Trends in the Top-Cited Articles on Classic Psychedelics
This review paper (2021) investigates the trends in the top-cited papers on psychedelics and finds more RCT studies on psilocybin being done that get cited more often.
Authors
- Robin Carhart-Harris
- Roland Griffiths
Published
Abstract
This study was designed to identify trends in the top-cited classic psychedelic publications. The top 50 publications on classic psychedelics with the greatest total of number of citations and annual citation rate were identified and pooled. Unique articles (n = 77) were dichotomized by median year of publication (2010); the differential distribution of study characteristics between the “Recent Cohort” (n = 40) and “Older Cohort” (n = 37) were documented. The Recent Cohort had a greater annual citation rate (median 76.5, IQR 43.8 to 103.3) compared to the Older Cohort (median 8.8, IQR 4.2 to 17.2, p < .001). The Recent Cohort included a greater number of clinical studies (n = 27 [67.5%] vs. n = 10 [27.0%]) while the Older Cohort included more basic science and preclinical studies (n = 22 [59.5%] vs. n = 3 [7.5%], p < .001). Psilocybin was the predominant psychedelic studied in the Recent Cohort (n = 26 [40.6%] vs. n = 8 [17.4%]) while lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) was predominantly studied in the Older Cohort (n = 26 [56.5%] vs. n = 19 [29.7%], p = .028). The Recent Cohort included more studies examining affective disorders (n = 16 [25.8%] vs. n = 1 [2.7%]) and substance use disorders (n = 6 [9.7%] vs. n = 1 [2.7%]), while the Older Cohort included a greater number of pharmacological outcomes (n = 26 [70.3%] vs. n = 11 [17.7%], p < .001). This study identified and documented trends in the top-cited classic psychedelic publications. The field is continuing to form a foundational understanding of the pharmacological effects of psychedelics and is now advancing with the identification of therapeutic uses within clinical populations.
Research Summary of 'Trends in the Top-Cited Articles on Classic Psychedelics'
Introduction
Lawrence and colleagues situate this study within a period of renewed academic and public interest in classic psychedelics, driven by accumulating evidence that these substances may have therapeutic utility for a range of mental health conditions. Earlier research has established that classic psychedelics are serotonergic 5-HT2A receptor agonists (examples include psilocybin, LSD, DMT, and mescaline) and that investigations have ranged from basic pharmacology to clinical trials. The authors argue that bibliometric analysis—measuring citation counts and citation rates—can map the maturity and influence of subareas within this growing field and help identify which topics and study types are most prominent. Accordingly, the study aimed to perform a systematic bibliometric analysis to identify and document trends among the most highly cited publications on classic psychedelics. The investigators sought to characterise the top-cited articles by publication year, study design, psychedelic compound studied, geographic origin, and principal outcomes, with a particular focus on differences between more recent and older influential papers.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topic
- Authors
- APA Citation
Lawrence, D. W., Sharma, B., Griffiths, R. R., & Carhart-Harris, R. (2021). Trends in the Top-Cited Articles on Classic Psychedelics. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 53(4), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2021.1874573
References (15)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Anderson, T., Petranker, R., Rosenbaum, D. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, &. M., Day, C. M. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Muthukumaraswamy, S., Roseman, L. et al. · PNAS (2016)
Flanagan, T. W., Nichols, C. D. · International Review of Psychiatry (2018)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Hendricks, P. S., Thorne, C. B., Clark, B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Johnson, M. W., Hendricks, P. S., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2019)
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacology and Therapeutics (2004)
Show all 15 referencesShow fewer
Nichols, D. E. · Pharmacological Reviews (2016)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Barreto, D., Onias, H. et al. · Psychological Medicine (2018)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Rucker, J., Iliff, J., Nutt, D. J. · Neuropharmacology (2017)
Uthaug, M. V., Lancelotta, R., van Oorsouw, K. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Cited By (6)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Schlomberg, J. T. T., Meling, D., Grylka, R. et al. · Scientific Reports (2026)
Meling, D., Egger, K., Aicher, H. D. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Meling, D., Ehrenkra, R., Nayak, S. et al. · Psychoactives (2024)
Berit, S., Meling, D., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2024)
Lebrero-Tatay, J., Sebag, A., Ezquerra-Romano, I. I. · Journal of Drug Issues (2022)
Hadar, A., David, J., Shalit, N. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.