Personality & Trait Factors

Personalised Perception: The Effect of Personality on the Sensory Effects of Psychedelics

This observational study (n=426) of psychedelic users in Aotearoa New Zealand found that personality traits were moderately associated with the intensity of several sensory distortions during psychedelic experiences, even after accounting for setting, dose and demographics. The authors suggest personality testing could help predict how people respond acutely to psychedelics.

Authors

  • Boardman, A.
  • Whelan, J.
  • Ward, R. D.

Published

Drug and Alcohol Review
individual Study

Abstract

Introduction

Psychedelics induce a wide range of sensory distortions and hallucinations (henceforth ‘distortions’). Yet, little is known about factors that influence the occurrence of certain distortions. Extra‐pharmacological variables including personality traits have been found to correlate with the occurrence of different subjective features during the acute psychedelic state. The current study aimed to examine the correlations between personality scores and the intensity of different distortions.

Methods

Four hundred and twenty‐six psychedelic users recruited from Aotearoa New Zealand completed an online survey which examined the intensity of 20 different distortions and measured six different personality traits using the five‐factor IPIP‐NEO‐60 and the 34‐item Tellegen Absorption Scale.

Results

Spearman's correlation analysis and linear regression analysis revealed that the intensity of sensory distortions (including visual trails, objects ‘breathing’, field‐of‐vision changes, visual acuity changes, taste hallucinations, out‐of‐body experiences, experiences of other dimensions, and synaesthesia) was significantly correlated ( p < 0.05) and associated with personality trait scores, even when setting, dose, and demographic variables were controlled, although the strength of the association was moderate at best.

Discussion and Conclusions

These findings emphasise the role of personality as a key extra‐pharmacological variable associated with the intensity of certain subjective features of the acute psychedelic state. These findings suggest that personality testing may be a valuable tool for the prediction of acute reactions to psychedelics. This information could be useful to clinicians and therapists in determining effective psychedelic‐treatment approaches.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Personalised Perception: The Effect of Personality on the Sensory Effects of Psychedelics'

Editorial

βBlossom's Take

This survey is useful because it makes personality a measurable part of the acute psychedelic response literature without overselling prediction. Trait absorption looks more informative than the Big Five, but the larger message is that set, setting and dose still outweigh personality, which is a helpful correction for simplistic screening ideas.

Introduction

Psychedelics are known to produce highly variable changes in perception, including visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, and gustatory distortions. The paper notes that while these substances are increasingly studied for therapeutic potential, the acute experience remains difficult to predict. Earlier research has suggested that extra-pharmacological factors such as set and setting matter, and that personality may shape some subjective aspects of the psychedelic state, but it is still unclear which personality traits are linked to which specific sensory effects. There is also disagreement in the literature about how important sensory phenomena themselves are for therapeutic outcomes, which strengthens the case for studying what predicts their intensity. Boardman and colleagues set out to examine whether personality traits are associated with the intensity of a range of sensory distortions during the acute psychedelic state. Their main aim was to test correlations between five-factor personality traits and trait absorption, on the one hand, and the reported intensity of 20 different sensory effects, on the other. The study was exploratory, but the authors hypothesised that personality variables would show significant associations with at least some of these sensory features and would help predict their intensity. The paper is framed as a survey-based study of psychedelic users in Aotearoa New Zealand, with an emphasis on whether personality testing might eventually help anticipate acute responses to psychedelics.

Methods

The researchers conducted an anonymous online survey approved by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee. Data were collected between 25 April 2023 and 21 September 2023 using REDCap. Participants were recruited through flyers in Ōtepoti/Dunedin and advertisements on social media and online forums. Eligibility required participants to be at least 18 years old, fluent in English, resident in Aotearoa for at least 1 year, and to have used at least one listed psychedelic in Aotearoa, including DMT, LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, salvia divinorum, or a 2C-family drug. The survey covered demographics, drug-use patterns, personality, and previous psychedelic experiences. Personality was measured using the 60-item IPIP-NEO-60 for the Big Five traits and the 34-item Tellegen Absorption Scale, which assesses sensitivity to altered states, vivid imagery, and related experiences. The outcome set for this article consisted of 20 sensory features of psychedelic experiences, such as visual trails, breathing objects, colour enhancement, auditory or tactile hallucinations, out-of-body experiences, and synaesthesia. Participants were asked about either their most intense psychedelic experience or their typical experience, depending on how experienced they were. Those with four or more psychedelic experiences reported typical intensity, whereas those with fewer than four reported intensity during their most intense experience. The study also collected information on typical and intense doses, which were coded into five levels from microdose to very high dose using reference information and assumptions where needed. Responses that could not be coded were removed. Of 770 initial respondents, 426 remained for the correlation analyses. Because some participants had inadequate dosage data, the regression analyses were limited to 327 participants. The authors used Spearman’s correlation analyses and stepwise linear regression models in SPSS 27. The regression models included age, sex, social setting, physical setting, typical dosage, intense dosage, trait absorption, and the five Big Five domains. The goal was to identify which personality variables predicted the intensity of each sensory feature after accounting for setting and dose.

Results

The final sample for the correlational analyses comprised 426 participants, with a near-even split between men and women and a mean age of 29.66 years. Most participants identified as White/European, and the most commonly reported typical psychedelic context was with a small group of close friends, usually at home or in another home, with outdoor or nature settings also common. In terms of experience frequency, the sample included a mix of relatively inexperienced and more frequent users. In the correlation analyses, trait absorption was the most consistently related personality variable. It was significantly associated with the intensity of all sensory features except psychoses and disgusting visuals. Several correlations were moderate or near-moderate in size, including field-of-vision changes (r = 0.300), visual acuity enhancement (r = 0.348), experiences of other worlds or dimensions (r = 0.315), and synaesthesia (r = 0.332). Other relatively strong associations for absorption included out-of-body experiences, beautiful visuals, and olfactory hallucinations. Among the Big Five traits, extraversion showed the clearest pattern of associations, although these were still weak overall, with correlations for gustatory hallucinations, beautiful visuals, and colour enhancement. Openness had only a few small associations, including a positive link with beautiful visuals and tactile hallucinations and a slight negative association with psychoses. Neuroticism, agreeableness, and conscientiousness each showed only a small number of weak correlations, with conscientiousness negatively related to disgusting visuals and positively related to colour enhancement. In the regression analyses, nine sensory features were significantly predicted by models that included personality variables. Social setting, physical setting, and dosage appeared to be stronger predictors than personality overall. Physical settings at festivals were strongly associated with greater intensity of experiences of other worlds or dimensions, and being at a festival also predicted that feature in the regression models. The text also reports that social setting was significantly predictive of reduced intensity of objects breathing and beautiful visuals compared with being at home. Trait absorption contributed small but significant predictive value in all nine of the reported models. Extraversion appeared in three of the nine models, and agreeableness in one. Neuroticism and conscientiousness did not add unique predictive value for the relevant outcomes. The authors emphasise that the beta estimates for personality variables were relatively low compared with those for setting and dosage. Overall, the results suggest that personality is associated with how intensely some sensory psychedelic effects are experienced, but the associations were modest rather than large.

Discussion

Boardman and colleagues interpret the findings as evidence that personality traits are linked to the intensity of several sensory features during the acute psychedelic state, particularly trait absorption. They note that nearly all of the 20 sensory features correlated with at least one personality variable, and that nine features were predicted by regression models that included personality, although the explained variance was limited. In their view, absorption stands out as the most robust personality-related predictor, supporting earlier research suggesting that absorption is associated with sensitivity to altered states, vivid imagery, and stronger psychedelic experiences more generally. The authors regard the Big Five findings as less consistent and less definitive. They say the lack of stronger effects for openness was somewhat surprising given earlier research, and suggest that openness may be more relevant to cognitive and emotional aspects of the psychedelic experience, such as mystical experiences, than to sensory distortions. Extraversion showed some associations, including the strongest Big Five correlations in the study, but the pattern was not fully aligned with earlier work. Neuroticism was largely not predictive, apart from a small association with disgusting visuals, which the authors relate cautiously to earlier findings on challenging experiences. Agreeableness and conscientiousness were only weakly related to outcomes, and the conscientiousness finding for disgusting visuals was described as seemingly inconsistent with personality theory. The authors stress that the direct effects of personality were small compared with other factors such as social setting, physical setting, and dosage. They argue that personality may function more as a moderator than a direct cause, influencing choices about setting, dose, and harm-reduction behaviour rather than directly determining the experience. They also highlight several limitations: the study relied on retrospective self-report, which may be affected by recall bias, acquiescence bias, and sampling bias; detailed mental health diagnoses were not collected; some sensory items had obvious emotional valence, which may have influenced responses; dose coding relied on assumptions that may have reduced accuracy; important variables such as route of administration, pre-experience mood, and motivations were not measured; and the loss of data from those with more than 100 psychedelic occasions may limit generalisability. Despite these limitations, the authors suggest that personality measures, especially absorption, could be useful in future prediction tools aimed at anticipating acute reactions to psychedelics and thereby helping to minimise risks and maximise therapeutic benefits.

Conclusion

what this research adds to the literatur 14:01 This study adds to a small body of research on how individual differences shape the psychedelic experience, showing that personality traits, especially absorption, are linked to how intensely people feel sensory effects, but only modestly. Its main contribution is the finding that setting and dose matter far more than personality, which tempers the idea that a personality test alone could predict how someone will respond.

View full paper sections

| RECRUITMENT

Ethical approval for this research was granted by the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (ET23/032). The data analysed in this article is a subset of data collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Otagobetween 25 April 2023 and 21 September 2023. Participants were recruited through flyers posted around the city of Ōtepoti/Dunedin, and through advertisements posted on online forums such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter) and Reddit (r/NewZealand). Participants eligible for participation were required to: be at least 18 years old, speak English fluently, have lived in Aotearoa for at least 1 year, and have taken one of the following psychedelic drugs while in Aotearoa: dimethyltryptamine, LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, salvia divinorum or drugs in the 2C family (e.g., 2C-B, 2C-E). Participants who completed the survey were prompted with the opportunity to enter their email address into a prize draw to win 1 of 5 $100NZD e-vouchers. These email addresses were kept separate from any survey data to maintain anonymity. Winners were randomly selected after data collection was completed. Seven hundred and seventy participants initially engaged with the survey. Due to an unknown issue with the display logic, data from participants who indicated that they had used psychedelics on more than 100 occasions was lost (n = 49). Data from other participants who initiated the survey was removed due to: (i) insufficient completion of the survey (n = 210); (ii) failed attention checks (n = 37); and (iii) inadequate detail on required questions (n = 48). Data from 426 participants remained and formed the basis of the analyses.

| DESIGN AND VARIABLES

After reading an information form and providing consent, eligible participants were presented with the main body of the survey which consisted of five sections: demographic questions, general questions on drug-use behaviours, the IPIP-NEO-60, the 34-item TASand questions regarding the subjective features of users' psychedelic experiences. The order of presentation for the IPIP-NEO-60 and TAS was randomised before the survey was published. The IPIP-NEO-60is a 60-item self-report questionnaire of the five domains of personality (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness); 12 items, each with a 5point Likert scale, relate to each of the 5 domains. Scores for each of the 12 items are summated (with several items being reverse coded). The final result is a score for each of the 5 domains with a maximum of 60 and a minimum of 12. Higher scores in a given domain correspond to a greater intensity for that domain and its associated characteristics. The TASis a 34-item multidimensional self-report questionnaire which examines individuals' scores in the personality domain of absorption. The 34 items are all true/false, with 'true' responses coded as 1, and 'false' responses coded as 0. The final scores range from 0 to 34, with higher scores representing increased absorption. The final survey section which examined the subjective features explored three categories of features: (i) socio-cognitive; (ii) emotional; and (iii) sensory. The current article focuses only on analyses of results regarding sensory items which included 20 items: morphing shapes, trails, objects 'breathing', colour enhancement, fractals, objects 'melting', field of vision (FOV) changes, visual acuity enhancement, out-of-body experiences, experiences of other worlds/dimensions, psychoses, synaesthesia, beautiful visuals, disgusting visuals, terrifying visuals, sad visuals, auditory hallucinations, tactile hallucinations, olfactory hallucinations and gustatory hallucinations. The intensity of each of these 20 sensory features was examined in either participants' most intense psychedelics experience to date, or their typical psychedelics experience. Here, differential display logic was used. Primarily, this was used to differentiate the questions presented to 'experienced' participants (those who had used psychedelics on four or more occasions), to those presented to 'inexperienced' participants (those who had used psychedelics on fewer than four occasions). Experienced participants were asked to report the typical intensity of a given feature during their typical psychedelic experience-that is, the experience induced by their typical dose of their most used psychedelic within their typical set and setting. Given their low number of total experiences, it was decided that inexperienced psychedelic users would not have a 'typical experience' (in the same way as more experienced consumers) on which to base these responses. Therefore, they were presented questions where they were asked to report the intensity of a given sensory feature during their most intense psychedelic experience. The decision to select four psychedelic experiences as the threshold to distinguish between 'experienced' and 'inexperienced' participants was based on previous discussions and interviews with psychedelic users in New Zealand. All survey items regarding the intensity of subjective features were recorded using either a 5-or 6-point Likert scale. Data from 'inexperienced' participants' responses to the question of the intensity of a sensory feature during their most intense psychedelic experience was combined with data from 'experienced' participants' responses to the question of the intensity of that sensory feature during their typical psychedelic experience. These combined variables were used in the correlation and regression analyses. There were two questions which surveyed the dosages of psychedelics that participants used. 'Typical dosage' surveyed the dose of a specific psychedelic which participants tended to use most often. 'Intense dosage' surveyed the dose administered which resulted in participants' most intense psychedelic experience. Information on how these responses were coded can be found in Table. A text box was presented for both survey items. Most participants gave adequately detailed responses. These were coded on a scale of one to five based on information from the 'vaults' of the popular online psychedelic forum Erowid. The codes are as follows: 1 = microdose, 2 = low dose, 3 = standard dose, 4 = high dose, 5 = very high dose. The number of individuals in each category is outlined in Figure. Some participants did not give adequately detailed information to be sorted into these five categories. For example, doses of LSD were often reported in 'tabs' (e.g., 'half a tab'). Out of necessity, the research team made several assumptions in order to code these responses. For example, '1 tab' of LSD was, based on anecdotal report, assumed to be 100ug. Responses pertaining to dosages of psilocybin mushrooms and mescaline cacti were coded on an individual case-by-case basis. Those responses that could not be coded despite these assumptions were given a dose code of zero and were removed.

| STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Survey data was analysed using IBM SPSS 27. Spearman's correlation analyses and stepwise linear regression analyses were also conducted. All 20 sensory variables and all six personality variables met the eligibility criteria for the relevant regression analyses outlined by previous research. For the linear regression analyses, the following variables were included in each model: age, sex, social setting, physical setting, 'typical dosage', 'intense dosage', trait absorption, trait neuroticism (N), trait extraversion (E), trait openness (O), trait agreeableness (A) and trait conscientiousness (C). For typical physical and social setting, 'at home' and 'alone' were used as the reference categories respectively. These variables were used to predict the intensity of each of the 20 sensory features.

| RESULTS

Data from 426 participants was used to conduct the correlation analysis while data from 327 participants was used in the linear regression analyses; participants with inadequate responses to dosage questions were removed from the regression analyses. The sample was a near-even split of males and females (49.1% and 49.8% respectively). The mean age of the sample was 29.66. Participants overwhelming identified as White/European (85.70%), followed by Māori (11.70%) and other European (11.0%). More details on sample demographics can be found in Table. Regarding psychedelic use patterns, participants reported that their typical social setting for psychedelics-use is 'with a small group of close friends' (51.4%). The social settings 'with a single partner', 'alone', 'at a nightclub/party', 'with a group of friends/ acquaintances' were reported as the typical social setting for ~10%-15% of participants. Similarly, participants reported typically using psychedelics at home (theirs or a friend's home; 47.7%), and outdoors/in nature (32.4%). Regarding frequency of psychedelic use, participants reported using psychedelics on 11-20 occasions (20.0%), followed by 21-50 occasions (19.7%), 4-6 occasions (19.2%), and 7-10 occasions (16.9%), 3 or fewer occasions (15.7%), and 51-100 occasions (8.5%). Tabledisplays the Spearman correlation coefficients between the six personality domains and the intensity of 20 different sensory features of the psychedelic experience. First and foremost, trait absorption exhibited significant correlations with the intensity of all sensory features except psychoses and disgusting visuals. Most of the observed correlation values were relatively low; however, four exhibited correlation coefficients R > 0.3, showing a small but significant correlation. Here, trait absorption was positively correlated with the intensity of FOV changes (r = 0.300), visual acuity enhancement (r = 0.348), visions of other worlds/dimensions (r = 0.315), and synaesthesia (r = 0.332). The correlations observed for the intensity of out-ofbody experiences (r = 0.288), beautiful visuals (r = 0.263), and olfactory hallucinations (r = 0.266) were also relatively high compared to several of the other associations. Apart from trait absorption, trait extraversion exhibited the strongest correlations with the intensity of sensory features including gustatory hallucinations (r = 0.210), beautiful visuals (r = 0.192), and colour enhancement (r = 0.141) (Table). Trait openness, despite typically being well correlated with trait absorption, exhibited relatively few significant correlations, the strongest of which were the intensity of beautiful visuals (r = 0.175) and tactile hallucinations (r = 0.134); it also showed a slight negative association with the intensity of psychoses (r = -0.109). However, it is noted that these correlations are small at best. The three remaining Big Five personality domains exhibited only a few significant correlations, all of which were weak. These included correlations between trait neuroticism and the intensity of disgusting visuals (r = 0.109), trait agreeableness and the intensity of beautiful visuals (r = 0.130), trait conscientiousness and the intensity of colour enhancement (r = 0.159), and trait conscientiousness and the intensity of disgusting visuals (r = -0.144). significantly predictive of reduced intensity of objects 'breathing' and beautiful visuals (compared to an 'at home' setting). Physical settings at festivals were strongly predictive of increased intensity of experiences of other dimensions/worlds. Notably, trait absorption provided a small but significant predictive value to all nine of the discussed models. Trait extraversion was present in three of the nine models, and trait agreeableness in only one. The analyses suggest that traits neuroticism and conscientiousness do not provide unique predictive value for the intensity of the respective subjective features. It is important to note that while personality variables were present in several of the final regression models, beta-estimates for personality variables were relatively low compared to setting and dosage variables.

| DISCUSSION

The findings of the current study reveal associations between personality traits and the intensity of several sensory features during the APS. Consistent with the hypothesis, nearly all of the 20 examined sensory features exhibited significant correlations with one or more personality variables, and nine of the features were significantly predicted by models which included personality variables (with R 2 ≥ 0.1). Consistent with previous research, trait absorption was associated with a general increase in the intensity of sensory features. It exhibited associations with 18 of the 20 sensory features, four of which were at least moderate in strength. These findings provide further supporting evidence for the role of trait absorption in sensitivity to altered states of cognition (particularly psychedelics), vivid mental imagery, and its promotive effect on psychedelics as outlined by Haijen et al.. Furthermore, trait absorption was found to be a significant predictor of the intensity of several different sensory features, although this was often in combination with other non-personality variables. The presence of trait absorption in the final models despite its relatively low strength indicates that it is a significant predictor of various sensory features of the psychedelics experience, albeit in a small way that is not explained by non-personality variables like dosage and setting. The observed associations between the Big Five personality traits and the intensity of sensory features were less definitive. None of the Big Five domains exhibited correlation coefficients of moderate or strong strength (r > 0.3); all were weak, if significant. Big Five domains were, however, present in several final regression models with beta-estimates comparable to those of trait absorption. Several of the findings related to the Big Five domains were unexpected; the lack of significant associations with trait openness was somewhat inconsistent with previous researchwhich highlighted its role as a determinant of acute reactions to psychedelics. It may be that trait openness plays more of a role in determining the cognitive and emotional reactions to psychedelics like the occasioning of MEs, rather than the sensory features. Moreover, it is likely that there was substantial crossover between the predictive utility of trait absorption and trait openness, meaning only one was necessary to include in the final model. Similarly, the associations exhibited by trait extraversion are somewhat inconsistent with previous evidence. In the current study, trait extraversion exhibited the strongest correlations with the intensity of sensory features out of any of the Big Five domains-the strongest being its association with gustatory hallucinations. The overall finding that extraversion is more associated with reactions to psychedelics than other Big Five domains is consistent with findings from Studerus et al.. However, Studerus et al.found that trait extraversion was associated with increased reports of audio-visual synaesthesia. Whereas in the current study, trait extraversion was not associated with the intensity of synaesthesia nor auditory hallucinations. Trait neuroticism did not exhibit any predictive value and was correlated with the intensity of very few sensory features. Previous research by Barrett and colleaguesexamined the associations between trait neuroticism and acute reactions to psychedelic experiences and found associations between trait neuroticism and increased challenging experience under the influence of psychedelics. While the current study only examined sensory features, there was a significant correlation between trait neuroticism and the intensity of disgusting visuals. However, no such association was found for other sensory features linked with challenging experiences such as terrifying visuals, sad visuals or psychoses. There is little previous evidence linking trait conscientiousness and/or trait agreeableness to acute reactions to psychedelics. Similarly, in the current study, these two domains exhibited very few significant correlations with the intensity of sensory features, and only trait agreeableness was present in any of the final regression models; once again, its beta coefficients were low, and the overall variance explained was low. Interestingly, the observed relationship between trait conscientiousness and the intensity of disgusting visuals is ostensibly inconsistent with the underlying personality theory. Trait conscientiousness is generally associated with disgust sensitivity, with conscientious individuals being more sensitive to feelings of disgust. Yet, in the current study, trait conscientiousness was negatively correlated with the intensity of disgusting visuals. Here, it may be that conscientious individuals are more likely to engage in harm reduction behaviours that facilitate a positive psychedelic experience and thus are less likely to experience negative sensory features such as disgusting visuals. Previous research has found that individuals low in conscientiousness tend to engage in greater risk-taking behaviours and increased drug use. These findings provide evidence of an association between personality and the intensity of sensory features of the APS. However, they also illustrate that the magnitude of this effect is relatively weak, and that other factors, such as social setting, physical setting and typical dosage, likely play a much stronger role in determining the intensity of acute sensory features and acute reactions to psychedelics in general. Here, it is likely that the effect of personality on the intensity of subjective effects during the APS is a moderating effect more so than a direct effect-with personality variables having an influence on social setting preferences, physical setting preferences, dosage tendencies, harm-reduction practices, etc. One noteworthy finding here is the prevalence of trait absorption in the final regression models. Its inclusion in all nine of the displayed models attests to its unique and significant contributions to models for the prediction of such sensory effects. As such, it seems appropriate that measures of trait absorption should be considered when constructing tools for the prediction of intensity of certain aspects of the APS. It is important to consider the limitations present with retrospective self-report questionnaires. It is likely that several biases influence the participants' response patterns. The most problematic instance of this is any biases stemming from personality traits themselves. For example, it may be that several of the observed associations may stem from the fact that individuals high in certain personality traits are more likely to respond in a certain pattern; individuals high in trait extraversion may be more likely to report a higher intensity of gustatory hallucination, resulting in an observed correlation where no real association is present. Secondly, acquiescence bias or 'yes' bias may have been an issue as well; this too could be moderated by personality traits such as trait openness. Thirdly, sampling biases likely occurred to some extent, where individuals high in certain traits (such as trait openness) were more likely to engage in the survey. Fourthly, although the current research collected data on the prevalence of mental disorders in the sample, specific diagnoses were not captured and were not included in any analyses. Future research could examine the interactions between the sensory effects of psychedelics and mental disorders, but this was beyond the scope of this research. Moreover, it should be acknowledged that, while the current study mainly examined sensory features rather than emotional features of the APS, certain sensory variables had obvious emotional valency. Variables such as 'beautiful visuals', 'terrifying visuals', and 'disgusting visuals' were included in the survey. The rationale behind their inclusion is that during the APS, ostensibly emotional sensory effects may be experienced without a specific emotional reaction. That is, one might experience disgusting visuals without eliciting a reaction of disgust. The obvious emotional valence of these items may skew the role of personality variables observed in the regression models given the direct effect of personality on emotional states. The role of personality variables on the intensity of these distortions during the APS may simply be an effect of personality, unrelated to any interaction with psychedelics. Furthermore, the necessary assumptions made regarding participants' dosages, and the categorising of dosages into levels from one to five, likely reduced the accuracy of dosage variables and may have contributed to a reduction in their predictive strength during the regression modelling. In the future, participants in similar research should be presented more accurate means of reporting their dosage. Finally, other important determinant information such as the route of administration, participants' mood prior to their experiences, and motivations for use were not collected. These factors are known to influence reactions to psychedelics, and it may be that the usefulness of personality variables as predictors is significantly reduced when these factors are included in regression models for the prediction of acute reactions to psychedelics. Finally, the loss of data from the participants who had used psychedelics on more than 100 occasions likely introduced some bias whereby the findings from the analyses may be less applicable to those with 100 or more psychedelics use occasions. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of significant associations between personality variables and the intensity of sensory features of the psychedelic experience. However, the strength of the direct correlation is likely weak compared to other extrapharmacological factors. It is important to consider the role of personality variables primarily as moderators rather than mediators of the more determinant factors of acute reactions to psychedelics. Nevertheless, the ease with which personality measures can be administered, particularly trait absorption, means they could be efficiently included in measures pertaining to psychedelics. As the scientific and clinical use of psychedelics increases, tools for better prediction of acute reactions to psychedelics will only become increasingly useful to minimise risks and maximise therapeutic benefits.

Full Text PDF

Full Paper PDF

Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.

Study Details

References (16)

Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom

Psychedelics, sociality, and human evolution

Rodríguez Arce, J. M., Winkelman, M. J. · Frontiers in Psychology (2021)

78 cited
Predicting Reactions to Psychedelic Drugs: A Systematic Review of States and Traits Related to Acute Drug Effects

Aday, J. S., Davis, A. K., Mitzkovitz, C. M. et al. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2021)

224 cited
Sustained effects of single doses of classical psychedelics in humans

Knudsen, G. M. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)

53 cited
814 cited
Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression a SPECT study

Sanches, R. F., Osório, F. L., Dos Santos, R. G. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2016)

461 cited
Classic Psychedelics in Addiction Treatment: The Case for Psilocybin in Tobacco Smoking Cessation

Johnson, M. W. · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (2022)

31 cited
Safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases

Gasser, P., Holstein, D., Michel, Y. et al. · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (2014)

744 cited
Predicting responses to psychedelics: a prospective study

Haijen, E. C. H. M., Kaelen, M., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)

418 cited
Set and setting predict psychopathology, wellbeing and meaningfulness of psychedelic experiences: a correlational study

Borkel, L. F., Rojas-Hernández, J., Henríquez-Hernández, L. A. et al. · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (2023)

37 cited
Show all 16 references
Phenomenology, Structure, and Dynamic of Psychedelic States

Preller, K. H., Vollenweider, F. X. · Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs (2016)

284 cited
Serotonergic psychedelics and personality: A systematic review of contemporary research

Bouso, J. C., Dos Santos, R. G., Hallak, J. E. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2018)

133 cited
Prediction of psilocybin response in healthy volunteers

Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)

370 cited
Neuroticism is associated with challenging experiences with psilocybin mushrooms

Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Personality and Individual Differences (2017)

95 cited