The challenges ahead for psychedelic ‘medicine’
This paper (2022) discusess a number of challenges inherent to psychedelic medicine including the challenges related to the design of individual research studies such as blinding, expectancy, the use of therapy and sources of bias. The broader researcher environment and issues related to evidence, funding and the current scheduling of psychedelics are just some of the other topic discussed.
Authors
- Suresh Muthukumaraswamy
- Rebecca Sumner
- Anna Forsyth
Published
Abstract
With the extensive public, commercial and scientific interest from what has been widely termed the psychedelic renaissance, it is important that the scientific practices and results obtained from its implementation into medicine are put under a critical microscope. While there are numerous works on the potential benefits and applications of psychedelics as medicines, relatively little has been written about the challenges this field will face when incorporated into modern medical practice. Indeed, as a new or at least revived area of investigation, psychedelic medicine has a particular set of challenges that need to be addressed. In this viewpoint, we identify a number of these challenges. First, challenges related to the design of individual research studies are discussed, particularly focusing on current practices surrounding blinding, expectancy, the use of therapy and sources of bias. Second, the broader context of the research environment is considered, including how medical science typically establishes evidence, funding bodies and the impact of psychedelics being scheduled at odds with their risk profile. Finally, we describe challenges relating to the implementation of psychedelic therapies into modern medicine, considering the social and economic context. Alongside, we provide suggestions for what could be included into current research protocols to mitigate these challenges.
Research Summary of 'The challenges ahead for psychedelic ‘medicine’'
Introduction
Psychedelic compounds have attracted substantial public, clinical and commercial interest for potential treatments of disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. Earlier work has emphasised potential benefits, but relatively little has been written about the practical, methodological and ethical challenges that will arise as psychedelic interventions are moved into mainstream medical practice. Muthukumaraswamy and colleagues set out a thematic viewpoint identifying those challenges. The paper focuses on three broad domains: internal research design issues in randomised controlled trials (for example blinding, expectancy and psychotherapy-related variables), the wider research environment (including funding, transparency and drug scheduling), and implementation challenges for integrating psychedelic therapies into modern healthcare systems. The authors also offer suggestions for practices that could be incorporated into current research protocols to mitigate these challenges.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Muthukumaraswamy, S., Forsyth, A., & Sumner, R. L. (2022). The challenges ahead for psychedelic ‘medicine’. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 56(11), 1378-1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221081763
References (8)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Wagner, A. C., Agrawal, M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2021)
Johnson, M. W. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
Mason, N. L., Kuypers, K. P. C. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2018)
Mitchell, J., Bogenschutz, M. P., Lilienstein, A. et al. · Nature Medicine (2021)
Muthukumaraswamy, S., Forsyth, B., Lumley, T. · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (2021)
King, C., Nichols, D. E. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013)
Reiff, C. M., Richman, E. E., Nemeroff, C. B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2020)
Cited By (6)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Orłowski, P., Domagalik, A., Bola, M. · Human Brain Mapping (2026)
Orłowski, P., Hobot, J., Ruban, A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Bremler, R., Katati, N., Shergill, P. et al. · Scientific Reports (2023)
Muthukumaraswamy, S. · Psyarxiv (2023)
Weiss, B., Ginige, I., Shannon, L. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2023)
Kopra, E., Ferris, J. A., Winstock, A. R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.