Effect of psilocybin versus escitalopram on depression symptom severity in patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: observational 6-month follow-up of a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial
This 6-month follow-up of a Phase II, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (n=59) finds sustained improvements in depressive symptoms for both psilocybin therapy (PT) and escitalopram treatment (ET) for moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD). PT shows greater improvements in psychosocial functioning, meaning in life, and psychological connectedness compared to ET at the 6-month follow-up.
Authors
- Robin Carhart-Harris
- David Nutt
- Christopher Timmermann
Published
Abstract
Background
Psilocybin therapy (PT) produces rapid and persistent antidepressant effects in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the long-term effects of PT have never been compared with gold-standard treatments for MDD such as pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy alone or in combination.
Methods
This is a 6-month follow-up study of a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial involving patients with moderate-to-severe MDD. Participants were recruited from a hospital in the UK. Male or female patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV), moderate to severe depression (HAM-D ≥17), no MRI or SSRI contraindications, confirmed diagnosis by a GP or mental healthcare professional, aged 18-80, and competent in English were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either two 25 mg doses of the psychedelic drug psilocybin administered orally combined with psychological support (‘psilocybin therapy’ or PT) and bookended by further support or a 6-week course of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram (administered daily at 10 mg for three weeks and 20 mg for the subsequent three weeks) plus matched psychological support (‘escitalopram treatment’ or ET). The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in the score on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) at week 6, which has been reported previously. Herein, we present results at the 6-month follow-up time point. Measures of social functioning, connectedness, and meaning in life constituted the study’s secondary outcomes during follow-up. Safety in the follow-up period was not assessed. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03429075.
Findings
Between January 15th, 2019 and March 20th, 2020, 59 patients were enrolled and 30 (11 females [37%] and 19 males [63%]) were assigned to the psilocybin group and 29 (9 females [31%] and 20 males [69%]) to the escitalopram group. 25 participants in the PT group and 21 in the ET group completed the 6-month follow-up. At the 6-month follow-up, both PT and ET conditions yielded sustained improvements in depressive symptom severity. The mean between-condition difference in QIDS-SR-16 scores at 6-months was 1.51 (95% CI: −1.35, 4.38; p = 0.311). Secondary outcomes demonstrated that PT had greater mean between-condition differences in functioning (WSAS: −7.46; 95% CI: −12.4, −2.47; p < 0.001), psychological connectedness (WCS: 11.02; 95% CI: 1.25, 20.83; p = 0.033), and meaning in life (MLQ: 4.86; 95% CI: 0.67, 9.05; p = 0.021) compared to ET.
Interpretation
Six-week intensive treatments with either psilocybin or escitalopram (with psychological support) for MDD were associated with long-term improvements in depressive symptom severity. The greater degree of improvement in the PT arm at follow-up on psychosocial functioning, meaning in life, and psychological connectedness suggests warrant future research. However, these results are descriptive and should be interpreted with caution. Key limitations of the study include its suboptimal power to detect small but meaningful differences between treatments, missing data, the potential use of additional interventions during the follow-up period, and reliance on self-reported treatment assessments. These factors may affect the interpretation of the study findings and should be considered when evaluating the results.
Research Summary of 'Effect of psilocybin versus escitalopram on depression symptom severity in patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: observational 6-month follow-up of a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial'
Introduction
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of global disability and carries a high risk of relapse after initial remission. Previous trials have shown that one or two high doses of psilocybin administered with psychological support can produce rapid antidepressant effects that may persist for months, but long-term outcomes have rarely been compared directly with established treatments such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) plus psychotherapy. Erritzoe and colleagues set out to examine the six-month naturalistic follow-up of a Phase II, double-blind, randomised trial that contrasted two high-dose psilocybin sessions plus psychological support (psilocybin therapy; PT) with a six-week course of escitalopram combined with matched psychological support (escitalopram treatment; ET). The aim was to evaluate sustained changes in depressive symptom severity and secondary measures including work and social functioning, psychological connectedness, flourishing, and meaning in life, and to characterise potential differences between the two treatment arms over six months after the trial endpoint.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Erritzoe, D., Barba, T., Greenway, K. T., Murphy, R., Martell, J., Giribaldi, B., Timmermann, C., Murphy-Beiner, A., Jones, M. B., Nutt, D., Weiss, B., & Carhart-Harris, R. (2024). Effect of psilocybin versus escitalopram on depression symptom severity in patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder: observational 6-month follow-up of a phase 2, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. eClinicalMedicine, 76, 102799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102799
References (26)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Greenway, K. T., Garel, N., Jerome, L. et al. · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology (2020)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M., Idialu-Ikato, K. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Nour, M. R., Evans, J., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2016)
Agin-Liebes, G. I., Zeifman, R. J., Luoma, J. B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Show all 26 referencesShow fewer
Peill, J. M., Trinci, K. E., Kettner, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Barba, T., Buehler, S., Kettner, H. et al. · BJPsych Open (2022)
Barba, T., Kettne, H., Radu, C. et al. · Scientific Reports (2024)
Watts, R., Kettner, H., Gandy, S. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2022)
Davis, A. K., Streeter Barrett, F., Cosimano, M. P. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, &. M., Day, C. M. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Chandaria, S., Erritzoe, D. E. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2023)
Gründer, G., Brand, M., Mertens, L. J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2024)
Simonsson, O., Carhart-Harris, R., Davis, A. K. et al. · Psychiatry Research (2023)
Cavanna, F., Muller, S., de la Fuente, L. A. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2022)
Fadiman, J., Korb, S. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2019)
Szigeti, B., Kartner, L., Blemings, A. et al. · eLife (2021)
Wall, M. B., Demetriou, L., Giribaldi, B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2025)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Cited By (9)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Williams, Z. J., Barnett, H., Szigeti, B. · JAMA Psychiatry (2026)
Jacobs, E., Zahid, Z., Hinkle, J. et al. · BMJ (2026)
Gründer, G., Mertens, L. J., Spangemacher, M. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2026)
Ellis, S., Bostian, C., Donnelly, A. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2025)
Pellegrini, L., Fineberg, N. A., O'Connor, S. et al. · Comprehensive Psychiatry (2025)
Avancena, A. L. V., Vuong, L., Kahn, J. G. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2025)
Williams, Z. J., Barnett, H., Szigeti, B. · OSF Preprints (2025)
Roseby, W., Kettner, H., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2025)
Dougherty, R. F., Clarke, P., Kuc, J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.