A novel psychedelic 5-HT2A receptor agonist GM-2505: The pharmacokinetic, safety, and pharmacodynamic profile from a randomized trial healthy volunteer
In a randomized, placebo‑controlled ascending‑dose study in 48 healthy volunteers, single IV doses of GM‑2505 up to 20 mg were well tolerated and showed dose‑proportional pharmacokinetics (t1/2 40–50 min) with dose‑dependent neuroendocrine, neurophysiological and subjective psychedelic effects, including decreased theta/alpha and increased gamma EEG power. The duration of cardiovascular and subjective effects was intermediate between psilocybin and DMT, indicating a practical 10–15 mg IV dose range for supervised clinical use.
Authors
- Austin, E. W.
- Borghans, L. G. J. M.
- Christian, E. P.
Published
Abstract
Background: The treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) with available antidepressant drugs is characterized by considerable ineffectiveness. Classical psychedelics such as psilocybin and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), which act primarily as 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT 2A ) receptor agonists, have shown preliminary efficacy for inducing long-term remission in MDD after one or two doses. GM-2505 is a novel, 5-HT 2A receptor agonist, developed for treating MDD. Methods: In this single-ascending dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we characterized GM-2505’s safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile in 48 healthy participants. Results: Single intravenous (IV) doses up to 20 mg demonstrated an acceptable safety profile of mild transient adverse events, short-term, non-clinically significant increases in blood pressure and pulse, and no significant changes in electrocardiographs, consistent with other 5-HT 2A receptor agonists. In general, GM-2505 C max and AUC last increased dose proportionally, with t 1/2 of 40–50 minutes. Generally, dose-dependent effects were observed for neuroendocrine hormones, several neuropsychological and neurophysiological measures, and subjective drug effects. Dose-related effects were also observed in resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG), with decreased power in the low frequency rsEEG bands (theta and alpha), and increased in the high frequency bands (slow and fast gamma). Conclusions: These PD findings were similar in nature and magnitude to other 5-HT 2A receptor agonists that have been studied clinically. In line with the GM-2505 PK profile, the duration of cardiovascular and subjective effects was shorter than psilocybin but longer than DMT, demonstrating a potentially more practical temporal profile for use in a supervised clinical setting compared to longer-acting 5-HT 2A receptor agonists, with an optimal dose range of 10–15 mg IV. Clinical trial (ISRCTN64428072) registration: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN64428072.
Research Summary of 'A novel psychedelic 5-HT2A receptor agonist GM-2505: The pharmacokinetic, safety, and pharmacodynamic profile from a randomized trial healthy volunteer'
Methods
The researchers randomised 48 healthy participants into six single-ascending-dose cohorts. Dose assignments in the extracted Methods text were: 0.34 mg (n = 4), 1 mg (n = 6), 3.3 mg (n = 6), 10 mg (n = 6), 15 mg (n = 6) and 20 mg (n = 6). In total, 34 participants received GM-2505 and 14 received placebo. Two participants in the placebo group were excluded from pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses because they did not complete all measurements. The extraction refers to participant demographics in a Table and to a CONSORT diagram in a supplement, but those items are not reproduced here. The trial is described in the extracted text as a single-ascending-dose, randomised study with placebo participants. The Methods text in the extraction does not clearly report some procedural details (for example, specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, the route of administration, or whether the study was blinded), and these details appear to be reported elsewhere in the full paper or supplements. Pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints were obtained by non-compartmental analysis of plasma concentration–time data using the PKNCA package in R. Repeatedly measured PD outcomes were analysed using mixed-model analyses of covariance with fixed effects for treatment, time and treatment-by-time interaction, participant as a random effect, and baseline as a covariate. Least-square mean estimates over time by treatment were presented with 95% confidence intervals. Treatment effects were assessed as contrasts between placebo and each GM-2505 dose. The trial was exploratory and not prospectively powered for formal hypothesis testing; reported P-values (α = 0.05) are described as nominal and no corrections for multiple comparisons were made. Variables were log-transformed when appropriate. All PD calculations except electroencephalography (EEG) were performed in SAS. EEG was evaluated in a post-hoc analysis using a linear mixed-effects model (MATLAB fitlme) with fixed effects for dose, time and their interaction and random intercepts for subjects; each dose was contrasted with placebo at each time point.
Results
The extracted Results text focuses on how safety, PK and PD data were summarised and analysed rather than presenting detailed numerical outcome data. Categorical outcomes (for example, adverse events) were summarised as counts and percentages. Continuous measures (for example, ECG, blood pressure and PK parameters) were summarised using descriptive statistics including means, change from baseline (CFB), standard deviation and coefficients of variation. PK endpoints were derived by the non-compartmental approach noted above. Repeated PD measures were analysed with the mixed-model ANCOVA framework; least-square mean estimates with 95% confidence intervals were generated and treatment contrasts versus placebo were reported. The authors note that the trial was exploratory, P-values are nominal, and no multiplicity correction was applied. EEG analyses were performed post hoc with a linear mixed-effects model testing dose effects at each time point against placebo. The extracted Results section does not include the specific numerical findings, frequencies of adverse events, PK parameter values (beyond the analytic approach), or PD effect sizes. The extraction refers to summary tables and supplementary material (for participant characteristics and a CONSORT diagram) that are not included in the provided text, so the precise results are not reproducible from this extraction alone.
Conclusion
The extracted Conclusion reports preclinical in vitro and in vivo pharmacology for GM-2505 and refers to supporting methods in a supplemental section. According to the extracted text, GM-2505 acted as a potent agonist at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in Ca2+ flux assays. The extracted EC50 values and maximal activation percentages reported in the text are: 5-HT2A — 17 nM, 82% activation; 5-HT2C — 9.5 nM, 85% activation. By contrast, GM-2505 showed minimal agonist activity at 5-HT2B (reported as >10,000 with 0.8% activation) and a high EC50 at 5-HT1A (reported as 16,918 nM with 83% activation). The extraction contains an unclear parenthetical remark about units (μM versus nM) and possible transcription artefacts; the precise units for the >10,000 figure are not clearly reported in the extracted text. In a rat synaptosome assay, GM-2505 reportedly increased serotonin (5-HT) release with an EC50 of 12.9 nM; the extraction compares this to DMT in the same assay (EC50 84.7 nM). In C57BL/6 mice, GM-2505 produced a dose-dependent head-twitch response (HTR) with an ED50 of 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously (95% CI: 0.21–0.41). The extracted Conclusion indicates these in vitro and in vivo findings support the compound's engagement of 5-HT2A/2C-related pharmacology, and that detailed methodology is provided in the supplemental material, but does not include additional interpretation or clinical data in the provided text.
View full paper sections
METHODS
Forty-eight participants met eligibility criteria and were randomized to six cohorts of eight individuals. GM-2505 was administered to participants as SADs of 0.34 mg (n = 4), 1 mg (n = 6), 3.3 mg (n = 6), 10 mg (n = 6), 15 mg (n = 6), or 20 mg (n = 6) and a total of 14 participants received placebo (in total, 34 GM-2505 and 14 placebo). Two participants in the placebo group were excluded from PD analyses as they did not complete all measurements. Participant demographics and baseline characteristics are found in Table. A CONSORT diagram is presented in Supplemental Section 4.6.
RESULTS
Safety and PK parameters were summarized by intervention and dose groups. Categorical variables (e.g. AEs) were summarized by counts and percentages, while continuous variables (e.g. ECG, BP, and PK parameters) were summarized by descriptive statistics, including means, change from baseline (CFB, where baseline was considered the last measurement before dosing for safety and PK, and the mean of the two pre-dose assessments for PD, where applicable), standard deviation (SD), and coefficients of variation. PK endpoints were derived by non-compartmental analysis of the plasma concentration-time data, using the PKNCApackage in R V4.0.3 for Windows (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2010; R Core Team, 2023). Repeatedly measured PD data were evaluated with mixed model analyses of covariance with treatment, time, and treatment by time as fixed effects, with participant as random effect, and with the (mean) baseline value as covariate. Least square means estimates over time by treatment were presented with 95% complex imagery (CI). Treatment effects were analysed as the contrasts between placebo and the different dose levels of GM-2505 for each PD endpoint, and these were reported along with 95% CI. This exploratory trial was not prospectively designed for formal hypothesis testing with statistical power; therefore, presented P-values (α = 0.05) for each comparison should be considered nominal. No corrections for multiple comparisons were made. Variables were log-transformed before analysis as needed. All PD calculations except those for EEG were performed using SAS for Windows V9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA; SAS Institute Inc., 2014). EEG data were evaluated in a post-hoc analysis using a linear mixed-effects model with repeated measures. The analysis was conducted using MATLAB's "fitlme" function. The model included fixed effects for dose, time, and their interaction, as well as random intercepts for subjects to account for intra-subject variability. Each dose's effect was tested against placebo at each time point using specific contrasts.
CONCLUSION
The in vitro and preclinical in vivo pharmacology of GM-2505, with supporting methodology, are described in Supplemental Section 1. In brief, GM-2505 was a potent 5-HT 2A and 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT 2C ) receptor agonist in Ca 2 + flux assays, with functional selectivity versus 5-hydroxytryptamine 2B (5-HT 2B ; i.e. no agonist activity detected at 10 mM) and 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT 1A ) receptors (EC50 17 μM (microMolar rather than milliMolar). Obtained EC50 values and the % activation at max concentration were: 5-HT 2A (17 nM, 82%); 5-HT 2C (9.5 nM, 85%); 5-HT 2B (>10,000; 0.8%); 5-HT 1A (16,918 nM, 83%). GM-2505 increased the release of 5-HT from rat synaptosomes with an EC50 value of 12.9 nM, in a similar fashion to DMT (EC50 84.7 nM) in the same assay. In C57BL/6 mice, GM-2505 produced dose-dependent induction of the HTR with an ED50 of 0.3 mg/kg, subcutaneous (95%, CI: 0.21-0.41).
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsrandomizedplacebo controlleddouble blinddose findingbrain measuresparallel group
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics