Therapeutic infusions of ketamine: do the psychoactive effects matter?
This double-blind, randomised, inpatient study (n=8) evaluates the mystical and dissociative effects of ketamine in the treatment of cocaine dependant individuals. Ketamine led to significantly greater acute mystical-type effects than the active control, and mediated motivation to quit cocaine 24h post-infusion.
Authors
- Sanjay Mathew
- Elias Dakwar
- Edward Nunes
Published
Abstract
Background
Sub-anesthetic ketamine infusions may benefit a variety of psychiatric disorders, including addiction. Though ketamine engenders transient alterations in consciousness, it is not known whether these alterations influence efficacy. This analysis evaluates the mystical-type effects of ketamine, which may have therapeutic potential according to prior research, and assesses whether these effects mediate improvements in dependence-related deficits, 24 h postinfusion.
Methods
Eight cocaine dependent individuals completed this double-blind, randomized, inpatient study. Three counter-balanced infusions separated by 48 h were received: lorazepam (2 mg) and two doses of ketamine (0.41 mg/kg and 0.71 mg/kg, with the former dose always preceding the latter). Infusions were followed within 15 min by measures of dissociation (Clinician Administered Dissociative Symptoms Scale: CADSS) and mystical-type effects (adapted from Hood's Mysticism Scale: HMS). At baseline and 24 h postinfusion, participants underwent assessments of motivation to stop cocaine (University of Rhode Island Change Assessment) and cue-induced craving (by visual analogue scale for cocaine craving during cue exposure).
Results
Ketamine led to significantly greater acute mystical-type effects (by HMS) relative to the active control lorazepam; ketamine 0.71 mg/kg was associated with significantly higher HMS scores than was the 0.41 mg/kg dose. HMS score, but not CADSS score, was found to mediate the effect of ketamine on motivation to quit cocaine 24 h postinfusion.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that psychological mechanisms may be involved in some of the anti-addiction benefits resulting from ketamine. Future research can evaluate whether the psychoactive effects of ketamine influence improvements in larger samples.
Research Summary of 'Therapeutic infusions of ketamine: do the psychoactive effects matter?'
Introduction
A single sub‑anaesthetic intravenous infusion of ketamine (commonly 0.5 mg/kg over ~40 min) has been shown in prior work to produce rapid antidepressant effects that peak about 24 h after infusion and attenuate by 72 h. Such effects have been attributed to enhanced neuroplasticity, modulation of prefrontal glutamate balance, and changes in default mode network function. Ketamine may therefore also ameliorate dependence‑related deficits by similar biological pathways; the investigators previously reported that ketamine improved low motivation to quit and cue‑induced craving in non‑depressed cocaine‑dependent volunteers. This analysis asks whether the transient psychoactive effects produced by therapeutic ketamine infusions—specifically mystical‑type experiences similar to those elicited by serotonergic hallucinogens—contribute to clinical benefit. Dakwar and colleagues set out to (1) test whether two sub‑anaesthetic intravenous ketamine doses produce dose‑dependent mystical‑type effects measured shortly after infusion, and (2) evaluate whether the intensity of those mystical‑type experiences, as distinct from dissociative symptoms, mediates ketamine’s 24‑hour effects on motivation to quit cocaine and on cue‑induced craving.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Dakwar, E., Anerella, C., Hart, C., Levin, F., Mathew, S., & Nunes, E. (2014). Therapeutic infusions of ketamine: do the psychoactive effects matter?. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 136, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.12.019
References (9)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Krupitsky, E. M., Burakov, A. M., Romanova, T. N. et al. · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (2002)
Krupitsky, E. M., Grinenko, A. Y. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (1997)
MacLean, K. A., Leoutsakos, J. S., Johnson, M. W. et al. · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2012)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)
Studerus, E., Kometer, M., Hasler, F. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2010)
Vollenweider, F. X., Kometer, M. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2010)
Cited By (23)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Gubser, L. P., Trippel, A. S., Zoelch, N. et al. · Brain Research Bulletin (2026)
Dahan, J. D. C., Dadiomov, D., Bostoen, T. et al. · npj Mental Health Research (2024)
Macconnel, H. A., Earleywine, M., Radowitz, S. · OSF Preprints (2024)
Mathai, D. S., Nayak, S., Yaden, D. B. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2023)
Belser, A. B. · Frontiers in Psychology (2022)
Keeler, J. L., Treasure, J., Juruena, M. F. et al. · Nutrients (2021)
Mollaahmetoglu, O. M., Keeler, J., Ashbullby, K. J. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Rothberg, R. L., Azhari, N., Haug, N. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Olson, D. E. · ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science (2020)
Reiff, C. M., Richman, E. E., Nemeroff, C. B. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2020)
Show all 23 papersShow fewer
Dakwar, E., Levin, F. R., Hart, C. L. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2020)
Dakwar, E., Nunes, E. V., Hart, C. L. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2019)
Best, S. R. D., Pavel, D. G., Haustrup, N. · Heliyon (2019)
Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M., Idialu-Ikato, K. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Martial, C., Cassol, H., Charland-Verville, V, Erowid, E. et al. · Consciousness and Cognition (2019)
Dakwar, E., Nunes, E. V., Hart, C. L. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Ezquerra-Romano, I. I., Lawn, W., Krupitsky, E. M. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Van Schalkwyk, G. I., Wilkinson, S. T., Davidson, L. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2018)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Liu, Y., Lin, D., Wu, B. et al. · Brain Research Bulletin (2016)
Dakwar, E., Hart, C. L., Levin, F. R. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2016)
Coyle, C. M., Laws, K. R. · Human Psychopharmacology (2015)
Majic, T., Schmidt, T. T., Gallinat, J. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2015)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.