Regulation of human research with LSD in the United States (1949-1987)
This article (2017) reviews the history of the regulation of LSD research through the 1962 Kefauver-Harris Amendments (making it harder to do psychedelic research) and their implementation over the course of the ensuing decade.
Abstract
Human research with hallucinogens such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) has been ongoing in the USA since 1949. During the 1960s, LSD was investigated for a variety of psychiatric indications, including the following: as an aid in treatment of schizophrenia; as a means of creating a “model psychosis”; as a direct antidepressant; and as an adjunct to psychotherapy. Studies with all drugs, including LSD, have always been conducted under federal regulatory controls, including the 1938 Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA; which ensured the safety of drugs) and the 1962 Kefauver-Harris Amendments to the FDCA (which described appropriate scientific methodology and ensured drug efficacy). This paper details how the 1962 Amendments introduced numerous safety and efficacy requirements that must be in satisfied during clinical drug research-and how human studies conducted with LSD in the 1960s struggled with their fulfillment. Information is provided from Senate hearings, case law, and interviews with key investigators. Examples are also drawn from scientific papers and symposia published during and since that period, with a focus on information from clinical studies conducted with LSD by psychiatrist Albert Kurland at the Spring Grove State Hospital, near Baltimore, MD. While Kurland largely conformed with these new regulations, other investigators often fell short of complying with scientific standards and federal requirements. Thus, the human hallucinogen studies of the 1960s are best understood as providing pilot data on safety and efficacy, as well as testable hypotheses for current hallucinogen studies conducted under modern scientific and regulatory standards.
Research Summary of 'Regulation of human research with LSD in the United States (1949-1987)'
Introduction
Bonson frames the paper against a renewed contemporary interest in clinical research with hallucinogens in the USA and notes that modern studies are conducted under a regulatory architecture that includes investigational new drug (IND) applications to FDA, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, informed consent, and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Schedule I licensing when relevant. The author emphasises that this regulatory environment was not in place in the early decades of LSD research and that changes introduced in the 1960s, particularly the 1962 Kefauver–Harris Amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), imposed new safety and efficacy requirements that affected how human studies could be undertaken. The paper sets out to trace how those regulatory changes were applied to human LSD research between 1949 and 1987, to evaluate how investigators attempted to comply with the new rules, and to explain why LSD research declined. Bonson uses multiple documentary sources and examples, with a particular focus on the clinical work of Albert Kurland at Spring Grove State Hospital, to assess the scientific and regulatory adequacy of 1960s-era LSD studies and to locate their contributions in relation to modern standards of clinical drug research.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- APA Citation
Bonson, K. R. (2018). Regulation of human research with LSD in the United States (1949-1987). Psychopharmacology, 235(2), 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4777-4
References (2)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Mangini, M. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2011)
Oram, M. · History of Psychiatry (2016)
Cited By (19)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Tagen, M., Mantuani, D., Van Heerden, L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Henningfield, J. E., Coe, M. A., Griffiths, R. R. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2022)
Nichols, C. D. · Neuropharmacology (2022)
Johnson, M. W. · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (2022)
Nichols, C. D., Wiatr, K., Figiel, M. et al. · Journal of Neurochemistry (2021)
Hall, W. · Psychological Medicine (2021)
Strauss, D., de la Salle, S., Sloshower, J. A. et al. · Journal of Medical Ethics (2021)
Teixeira, P. J., Johnson, M. W., Timmermann, C. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Bouso, J. C., Ona, G., Dos Santos, R. G. et al. · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (2021)
DiVito, A. J., Leger, R. F. · Molecular Biology Reports (2020)
Show all 19 papersShow fewer
Goldberg, S. B., Shechet, B., Nicholas, C. R. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2020)
O'callaghan, C., Hubik, D. J., Psychiatry, M. et al. · Journal of Music Therapy (2020)
Aday, J. S., Mitzkovitz, C. M., Bloesch, E. K. et al. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2020)
Nichols, C. D., Hendricks, P. S. · Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience (2020)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Davis, A. K., Fire Erowid et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Richards, W. A., Garcia-Romeu, A. · International Review of Psychiatry (2018)
Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R., Hendricks, P. S. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Belouin, S. J., Henningfield, J. E. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Nichols, D. E. · ACS Chemical Neuroscience (2018)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.