Effects of ecstasy on cooperative behaviour and perception of trustworthiness: A naturalistic study
In a naturalistic repeated‑measures study, acute recreational MDMA (ecstasy) use transiently increased perceived trustworthiness of faces and cooperative behaviour (dictator and ultimatum games) compared with controls, with no group differences three days later. The authors conclude a single dose appears to enhance aspects of empathy, which may help explain ecstasy’s recreational appeal and its potential to strengthen the therapeutic alliance.
Authors
- Matthew Wall
- Valerie Curran
- Celia Morgan
Published
Abstract
Background
Acute recreational use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; ‘ecstasy’) can promote pro-social effects which may alter interpersonal perceptions.
Aims
To explore such effects, this study investigated whether acute recreational use of ecstasy was associated with changes in individual perception of trustworthiness of people’s faces and co-operative behaviours.
Method
An independent group, repeated measures design was used in which 17 ecstasy users were tested on the night of drug use (day 0) and again three days later (day 3); 22 controls were tested on parallel days. On each day, participants rated the trustworthiness of 66 faces, carried out three co-operative behaviour tasks (public good; dictator; ultimatum game) and completed mood self-ratings.
Results
Acute ecstasy use was associated with increased face trustworthiness ratings and increased cooperative behaviour on the dictator and ultimatum games; on day 3 there were no group differences on any task. Self-ratings showed the standard acute ecstasy effects (euphoria, energy, jaw clenching) with negative effects (less empathy, compassion, more distrust, hostility) emerging on day 3.
Conclusions
Our findings of increased perceived trustworthiness and co-operative behaviours following use of ecstasy suggest that a single dose of the drug enhances aspects of empathy. This may in turn contribute to its popularity as a recreational drug and potentially to its enhancement of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy.
Research Summary of 'Effects of ecstasy on cooperative behaviour and perception of trustworthiness: A naturalistic study'
Introduction
MDMA (ecstasy) is reported to produce stimulant and pro-social effects, including increased feelings of friendliness, closeness and empathy. Previous clinical research has suggested that these empathogenic properties might augment psychological therapies such as those for post-traumatic stress disorder, and laboratory studies implicate serotonergic and oxytocinergic changes as mechanistic contributors to altered social cognition and affiliative behaviour. Experimental manipulations of serotonin and administration of oxytocin have been shown to change face perception, trust and economic cooperation in healthy volunteers, but no prior empirical study had objectively assessed social-cognitive mediators of MDMA's socially enhancing properties in a naturalistic recreational context. Stewart and colleagues set out to examine whether acute recreational ecstasy use is associated with changes in perceived trustworthiness of faces and in cooperative behaviour, and whether any such effects persist or reverse three days later. Using a naturalistic, independent-groups repeated-measures design, the investigators hypothesised that acute ecstasy use would increase face trustworthiness ratings and cooperative choices relative to non-using controls, and that sub-acute (day 3) effects would show a reversal consistent with post-use mood changes linked to serotonergic depletion.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Stewart, L., Ferguson, B., Morgan, C., Swaboda, N., Jones, L., Fenton, R., Wall, M., & Curran, H. (2014). Effects of ecstasy on cooperative behaviour and perception of trustworthiness: A naturalistic study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 28(11), 1001-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881114544775
References (4)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Dumont, G., Sweep, F., van der Steen, R. et al. · Social Neuroscience (2009)
´dric, C., Hysek, M., Schmid, Y. et al. · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (2013)
Kirkpatrick, M. G., Lee, R., Wardle, M. C. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2014)
Oehen, P., Traber, R., Widmer, V. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Cited By (11)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Jacobs, E., Zahid, Z., Hinkle, J. et al. · BMJ (2026)
Martinez, R. L., Radošić, N., Molla, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
O'Donnell, K., Okano, L., Alpert, M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2024)
Van Vugt, A. S., Zijlmans, J., Lindauer, R. et al. · Drug Science Policy and Law (2023)
Kangaslampi, S., Zijlmans, J. · European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (2023)
Basedow, L. A., Kuitunen-Paul, S., Wiedmann, M. F. et al. · European Journal of Psychotraumatology (2021)
Reiff, C. M., Richman, E. E., Nemeroff, C. B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2020)
Carlyle, M., Stevens, T., Fawaz, L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Jungaberle, H., Thal, S., Zeuch, A. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Show all 11 papersShow fewer
Bershad, A. K., Miller, M. A., Baggot, M. J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.