Psychedelic Experiences Increase Mind Perception but do not Change Atheist-Believer Status: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
This prospective longitudinal survey (n=657) finds that people who use psychedelics recreationally increase in prescribing 'mind perception' to living and non-living targets (e.g. plants and animals). However, unlike previous studies, they didn't find changes in metaphysical beliefs along the Atheist-Believer scale.
Authors
- Albert Garcia-Romeu
- Roland Griffiths
- Sandeep Nayak
Published
Abstract
Recent studies suggest psychedelic use may be associated with changes in a variety of beliefs or belief-like states, including increased 1) mind perception, 2) non-naturalistic beliefs, and 3) Atheist-Believer status (e.g., believer, agnostic, or non-believer). We conducted a prospective longitudinal study among participants (N = 657) who planned to have a psychedelic experience. We asked participants about their beliefs concerning mind perception of various entities, specific metaphysical positions, and Atheist-Believer status both before and after their experience. Replicating previous findings, we observed increases in mind perception across a variety of living and non-living targets (e.g., plants, animals). However, we found little to no change in metaphysical beliefs (e.g., dualism) or Atheist-Believer status. Taken together, these findings contrast with those from cross-sectional studies that psychedelic experiences result in changes to Atheist-Believer status and non-naturalistic beliefs but support the relevance of mind perception and mentalization.
Research Summary of 'Psychedelic Experiences Increase Mind Perception but do not Change Atheist-Believer Status: A Prospective Longitudinal Study'
Introduction
Psilocybin and other classical psychedelics have longstanding associations with spiritual and religious practices, and recent empirical work has suggested they may sometimes shift beliefs or belief-like states. Prior studies have reported increases after psychedelic use in constructs such as mind perception (the attribution of experience or agency to various entities), non-naturalistic or metaphysical beliefs (for example, dualism or idealism), and self-reported religious identification (Atheist-Believer status). However, much of that evidence comes from cross-sectional or retrospective surveys that are vulnerable to selection and recall biases, and some controlled trials lacked effective blinding or did not focus directly on belief change as a primary outcome. Nayak and colleagues set out to examine belief-related changes prospectively in a large sample of people who planned naturalistic psilocybin experiences. The study aimed to measure changes over time in three domains: mind perception toward a range of living and non-living targets, several metaphysical belief items (materialism, dualism, idealism, determinism), and self-classified Atheist-Believer status. The investigators hypothesised increases in mind perception, shifts toward non-naturalistic metaphysical beliefs, and movement from “nonbeliever” toward “believer.” The prospective design and multiple follow-up timepoints were intended to reduce recall bias and better characterise the magnitude and persistence of any changes occurring after naturalistic psilocybin use.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Authors
- APA Citation
Nayak, S. M., White, S. H., Hilbert, S. N., Lowe, M. X., Jackson, H., Griffiths, R. R., Garcia-Romeu, A., & Yaden, D. B. (2025). Psychedelic Experiences Increase Mind Perception but do not Change Atheist-Believer Status: A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 57(3), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2024.2346130
References (13)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Davis, A. K., Clifton, J. M., Weaver, E. G. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Griffiths, R. R., Hurwitz, E. S., Davis, A. K. et al. · PLOS ONE (2019)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)
Johnson, M. W. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
McGovern, H., Leptourgos, P., Hutchinson, B. et al. · Psyarxiv (2021)
Nayak, S., Griffiths, R. R. · Frontiers in Psychology (2022)
Nayak, S., Singh, M., Yaden, D. B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Smith, W. R., Sisti, D. · Journal of Medical Ethics (2020)
Swee, M. B., Nayak, S., Hurwitz, E. et al. · PLOS ONE (2022)
Show all 13 referencesShow fewer
Timmermann, C., Kettner, H., Letheby, C. et al. · Scientific Reports (2021)
Yaden, D. B., Anderson, D. · Philosophical Psychology (2021)
Yaden, D. B., Earp, D., Graziosi, M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2022)
Cited By (2)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Brown, R. E., Shinozuka, K., Kaloiani, I. et al. · Research Square (2026)
Yaden, D. B., Goldy, S. P., Weiss, B. et al. · Nature Reviews Psychology (2024)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.