Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and subjective effects of 50, 75, and 100 µg LSD in healthy participants within a novel intervention paradigm: A proof-of-concept study
This trial (n=32) assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and subjective effects of 50, 75, and 100 µg LSD in healthy adults within a novel intervention paradigm. Participants received 50 (n = 3), 75 (n = 7), 100 (n = 3) LSD, 50 µg followed by 75 µg LSD (n = 9) 1 week apart, or placebo followed by a 75 µg LSD (n = 10) 1 week apart. No serious adverse events were reported, This data indicates that LSD is safe and well-tolerated with mild adverse events reported.
Authors
- Peter Hendricks
- David Luke
- Neiloufar Family
Published
Abstract
Background
Classic psychedelics hold promise as therapeutics for psychiatric disorders, but require scalable intervention protocols. This proof-of-concept study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and subjective effects of 50, 75, and 100 µg lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in healthy adults within a novel intervention paradigm.
Methods
Up to three participants were administered LSD on the same day in separate rooms, each with a single attendant, after 1 day of preparation. An open-label design and a double-blind placebo-controlled design were used.
Results
Ninety-one per cent of participants completed the study. Thirty-two adults (mean age = 28.8 years) received 50 (n = 3), 75 (n = 7), 100 (n = 3) LSD, 50 µg followed by 75 µg LSD (n = 9) 1 week apart, or placebo followed by a 75 µg LSD (n = 10) 1 week apart. There were no serious adverse events. Twenty-eight per cent of participants experienced at least one expected mild adverse event, with one expected moderate adverse event. The maximum blood plasma levels occurred between 1.2 and 2 h post-administration, with an apparent half-life between 2.8 and 4.3 h. LSD largely induced greater subjective effects versus placebo.
Conclusion
In the current novel intervention paradigm, 50, 75, and 100 µg LSD are tolerable with favourable safety profiles in healthy adults, only mild adverse events during the day of drug administration, and mystical-type subjective experiences. Future studies are needed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, subjective effects, and cost-effectiveness in clinical populations.
Research Summary of 'Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and subjective effects of 50, 75, and 100 µg LSD in healthy participants within a novel intervention paradigm: A proof-of-concept study'
Introduction
Classic psychedelics such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) have re‑emerged as potential therapeutics for psychiatric disorders, but many contemporary clinical protocols are resource intensive and may limit population‑level access. Earlier work suggests LSD has a favourable safety profile across a range of doses and can produce transcendent, mystical‑type experiences that are thought to mediate therapeutic effects, yet conventional trials typically use substantial preparatory and integration contact, two on‑site attendants during acute drug action, and multi‑week interventions that are expensive and time consuming. Family and colleagues set out to evaluate a more scalable intervention paradigm by conducting a Phase I proof‑of‑concept, single‑centre, dose‑escalation study of low‑to‑moderate LSD doses (50, 75 and 100 µg) in healthy adults. The paper reports safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and subjective effects within a protocol that used abbreviated preparation/integration, a single attendant per participant, remote monitoring, group interactions and the option to dose up to three participants on the same day. The investigators hypothesised these doses would be safe and tolerable, produce blood plasma exposures congruent with previous studies, and generate mystical‑type subjective experiences relevant to potential therapeutic mechanisms.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Family, N., Hendricks, P. S., Williams, L. T., Luke, D., Krediet, E., Maillet, E. L., & Raz, S. (2022). Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and subjective effects of 50, 75, and 100 µg LSD in healthy participants within a novel intervention paradigm: A proof-of-concept study. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 36(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811211069103
References (27)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Doss, M. K., Sepeda, N. D. et al. · Scientific Reports (2020)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Kaelen, M., Whalley, M. G. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2014)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Kaelen, M., Bolstridge, M. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Muthukumaraswamy, S., Roseman, L. et al. · PNAS (2016)
Dolder, P. C., Schmid, Y., Haschke, M. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2015)
Dolder, P. C., Schmid, Y., Steuer, A. E. et al. · Clinical Pharmacokinetics (2017)
Family, N., Maillet, E. L., Williams, L. T. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Show all 27 referencesShow fewer
Garcia-Romeu, A., Davis, A. K., Griffiths, R. R. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2020)
Gasser, P., Holstein, D., Michel, Y. et al. · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (2014)
Kirchner, K. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2014)
Hartogsohn, I. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Holze, F., Duthaler, U., Vizeli, P. et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2019)
Holze, F., Vizeli, P., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Johnson, M. W., Hendricks, P. S., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2019)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Krebs, T. S., Johansen, P. Ø. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2012)
Liechti, M. E., Dolder, P. C., Schmid, Y. · Psychopharmacology (2016)
MacLean, K. A., Leoutsakos, J. S., Johnson, M. W. et al. · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2012)
Majic, T., Schmidt, T. T., Gallinat, J. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2015)
Nour, M. R., Evans, J., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2016)
Passie, T., Halpern, J. H., Stichtenoth, D. O. et al. · CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics (2008)
Preller, K. H., Razi, A., Zeidman, P. et al. · PNAS (2019)
Schmid, Y., Enzler, F., Gasser, P. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2015)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Cited By (4)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Ertl, N., Ashraf, I., Azizi, L. et al. · Biorxiv (2025)
Rouaud, A., Calder, A. E., Hasler, G. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Prugger, J., Hirschfeld, T., Majic, T. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Ortiz, C. E., Dourron, H. M., Sweat, N. W. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.