Psychedelics: The pathway to implementation in the European healthcare systems
This review (2025) examines the challenges of integrating psychedelic therapies into European healthcare systems, highlighting that beyond obtaining regulatory approval, these treatments must also pass health technology assessments in individual countries, a process complicated by the lack of studies comparing psychedelics to existing treatments and the difficulty of evaluating therapies that combine drugs with psychotherapy.
Authors
- Henrik Jungaberle
- Gerhard Gründer
Published
Abstract
The integration of psychedelic therapies into European healthcare is a nuanced process that involves not only obtaining European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval but also successfully navigating Health Technology Assessment (HTA) evaluations across member states. After EMA approval, which focuses on the safety, efficacy, and quality of the therapeutic, HTA agencies assess these therapies for their “added therapeutic value,” considering factors like cost-effectiveness, clinical outcomes, and overall societal impact. Each country’s HTA, including the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Germany’s Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), and France’s Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), plays a pivotal role in determining reimbursement and access to these treatments. An added challenge is that HTA bodies in Europe often require active comparator studies rather than just placebo controls to establish a treatment’s advantage over existing standard of care – a particular hurdle for psychedelic-assisted therapies, where controlled trials against active comparators are almost completely lacking. Furthermore, psychedelics are typically integrated with psychotherapy, adding complexity to HTA evaluations, as few frameworks currently assess the value of combination therapies within healthcare systems. Creating a standardized HTA approach or a unified European guideline for such novel treatments could promote equitable access across countries, helping to overcome the discrepancies in market access and patient reach across Europe.
Research Summary of 'Psychedelics: The pathway to implementation in the European healthcare systems'
Introduction
The authors outline growing scientific and clinical interest in classic psychedelics (psilocybin, LSD, DMT and derivatives) and MDMA as potential treatments for a range of mental health conditions, with the largest evidence base currently for psilocybin in major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). They note that single or a small number of dosing sessions combined with psychotherapy have produced rapid antidepressant effects and, in some follow-ups, sustained improvements lasting months. However, evidence gaps remain for long-term maintenance, active-comparator effectiveness and the optimal role and intensity of psychotherapeutic support within psychedelic-assisted therapies. This paper examines the specific regulatory and health-technology-assessment (HTA) challenges affecting the implementation of psychedelic therapies in European healthcare systems. The authors set out to describe how EMA approval interacts with national HTA processes, to illustrate these dynamics using recent drug case studies (notably esketamine), to review the current state of clinical development for psychedelics in Phase 3, and to identify the evidentiary and policy steps they consider necessary for equitable access across Europe.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Gründer, G., Mertens, L. J., Spangemacher, M., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Jungaberle, H. (2026). Psychedelics: The pathway to implementation in the European healthcare systems. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 102, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2025.11.007
References (16)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Avancena, A. L. V., Vuong, L., Kahn, J. G. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2025)
Butlen-Ducuing, F., McCulloch, D. E-W., Haberkamp, M. et al. · Lancet (2023)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Erritzoe, D., Barba, T., Greenway, K. T. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2024)
Gasser, P., Holstein, D., Michel, Y. et al. · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (2014)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Goodwin, G. M., Malievskaia, E., Fonzo, G. A. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2023)
Gründer, G., Brand, M., Mertens, L. J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2024)
Davis, A. K., Streeter Barrett, F., Cosimano, M. P. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Marseille, E., Kahn, J. G., Yazar-Klosinski, B. et al. · PLOS ONE (2020)
Show all 16 referencesShow fewer
Mccrone, P., Fisher, H., Knight, C. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2023)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Reif, A., Bitter, I., Buyze, J. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2023)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Rucker, J., Roberts, C. A., Seynaeve, M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Schindowski, E. M., Jungwirth, J., Schuldt, A. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.