Can pragmatic research, real-world data and digital technologies aid the development of psychedelic medicine?
The paper argues that conventional confirmatory trials alone are insufficient to establish safety and best practice for psychedelic therapy and risks being overtaken by hype and regulation. It recommends complementing these trials with pragmatic trials, real‑world data initiatives and digital health technologies to accelerate discovery of optimal, personalised, safe and cost‑efficient treatment protocols.
Authors
- Robin Carhart-Harris
- David Nutt
- David Erritzoe
Published
Abstract
Favourable regulatory assessments, liberal policy changes, new research centres and substantial commercial investment signal that psychedelic therapy is making a major comeback. Positive findings from modern trials are catalysing developments, but it is questionable whether current confirmatory trials are sufficient for advancing our understanding of safety and best practice. Here we suggest supplementing traditional confirmatory trials with pragmatic trials, real-world data initiatives and digital health solutions to better support the discovery of optimal and personalised treatment protocols and parameters. These recommendations are intended to help support the development of safe, effective and cost-efficient psychedelic therapy, which, given its history, is vulnerable to excesses of hype and regulation.
Research Summary of 'Can pragmatic research, real-world data and digital technologies aid the development of psychedelic medicine?'
Introduction
Mental disorders and substance misuse impose a vast global burden, with mental illness among the most costly and prevalent health problems in many high-income countries. Despite rising use of psychiatric medications and psychotherapies, population-level prevalence of mental illness has not declined and existing treatments often produce modest benefit, limited tolerability or restricted access. Carhart-Harris and colleagues situate psychedelic therapy—a psychologically supported administration of classic serotonergic psychedelics (agonists at the serotonin 2A receptor)—within this context, arguing it is a biopsychosocial intervention with promise for depression, end-of-life anxiety, addiction, OCD and possibly other conditions such as eating disorders and chronic pain. They note features that distinguish psychedelic therapy from conventional psychopharmacology: a novel mechanism, rapid and sometimes enduring effects after one or a few doses, low addiction potential, and a safety profile that centres on the need for careful psychological preparation and supervised contexts rather than toxicological hazard alone. Building on this background, the paper advocates supplementing traditional confirmatory double-blind randomised controlled trials (DB-RCTs) with more pragmatic research approaches, real-world data collection and digital technologies. The authors argue that pragmatic trials, basket protocols (single-protocol studies that test one intervention across multiple linked indications), electronic registries and smartphone-based outcome capture could accelerate learning about optimal dosing, psychotherapy integration, patient selection and safety across diverse populations. They position these approaches as complementary to DB-RCTs: useful early in the development pathway to avoid premature regulatory “lock-in” of suboptimal practice and to generate large datasets for prediction-of-response modelling, harm reduction and personalised care.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Wagner, A. C., Agrawal, M., Kettner, H., Rosenbaum, J. F., Gazzaley, A., Nutt, D. J., & Erritzoe, D. (2022). Can pragmatic research, real-world data and digital technologies aid the development of psychedelic medicine?. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 36(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811211008567
References (20)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Andersen, K. A. A., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (2020)
Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L. · World Psychiatry (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Friston, K. J. · Pharmacological Reviews (2019)
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)
Forstmann, M., Yudkin, D. A., Prosser, A. M. B. et al. · PNAS (2020)
Haijen, E. C. H. M., Kaelen, M., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Hendricks, P. S., Thorne, C. B., Clark, B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Cosimano, M. P. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2014)
Kelly, J. R., Crockett, M. T., Alexander, L. et al. · Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine (2020)
Show all 20 referencesShow fewer
Ly, C., Greb, A. C., Cameron, L. P. et al. · Cell Reports (2018)
Moreno, F. A., Wiegand, C. B., Taitano, E. K. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2006)
Nichols, D. E. · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (2017)
Nutt, D. J., Erritzoe, D., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Cell (2020)
Ona, G., Kohek, M., Massaguer, T. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2019)
Renelli, M., Fletcher, J., Tupper, K. W. et al. · Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (2018)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Rucker, J., Iliff, J., Nutt, D. J. · Neuropharmacology (2017)
Spriggs, M. J., Kettner, •. H., Carhart-Harris, •. R. L. · Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (2020)
Szigeti, B., Kartner, L., Blemings, A. et al. · eLife (2021)
Cited By (21)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Teixeira, P. J., Jain, R., Penn, A. D. et al. · Preventative Medicine Reports (2025)
Pronovost-Morgan, C., Greenway, K. T., Roseman, L. · Nature Medicine (2025)
Marrocu, A., Kettner, H., Weiss, B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Szigeti, B., Weiss, B., Rosas, F. E. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2024)
Zeifman, R. J., Wagner, A. C., Monson, C. M. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Szigeti, B., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. et al. · Scientific Reports (2023)
Zafar, R., Siegel, M., Harding, R. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2023)
Kopra, E., Ferris, J. A., Winstock, A. R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Perkins, D., Pagni, B. A., Sarris, J. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Nygart, V., Pommerencke, L. M., Haijen, E. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Show all 21 papersShow fewer
Daws, R. E., Timmermann, C., Giribaldi, B. et al. · Nature Medicine (2022)
Murphy, R., Murphy-Beiner, A., Kettner, H. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Tagliazucchi, E. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Raison, C. L., Jain, R., Jain, S. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Muthukumaraswamy, S., Forsyth, A., Sumner, R. L. · Australian and new-zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2022)
Dursun, S. M., Kelly, J. R., Gillan, C. M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Aday, J. S., Heifets, B. D., Pratscher, S. D. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Kočárová, C., Horacek, J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Corrigan, K., Haran, M., Mccandliss, C. et al. · Irish Journal of Medical Science (2021)
Daws, R. E., Timmermann, C., Giribaldi, B. et al. · Research Square (2021)
Lewis-Healey, E., Laukkonen, R., Van Elk, M. · Psyarxiv (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.