Unique Effects of Sedatives, Dissociatives, Psychedelics, Stimulants, and Cannabinoids on Episodic Memory: A Review and Reanalysis of Acute Drug Effects on Recollection, Familiarity, and Metamemory
This preprint (2022) assessed the effects of different psychoactive drugs on episodic memory and cognition by reanalysing episodic memory confidence data from 10 previously published datasets. Sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, and cannabinoids had unique patterns of effects on these mnemonic processes dependent on which phase of memory while all drugs at encoding, except stimulants impaired recollection, and sedatives, dissociatives, and cannabinoids at encoding impaired familiarity. Psychedelics at encoding tended to enhance familiarity and did not impact metamemory.
Authors
- Harriet de Wit
- Roland Griffiths
- Frederick Barrett
Published
Abstract
Despite distinct classes of psychoactive drugs producing putatively unique states of consciousness, there is surprising overlap in terms of their effects on episodic memory and cognition more generally. Episodic memory is supported by multiple subprocesses that have been mostly overlooked in psychopharmacology and could differentiate drug classes. Here, we reanalyzed episodic memory confidence data from 10 previously published datasets (28 drug conditions total) using signal detection models to estimate 2 conscious states involved in episodic memory and 1 consciously-controlled metacognitive process of memory: the retrieval of specific details from one's past (recollection), noetic recognition in the absence of retrieved details (familiarity), and accurate introspection of memory decisions (metamemory). We observed that sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, and cannabinoids had unique patterns of effects on these mnemonic processes dependent on which phase of memory (encoding, consolidation, or retrieval) was targeted. All drugs at encoding except stimulants impaired recollection, and sedatives, dissociatives, and cannabinoids at encoding impaired familiarity. The effects of sedatives on metamemory were mixed, whereas dissociatives and cannabinoids at encoding tended to enhance metamemory. Surprisingly, psychedelics at encoding tended to enhance familiarity and did not impact metamemory. Stimulants at encoding and retrieval enhanced metamemory, but at consolidation, they impaired metamemory. Together, these findings may have relevance to mechanisms underlying unique subjective phenomena under different drug classes, such as blackouts from sedatives or deja vu from psychedelics. This study provides a framework for interrogating drug effects within a domain of cognition beyond the global impairments on task performance typically reported in psychopharmacology.
Research Summary of 'Unique Effects of Sedatives, Dissociatives, Psychedelics, Stimulants, and Cannabinoids on Episodic Memory: A Review and Reanalysis of Acute Drug Effects on Recollection, Familiarity, and Metamemory'
Introduction
Doss and colleagues situate this work within a long-standing puzzle: pharmacologically distinct psychoactive drugs are often said to produce qualitatively different ‘‘altered states of consciousness,’’ yet many classes produce superficially similar impairments on standard cognitive measures such as episodic memory and metacognition. The authors argue that episodic memory is supported by dissociable subprocesses—recollection (retrieval of specific details), familiarity (a noetic feeling of prior occurrence without details), and metamemory (retrospective insight into one's memory accuracy)—and that these subprocesses have been underused in psychopharmacology. They propose that estimating these subprocesses from recognition-confidence data can reveal idiosyncratic drug effects that standard summary measures miss. Accordingly, the study reanalyses confidence and recognition data from 10 previously published, double-blind placebo-controlled datasets (28 drug conditions) spanning five drug classes (sedatives, dissociatives, psychedelics, stimulants, cannabinoids). Using dual process signal detection (DPSD) and meta-d' modelling, the investigators estimate recollection, familiarity, and metacognitive efficiency (meta-d'/d') to characterise how different drugs affect encoding, consolidation, and retrieval phases of episodic memory. The aim is both descriptive—documenting unique patterns across drug classes—and conceptual—providing a framework for linking drug-specific mnemonic signatures to subjective phenomena such as blackouts or déjà vu.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Authors
- APA Citation
Doss, M. K., Samaha, J., Barrett, F. S., Griffiths, R. R., de Wit, H., Gallo, D. A., & Koen, J. D. (2022). Unique Effects of Sedatives, Dissociatives, Psychedelics, Stimulants, and Cannabinoids on Episodic Memory: A Review and Reanalysis of Acute Drug Effects on Recollection, Familiarity, and Metamemory. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.20.492842
References (22)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Carbonaro, T. M., Hurwitz, E. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Wall, M. B., Erritzoe, D. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2013)
Carter, O., Burr, D. C., Pettigrew, J. D. et al. · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2006)
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)
Doss, M. K., Madden, M. B., Gaddis, A. et al. · Brain (2021)
Doss, M. K., May, D. G., Johnson, M. W. et al. · Scientific Reports (2020)
Geyer, M. A., Vollenweider, F. X. · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (2008)
Griffiths, R. R., Hurwitz, E. S., Davis, A. K. et al. · PLOS ONE (2019)
Kometer, M., Vollenweider, F. X. · Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs (2016)
Show all 22 referencesShow fewer
Kuypers, K. P. C., Ramaekers, J. G. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2005)
Lehmann, M., Neumann, C., Wasserthal, S. et al. · Neuroscience of Consciousness (2021)
Letheby, C., Gerrans, P. · Neuroscience of Consciousness (2017)
Mason, N. L., Kuypers, K. P. C., Reckweg, J. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Preller, K. H., Burt, J. B., Adkinson, B. et al. · eLife (2018)
Spitzer, M., Franke, B., Walter, H. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2001)
Spitzer, M., Thimm, M., Hermle, L. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (1996)
Valle, M., Maqueda, A. E., Rabella, M. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2016)
Vollenweider, F. X., Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen, M. F. I., Bäbler, A. et al. · NeuroReport (1998)
Wießner, I., Olivieri, R., Falchi, M. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Winkelman, M. J. · Frontiers in Neuroscience (2017)
Yaden, D. B., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Cited By (6)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Karp Barnir, E., Rubinstein, Z., Abend, R. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2025)
Doss, M. K., Kloft, L., Mason, N. L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Yaden, D. B., Goldy, S. P., Weiss, B. et al. · Nature Reviews Psychology (2024)
McGovern, H., Grimmer, H. J., Doss, M. K. et al. · Communications Psychology (2024)
Friedman, S. F., Ballentine, G. · Biorxiv (2022)
Doss, M. K., de Wit, H., Gallo, D. A. · Psyarxiv (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.