≈8-10 seconds. This approach provided us with the advantage of needing limited training (mice exhibited deviance detection and suppression on the first day of exposure, 1 hr prior to dosing; Supplemental fig.), and the ability to compare an equally salient stimulus (B) in both conditions (similar to a saccadic target in the human run) that is temporally predictable in one case (the global-local oddball) but not the other (the standard oddball). Global predictive processing implies that stimuli are processed in the context of learned probabilities or broader spatiotemporal patterns beyond local features (e.g., immediately previous or concurrent stimulus differences), requiring top-down modulation of sensory processing from higher brain regions. So, deviance detection to the B during the standard oddball paradigm, but not to the B during the global-local paradigm, would suggest that global predictive processing is intact. Deviance detection to both would suggest that local dynamics are intact, but global predictive processing is missing. Given that the latter requires top-down modulation from higher brain regions, we hypothesized that, like our human findings and in line with the ReBUS hypothesis, predictive processing in V1 would be altered after psychedelics. At this baseline, groups did not differ, with both exhibiting deviance detection only during the standard oddball paradigm (Supplemental fig.). Then, 24 hours after treatment (Sal or PSL), we observed a paradigm (standard vs global-local) by context (deviant vs control) by treatment interaction (F(1,67)=5., p=.024) on delta-theta power (2-10Hz) during the same early response period above (50-300ms). The Sal group exhibited a paradigm by context interaction (F(1,23)=14.489, p=.001) driven by deviance detection during the standard oddball (t(6)=2.03,p=.044) and deviance suppression during the global-local paradigm (t(6)=-2.449, p=.049), suggesting that responses to a locally deviant -but otherwise salient -stimuli were bidirectionally modulated by context (Fig.). Conversely, the PSL group showed strong deviance detection to both deviants, regardless of context (standard t(11)=3.14,p=.009; global-local t(11)=4.397, p=.001) and no paradigm by context interaction (F(1,43)=0.216, p=.645; Fig.). During the global-local paradigm, we also included catch trials with a deviant 5th item in the sequence other than B, as previously described. On 6 of the 70 sequence repeats (trials) the sequence was AAAA-C (a global and local deviant, where A was 90 degrees and C was 45 degrees) and on another 6 trials, the sequence was AAAA-A (a local redundant but a global deviant; all 90 degrees). These results are presented in supplemental figure S7. The SAL group exhibited significant deviance detection to both the C deviant (t(6)=3.798, p=.0045) and the A deviant (t(6)=3.097, p=.011), suggesting strong global predictive processing in the SAL group. On the other hand, the PSY group only displayed significant deviance detection to the C deviant (t(11)=3.324, p=.0034), but not to the A deviant (t(11)=1.251, p=.118). Therefore, psilocybin had a lasting post-acute impact on context-based suppression of salient but predictable stimuli in the visual system, aligning with effects seen in human participants during a predictive saccade task (Fig.). In a subset of human participants, we also collected the standard oddball paradigm, and results confirm that basic deviance detection was intact after psychedelics, despite a loss of predictive suppression during the SPT task (Supplemental fig.). The fact that deviance detection effects were present in V1 a day after psychedelics regardless of global context suggests that local predictive processing might dominate in visual cortex in the period after psychedelics, due to weakened top-down modulation from long-range projecting neurons in higher brain regions.
PSILOCYBIN ALTERS TOP-DOWN MODULATORY CIRCUITS FROM MPFC TO V1
Predictive processing in V1 depends on top-down feedback from higher brain areas, including ACa. To more directly test whether changes in visual predictive processing observed after psychedelics (Figs.) reflect alterations in the balance of top-down modulation versus bottom-up information processing in the cortex, we also recorded local field potentials from ACa along with V1 and calculated non-parametric Granger causality analysis across frequencies (1-40Hz) to assess directed functional connectivity between these nodes. We analysed whether top-down (ACa-to-V1) and/or bottom-up (V1-to-ACa) connectivity differed after psilocybin during the global-local paradigm, where predictive suppression was observed. We compared top-down vs bottom-up Granger coefficients at 11-12ms lags (based on past work and estimated conduction delays ()) in 3 bins -first stimulus, middle stimulus, final stimulus and focused on the delta-band, where the top-down influence was maximal (Figs.). We found that, 24 hours after psilocybin, there was an alteration in the balance of top-down vs bottom-up connectivity in this circuit in the delta band (F treatmentXdirection (1,95)=8.527, p=.004), regardless of time bin, suggesting broad weakening of top-down modulation after psychedelics (Fig.). Groups did not differ at baseline (Supplemental fig.; F(1,114)=0.710; p=.401). Recent work in mice has shown that psilocybin induces plasticity in ACa pyramidal neurons, including both pyramidal tract (PT) and intratelencephalic (IT) projection neurons. While the plasticity in the former type, PTs, which project to subcortical areas, has been linked to shifts in stress-related behaviors, the consequences of spine growth in IT-type neurons are unknown. Crucially, the ACa IT population could include feedback neurons that project back to V1 to support predictive processing. We sought next to determine whether this specific subpopulation of ACa neurons that project to V1 exhibit spine growth after psychedelics. Using a retrograde-Cre labelling approach (Fig.), we expressed GFP in ACa neurons that project to V1, and then fixed tissue 24-hrs after the saline or psilocybin dose. We utilized the RESPAN Toolboxto quantify spine density in n=384 dendritic segments and spine volume in n=16,597 spines from 6 mice treated with psilocybin (3 male/3 females) and 6 mice treated with saline (3 male/3 females). We found that psilocybin generally induced spine growth in both sexes of mice, however, there were sex by drug effects in both metrics, consistent with some past reports in mPFC after psilocybin. Spine density increased only in females (Fig.F sexXgroup (1,378)=5.006, p=.0258) while spine volume increased only in males (Fig.F sexXgroup (1,16591)=18.242, p=.00002). Although some past reports have identified sexdependent dose-response effects of psilocybin on alcohol consumption (5), we did not observe significant sex by group interaction effects in any functional or behavioral effects humans or mice (figure), suggesting that these sex differences in structural metrics might reflect similar plasticity with equivalent downstream consequences in cortical circuits.
DISCUSSION
A principal function of the neocortex is to process incoming sensory data in the context of concurrent and previous stimuli, perceived spatiotemporal patterns, motor outputs, and behavioral goals. Typically, a stimulus with contextually predictable features evokes smaller responses in sensory cortex than one with contextually deviant features, and subsequent reactions to that stimulus are facilitated by this predictability. Our study provides evidence for this in the comparison group of humans (Figs.) and in mice treated with saline (Fig.). We then show that a dose of serotonergic psychedelics alters these predictive processing functions in the postacute period, after the acute effects on perception have subsided (>24 hours). Specifically, in humans, responses to predictable yet salient stimuli (a saccadic target occurring in a repeated location) were no longer suppressed relative to contextually unexpected stimuli (a target in a novel location). In mice, a 1mg/kg dose of psilocybin also led, 24-hours later, to a similar loss of predictive suppression within primary visual cortex (V1). That is, when saline-treated mice were habituated to expect a change in visual stimulus orientation occurring at a specific interval, their visual cortices no longer responded strongly to this change. Yet, after psilocybin, this suppressive effect was lost. These effects coincided with weakened feedback modulation of V1 from neuronal populations in a higher brain area (ACa) -a region previously shown to support predictive processing through long range connections to sensory regions. These long range projection neurons in ACa also exhibited growth in dendritic spine number (females) or size (males; Fig.) after psilocybin. These results concord with the hypothesis that psychedelics alter predictive processing in hierarchically organized brain networks (), yet also emphasize these effects in the post-acute period, in the days after a dose. In a predictive processing framework (21, 51), higher-order brain areas modulate sensory processing in lower areas in line with expectations, observed contextual regularities, and/or perceptual priors: suppressing responses to sensory inputs that fit with current perceptual "priors" (gleaned from past experience) and augmenting responses when they do not (prediction errors). Consistent with this framework, oddball paradigms used here(along with sensorimotor (56) and visuospatial paradigms (49) all highlight a central role of feedback inputs to V1 in predictive suppression and prediction errors. In the current study, the former -predictive suppression -was specifically disrupted after psychedelics, which coincided with decreased directional functional coupling (Granger causality) in the top-down direction of the ACa-V1 circuit. However, ACa IT neurons that mediate this connection showed an increase in spines in the current study, despite their decreased long-range influence. Consistently, past work on the mPFC to amygdala networkand other corticosubcortical networks (59) have observed a similar post-acute weakening in connectivity in fMRI BOLD, despite the fact that synapses in mPFC PT neurons that project subcortically increase, like IT neurons in the current study. We propose that the growth in spines in higher brain areas after psychedelics is the structural substrate of decreased precision in high-level priors, which could affect both subcortical and cortical processing. Specifically, it is possible that, as psychedelics induce a broad and non-specific increase in synaptic connectivity within mPFC, pre-existing mPFC ensemble patterns are partially lost in favor of a shift toward all-all connectivity. This serves to weaken effective connectivity on distal target regions (e.g. V1), which otherwise precisely integrate hardwired top-down inputs through local inhibitory (SST+ interneurons) and disinhibitory (VIP+ interneurons) microcircuitry. Altered engagement of these postsynpatic inhibitory circuits (by psychedelic reorganized top-down projections) may thereby weaken stimulus-specific inhibitory control of V1 neural populations. To test this model, future work should aim to directly block spine growth in the subset of neurons that project from ACa to V1 and determine whether this a) alters ACa-to-V1 effective connectivity (Granger causality), b) ACa ensemble membership, e.g.,, and c) predictive processing in V1. This study provides a candidate functional consequence of IT neuron plasticity after psychedelics. Past work in mice demonstrates that psilocybin increases spines in two major types of excitatory neurons in the mPFC -pyramidal tract neurons (PT) and intratelencephalic neurons (IT). While the former projects mainly to subcortical areas, such as amygdala, thalamus, and brainstem, the latter projects mainly within the cerebral cortex, including lower sensory areas. In humans, amygdala responses to emotional stimuli are known to change in the day after a psychedelic doseand mouse work has linked changes in depressive-and anxiety-like behaviors in mice to PT neuron plasticity in mPFC, providing a neural substrate. However, the impact of spine growth in IT neurons -which by many measures is equal or greater than PT neuron spine growth in mPFC -is not known. Here we confirm IT neurons within mPFC that project to V1 exhibit spine growth and suggest a functional impact of this plasticity: softened top-down modulation which weakens predictive suppression. These results highlight the lasting impacts of psychedelics on top-down modulation in the brain -an effect that more broadly could help explain the therapeutic benefits of these compounds. Interestingly, psychedelics consistently increase cognitive flexibility in both healthy individuals (32) and individuals with major depressionin the post-acute period. Temporarily weakened top-down influence on information processing offers a potential mechanism underlying this cognitive flexibility. This mechanism, in theory, would allow new information to escape the influence of overly negative schema or beliefs (as is proposed in major depressive disorderand update them. To confirm this possibility, future studies should aim to correlate visual predictive processing measures (such as those included in this study) with treatment response in clinical trials among various psychiatric populations. If confirmed, it may help recenter future research on enhancing IT neuron plasticity. On the other hand, it is possible that the core therapeutic effects of psychedelics rests in their modulation of PT neurons, while IT neuron plasticity may have differential, mostly perceptual, impacts, and thus, may be dispensable for the lasting therapeutic actions of psychedelics, which do not directly involve vision. Therefore, connecting these findings, and psilocybin-induced cortico-cortical circuit alterations more broadly, to therapeutic effects requires follow-up studies. Our results here provide a simple, rapid (<20 minutes with setup), and non-invasive approach for addressing this question in clinical settings while also providing a translational system for investigating cell and circuit-level mechanisms. One limitation of our study is that the human data come from a retrospective betweensubjects design. Although groups were matched on age, sex, and personality metrics, the PSY group had mildly increased health/safety risk taking and greater marijuana usage (Table). Importantly, excluding frequent marijuana users did not change the pattern of effects, and most effects identified correlated with time-since psychedelics use. With regard to personality differences, we highlight three subjects in the control group who have used psychedelics in their past (gray points in Figs.and); these subjects were not outliers in any major effects. Further, the subsequent mouse experiments helped to further establish a causal relationship between psychedelic use and visual cortical processing. Our second sample of psychedelics users used 5-MeO-DMT, which, like psilocybin and LSD, is a serotonergic psychedelic that activates 5-HT 2A receptors, yet 5-MeO-DMT also exhibits strong affinity for 5-HT 1A receptors. Still, 5-MeO-DMT induces similar spine growth in mPFC neurons to psilocybin, and also induces head-twitch responses in mice. Interestingly, we did not observe as strong correlations with time since use in the 5-MeO-DMT (Supplemental fig.), yet this could be due to the fact that three subjects had also done psilocybin within a week prior to their 5-MeO-DMT dose. Ultimately, future studies should validate our findings by including multiple timepoints from the same individuals, with random assignment and tight control of psilocybin dose. Another limitation of our study is that our paradigms were not precisely equivalent between these species, although both quantified rapidly emergent (same day, first exposure) predictive suppression of early visual cortical responses (see Supplemental methods: Paradigm choice). And while our study focuses on visual processing as a model system, we hypothesize that similar mechanisms of relaxed priors and increased bottom-up signaling may occur across multiple levels of the cortical hierarchy. Future work is needed to understand the connection between sensory cortical processing changes and the therapeutic effects on mood, anxiety, and addiction.
HUMANS
All experimental procedures were approved by the Georgia State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and were carried out in accordance with their guidelines. Participants were recruited through advertisements posted on university bulletin boards, social media platforms, and in local psychedelic community groups. Eligibility criteria included adults aged 18 or older with no history of autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, current major depressive episodes, or substance abuse, excluding nicotine. Participants filled out a detailed questionnaire to ensure suitability for study participation. Participants provided informed consent and were compensated $30 for their participation in the study. The study cohort comprised 47 individuals, divided into a control group and a psychedelic group. The control group consisted of 16 participants (6 male, 10 female), who had no recent (within 30 days) history of psychedelic use. The psychedelic group included 31 participants who had used psychedelics within 30 days prior to their participation in this study. This group was further subdivided based on the type of psychedelic used. The PSY subgroup consisted of 16 participants, with 15 taking mushrooms (7 male, 8 female) and 1 (male) taking LSD. Another subgroup comprised 12 participants (5 male, 7 female) who inhaled Incilius alvarius toad toxin. 5-MeO-DMT is considered to be the primary compound present that is responsible for the toxin's psychoactive effects. Dosage information for psilocybin, LSD, or 5-MeO-DMT was unattainable, as potency of the drugs used could not be ascertained directly, but participants were pre-screened to exclude those who only took sub-perceptual microdoses. All doses reported were judged as moderate to high. Additionally, within the psychedelic group, 3 out of 16 participants identified as nonbinary. Due to the small number of participants in this category, statistical analysis on gender was not feasible. Consequently, gender was excluded from the comparative analysis, although effects of sex and age on all major group differences were analyzed (Supplemental Fig.).
SACCADIC PREDICTION TASK:
The saccadic prediction task was conducted in a darkened room where participants were seated 100cm away from an LCD monitor (19-27 inches, 60Hz refresh rate). This task involved visual stimuli in the form of differently colored stars (2.46 degrees of visual angle in diameter), each appearing at one of eight designated spots 8 degrees from fixation on a circular layout. Participants were instructed to initially fixate on a central cross displayed on the screen for 1000ms, followed by shifting their gaze to the star, which appeared for the subsequent 1000ms at one of the eight spots. Each of the 142 trials per run was classified into three types, differentiated by the color of the star: 'expected' trials featured a green or purple star appearing in a predictable sequence at the same location; 'deviant-update' trials involved a green or purple star appearing unexpectedly at a new location, signaling participants to update their expectations; and 'deviant-no-update' trials, indicated by an orange star, appeared unexpectedly but did not require a change in expectation for future star locations. This color-coding scheme was not described to participants prior to the task, but allowed them to learn the significance of each color and to anticipate whether an update in expectation was necessary. Participants completed two consecutive runs for a total duration of nine minutes and forty-seven seconds. EEG recordings and data processing: EEG recordings and data processing were conducted using a 32-channel BioSemi ActiveTwo EEG system. Participants were fitted with a BioSemi 32-channel cap, arranged according to the 10-20 system for electrode placement. EEG data were recorded with a sampling rate of 500 Hz, using a band-pass filter of 0.16 Hz and a lowpass filter at 200 Hz. Reference electrodes were placed 1 cm to the right of Cz (later average referenced) and the ground electrode was positioned at 1 cm to the left of Cz. Impedance was tested prior to each run (SPT1, SPT2, Control run, Oddball, Oddball flip), and kept below 10kΩ for each electrode. Data preprocessing was performed using Besa Research software (Gräfelfing, Germany) as previously described. Data were average referenced and noisy channels were interpolated (two or fewer per run). Eye-blinks and saccades were identified using Independent Components Analyses (ICA) and removed from the EEG data. Individual trial data was then isolated for subsequent analysis (-700 to 1500ms pre-vs post-stimulus onset for SPT runs; -375ms to 875ms pre-to post-stimulus onset for oddball runs). For EEG analyses, SPT trials were excluded if there was no saccade, or if there was a saccade from -300ms to 150ms post-stimulus onset to ensure adequate processing of early stimulus evoked activity. Data was baselinecorrected (-200 to 0 ms pre-stimulus onset) and averaged for plotting event related potentials (Fig.), which was done mainly for descriptive purposes. The primary analyses of all human and mouse data were done in the time-frequency domain in Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA), using the EEGLAB toolbox. Individual trial data for each electrode was converted to the time-frequency domain with a modified morelet wavelet approach with 100 evenly spaced wavelets from 1 to 100 Hz (for SPT) or 2 to 100Hz (for oddball, as stimuli were only 500ms long, activity < 2Hz is difficult to interpret), linearly increasing in length from 1 to 25 cycles per wavelet, applied every 10ms. Stimulus-induced power spectra was computed as decibels relative to the pre-stimulus baseline (-200 to 0ms) for each frequency, timepoint, electrode, trial, condition, and participant, and averaged over trials to yield time-frequency power plots for each electrode, condition, and participant. Comparisons were carried out using traditional frequency bands (delta: 1-4Hz, theta: 5-8Hz (5-10 for mice); alpha: 9-14Hz, beta: 15-34Hz, gamma: 35-100Hz) and on two separate time windows based on maximal time and time-frequency responses in the grand average plots: early (50-300ms) and late (300-600ms). These two windows also map onto the established latencies of typically analysed early (e.g., N100, MMN) vs late (P300) evoked cortical activities (ERPs), respectively. We also separately examined effects of prediction (standard vs all deviants) and updating (deviant update vs deviant non-update). In order to minimize statistical comparisons, tests were carried out after averaging over all electrodes, as task related brain activity was largely scalp-wide (See Fig.). The number of trials used for each trial type was equated across conditions for the SPT (n=40 for standard and deviant locations). Additionally, intertrial phase locking (phase-locking factor, or PLF) was analyzed for the SPT task in order to help isolate brain activity that was locked to stimulus onset (i.e., not convolved with e.g., response preparation). PLF was calculated by dividing the complex results of the above described wavelet analysis by their absolute values for each electrode, timepoint, frequency, participant, trial, and condition. The resulting values were averaged across trials, with the absolute value of this result yielding the PLF or R-statistic, which is bound between 0 and 1 (1 indicating perfect phase alignment across trials). In non-phaselocked (or phase-randomized) data, R-values vary depending on the number of trials involved in the calculation and can be baseline corrected using previously described mathematical approaches, as they were done in this study. from the dorsal surface: 0.5mm), ACa: 200 nl/sites, 3 sites (X: 0.3mm, Y: 0mm, Depth 0.6mm, X: 0.4 mm, Y: 1.0 mm, Depth 1.1 mm, X: 0.4mm, Y: 2mm, Depth 1.0 mm). Drug administration and observation: Saline or Psilocybin (Usona Institute, 1mg/kg, intraperitoneally) was injected after the first LFP recordings. Mice were then returned to their home cages. In a subset of mice, we recorded their movements 15 minutes after dosing in the home cage using an iPhone 16 (apple) at 60 frames per second. Head-twich responses during these 30 minute videos were then scored manually, blind to drug group. LFP recordings and data processing: Head-fixation and visual stimulation habituation was performed seven to ten days following the surgery, in increments of 5-minute sessions each day (5 minutes for day one, 10 minutes for day 2, and 15 minutes for day 3), in which the visual stimuli were presented only once (many standards control run). This was done to acclimate the mouse to head-fixation and to reduce movement during recordings. Recordings took place two weeks after post-surgery.
GLOBAL-LOCAL
Mice were head-fixed to the recording apparatus and free to move on a manual treadmill during recordings. Mice were monitored by the experimenter to ensure that they were awake and not in clear distress or discomfort during all recordings. Insulated cables were connected to the implanted electrodes and plugged into a differential amplifier (Warner instruments, DP-304A, high-pass: 0 Hz, low-pass: 500 Hz, gain: 1K, Holliston, MA, USA. This step did not change results or conclusions. Local field potential signal processing and analysis: Trials with excessive signal (>≈5 std devs) in either V1 and ACa were manually excluded (between 0 and 10 for each mouse). Analyses focused on presentations of the same stimulus (0, 45, 90, or 135 degrees) in the neutral vs deviant context (control vs oddball) in both paradigms (standard vs global-local). The number of trials included was equated across conditions and paradigms (between 8 and 12). As such, analyses in the standard oddball were limited to the orientation that evoked the strongest response averaged across contexts (control and deviant/oddball). Only one orientation was presented as the deviant during the global-local (90 or 0 degrees), and we focused on the last 10-12 presentations to maximize estimates predictive suppression. During the global-localcontrol (i.e., when orientations were presented randomly in 5 stimulus bursts), we focused on trials in which that orientation was a) appearing in the 4th or 5th slot and b) not preceded by an orientation closer than 45 degrees of angle difference, in order to minimize the short term impacts of stimulus specific adaptationand to better match the global-local-oddball condition. Ongoing data were converted to the time-frequency domain with the same approach described above. Statistical analyses focused on comparisons between neutral and deviant stimulus induced power from delta to theta frequency bands, in the 50ms to 300ms period post stimulus onset to best match the time-frequency regions of interest from the human study. Theta in rodents is notably higher than in humans, so instead of 5-8Hz, we extended it to 10Hz. For analyzing effective connectivity between ACa and V1, we carried out a nonparametric Granger causality-based approach in the time-frequency domainas implemented in the Fieldtrip toolbox. This analysis examined lagged spectral covariance between regions for each direction (ACa to future-V1 vs V1 to future-ACa) for each frequency 1-40Hz. Data was binned in 1000ms segments throughout the continues recordings of the globallocal oddball and control runs. We focused on a time-lag of 11 to 15 ms based on similar studies of long-range brain connectivity in the mouse. The resulting value is a Granger coefficient (GC) reflecting the spectral covariance in between the signal from one region and the lagged signal from the other region.. Plots focused on 1 to 40Hz, as higher frequencies showed small values across mice. Analyses focused on 1 to 5Hz, as this is where the ACa to V1 granger causality was maximal across mice in the top-down direction (Fig.; S8). We split data into stimulus and inter-stimulus interval periods, and binned data in 1000ms bins at the start, middle, and end of each period, and then averaged over trials. Granger causality in the top-down direction was ostensibly stronger during the stimulus period across all mice, but this was not statistically significant (F directionXperiod (1,209)=2.02, p=.15). Focusing analyses only on the stimulus period, group differences remained (F directionXgroup (1,95)=7.57, p=.007). Histology: Mice were deeply anesthetized via urethane and 3% isoflurane and then perfused transcardially with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/PBS. Heads with electrodes and headplates attached were post-fixed in 4% PFA/PBS for two overnights. Four mice (2 of each group) required additional immunostaining. After isolation, brains were cryoprotected with 30% sucrose/PBS for one to two overnights and then embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura) and cryosectioned (50 µm). For spine analysis, sections were stained with anti-GFP (ThermoFisher, A11122, 1/1000), anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa488 (Jackson Immuno, #711-545-152, 1/500), DAPI (ThermoFisher, D1306, 1 µg/ml) in PBST (0.1% Tween20) and mounted using an antifade medium (VectorLabs, H-1700-2).Sections were scanned using LSM880 (Zeiss) confocal microscopy. Images were analyzed using FIJI and RESPAN with a pre-trained model (Model 1A). Staining method and batch was included as a fixed covariate to account for procedural differences across a subset of animals.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES:
All statistics were carried out in Matlab. In the human data, all measures and effects reported in figures 1-2 and supplemental figures S1-S5, S8 came from the same 47 individuals, from either the SPT task (2 runs combined) or the oddball paradigm (S8). For saccade analyses, we used Komologrov-Smirnov tests on mean-centered saccade distributions, collapsed over all participants in each group, to test for differences in latency distributions. We used mixed ANOVAs on saccade latency and proportion of express saccades, with GROUP as a betweensubjects factor (CNT, PSY or 5-MeO-DMT) and LOCATION as a within-subjects factor (standard, deviant). For SPT task EEG activity, we used mixed ANOVAs on early and late time period power and PLF, with GROUP as a between-subjects factor (CNT, PSY or 5-MeO-DMT) and LOCATION as a within-subjects factor (standard, deviant). For both saccades and EEG data during the SPT, we focused analyses on the second through fourth standards in the sequence in order to equate the number of trials across conditions and avoid updating effects (see Fig.). Analyses were carried out on the average across all electrodes to minimize statistical tests, and separately for delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands. Significant interactions were followed up with paired or two-sample t-tests with one-tailed significance, as greater activity to the deviant vs the standard was the clear a priori hypothesis. In the mouse data, in all cases (stimulus induced power, Granger coefficients, spine metrics), we carried out linear mixed effects (LME) models with mouse as a random effects variable, and sex included as a covariate. Functional data reported in figures 3-4 and supplemental figures S6, S7, and S9 came from the same 19 mice, recorded during oddball paradigms. Structural data came from an additional 12 mice. To compare visual processing in mice, we focused on the post dose time point (24 hours) for the main analyses. We averaged activity across trials (see above) within the time bin (50-300ms) and frequency band (delta-theta) that differed in the human part of the study, in order to minimize statistical comparisons. We included fixed-effects terms for treatment (psilocybin vs saline), paradigm (global-local vs standard oddball), and context (neutral vs deviant), in addition to all second and third-order interactions. The model was restricted to the three primary interaction terms of interest to preserve statistical power and avoid overfitting. Sex was included as a main effect covariate rather than an interaction term, as the data were insufficiently powered to reliably estimate higher-order interactions. Ostensibly, effects were present regardless of sex. The variation for repeated measures within mouse was accounted for by including mouse as a random effects term. Significant interactions were followed up with two-sample t-tests with two-tailed significance during the global-local oddball (as responses could be augmented or suppressed, depending on whether top-down suppression is intact) and one-tailed significance during the standard oddball (as numerous past studies have all observed the same increase in delta-theta power to deviant stimuli). For the Granger causality analysis, averaged across lags (11 to 12ms) and runs (oddball and control) and low frequencies (2-4Hz, based on overall average curve, figure) for each mouse, direction (top-down vs bottom-up), bin (beginning, middle, end of segment), and treatment (SAL vs PSL). Again, the model was restricted to the three primary interaction terms of interest (bin, direction, treatment) to preserve statistical power and avoid overfitting, while sex was included as a fixed effect variable and mouse as a random effects term. To analyse spine density, single measures for each dendritic segment were analysed in an LME with treatment (SAL vs PSL) and sex as fixed effects terms, along with a sex by treatment interaction. We also included batch (three separate batches with equal numbers from each group) as a fixed effect variable and mouse as a random effects term. The same model was used for spine volume.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumansrodents
- Characteristicsobservationalbrain measures
- Compounds
- Topics
- APA Citation
References (19)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Dourron, H. M., Nichols, C. D., Simonsson, O. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2023)
Alper, K., Cange, J., Sah, R. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2023)
Savalia, N., Shao, L-X,, Kwan, A. C. · Trends in Neuroscience (2021)
Shao, L-X,, Liao, C., Gregg, I. et al. · Neuron (2021)
Ly, C., Greb, A. C., Cameron, L. P. et al. · Cell Reports (2018)
Moliner, R., Girych, M., Brunello, C. A. et al. · Nature Neuroscience (2023)
Shao, L-X,, Tan, D., Liao, C., Davoudian, P. A. et al. · Nature Communications (2025)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Friston, K. J. · Pharmacological Reviews (2019)
Bravermanová, A., Viktorinová, M., Tylš, F. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2018)
Show all 19 referencesShow fewer
Duerler, P., Brem, S., Fraga-González, G. et al. · Cerebral Cortex (2021)
Umbricht, A., Vollenweider, F. X., Schmid, L. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2003)
Perry, C. M., Malina, M. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Lyons, T., Spriggs, M. J., Kerkelä, L. et al. · Nature Communications (2026)
Cubała, W. J., Bajbouj, M., Bauer, M. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2026)
Zeifman, R. J., Spriggs, M. J., Kettner, H. et al. · Scientific Reports (2025)
Mertens, L. J., Wall, M. B., Roseman, L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Roseman, L., Demetriou, L., Wall, M. B. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Doss, M. K., Považan, M., Rosenberg, M. D. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2021)