Special considerations for evaluating psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy in vulnerable populations
This report (2022) explores the challenges and opportunities associated with evaluating psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy (PAP) in vulnerable populations. The authors propose that working with vulnerable populations requires special attention to their context. Recommendations for future research include an emphasis on recruitment strategies, the appropriate communication and assessment of subjective effects, building a therapeutic alliance, multicultural competence, and flexible study designs.
Authors
- Albert Garcia-Romeu
- Peter Hendricks
- Brian Anderson
Published
Abstract
Psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy shows potential transdiagnostic efficacy for a range of mental health conditions. Though vulnerable populations bear a disproportionate mental health burden, they have been largely neglected in the clinical psilocybin literature. However, if the field is to best respond to the diverse needs of individuals from vulnerable populations, care must be taken to ensure these individuals are represented in the empirical research. This report calls attention to this concern by detailing the challenges and opportunities associated with evaluating psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy in vulnerable populations. First, we show how working with vulnerable populations must be considered in the context of an often-problematic past and differential exposure to and experience with classic psychedelics. We then provide actionable recommendations for future research testing psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy in vulnerable populations, including an emphasis on recruitment strategies, the appropriate communication and assessment of subjective effects, building therapeutic alliance, multicultural competence, and flexible study designs. On these premises we call for future work in this area, underscoring that there is vast room for improvement and expansion in this rapidly advancing field of study.
Research Summary of 'Special considerations for evaluating psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy in vulnerable populations'
Introduction
Ortiz and colleagues note that psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy has accumulating evidence of efficacy across several mental health conditions, yet people from vulnerable populations—defined here as underresourced social groups at elevated risk for poor health outcomes—have been largely underrepresented in clinical psilocybin research. The Introduction situates this gap within broader calls for multicultural competence in mental health care, emphasising the importance of understanding patients' lived experience and provider identity when working with groups such as socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, people experiencing homelessness, racial/ethnic minorities, sexual and gender minorities (SGM), older adults, people with disabilities or chronic conditions (for example, HIV), and people involved with the criminal justice system. This report, presented as an invited talk at the NIH Psilocybin Research Speaker Series, sets out to provide a concise primer on advancing culturally informed evaluation of psilocybin treatments in vulnerable populations. Rather than exhaustively treating any single group, the authors aim to highlight cross-cutting historical, ethical, methodological, and practical issues and to offer actionable recommendations to improve recruitment, assessment, therapeutic practice, and study design when working with these populations.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Ortiz, C. E., Dourron, H. M., Sweat, N. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., MacCarthy, S., Anderson, B. T., & Hendricks, P. S. (2022). Special considerations for evaluating psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy in vulnerable populations. Neuropharmacology, 214, 109127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109127
References (11)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Anderson, B. T., Danforth, A. L., Daroff, R. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2020)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Family, N., Hendricks, P. S., Williams, L. T. J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2022)
Hendricks, P. S. · International Review of Psychiatry (2018)
Hendricks, P. S., Crawford, M. S., Cropsey, K. L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Johnson, M. W., Hendricks, P. S., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2019)
Mertens, L. J., Preller, K. H. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2021)
Russ, S. L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Maruyama, G. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Show all 11 referencesShow fewer
Smith, D., Faber, S., Buchanan, N. T. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2022)
Cited By (2)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Henningfield, J. E., Barrett, F. S., Evans, S. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2026)
Kopra, E., Ferris, J. A., Winstock, A. R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.