Acute Effects and Pharmacokinetics of LSD after Paroxetine or Placebo Pre-Administration in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Phase I Trial
In a randomized, double‑blind, cross‑over trial in 23 healthy volunteers, daily paroxetine (a CYP2D6 inhibitor) did not change LSD's pleasant subjective effects but significantly reduced adverse effects (bad drug effect, anxiety, nausea) and increased LSD Cmax and AUC by ~1.4–1.5-fold. The findings indicate CYP2D6 contributes to LSD metabolism and suggest co‑administration with SSRIs that inhibit CYP2D6 is well tolerated and likely does not require LSD dose adjustment, although recommendations for SSRIs that do not inhibit CYP2D6 remain uncertain.
Authors
- Matthias Liechti
- Anna Becker
- Isabella Straumann
Published
Abstract
Psychedelics, such as psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), are being investigated for the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders, for which concomitant treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is prevalent. The present study investigated the acute response to single doses of LSD (100 μg) after daily administration of paroxetine (10 mg for 7 days, followed by 20 mg for 35 days) or placebo (42 days) using a randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over design in 23 healthy participants. Paroxetine did not alter pleasant subjective effects of LSD but significantly reduced “bad drug effect,” “anxiety,” and “nausea.” No differences in autonomic effects or QTc interval after LSD administration were found between both conditions. The strong cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) inhibitor paroxetine led to higher maximal concentrations and total exposures of LSD (geometric mean ratios of 1.4 and 1.5, respectively) indicating relevant involvement of CYP2D6 in its metabolism. The extent of this inhibition was nominally highest in genetic CYP2D6 normal metabolizers and lowest in poor metabolizers. The present findings suggest that add‐on treatment with LSD to an SSRI is well‐tolerated. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions indicate that no dose adjustment of LSD seems necessary in the presence of an SSRI that inhibits CYP2D6. For SSRIs that do not relevantly inhibit CYP2D6, a dose increase of LSD might be appropriate, but due to lacking data and potential other pharmacokinetic interactions with these compounds, no definitive dose recommendation can be made.
Research Summary of 'Acute Effects and Pharmacokinetics of LSD after Paroxetine or Placebo Pre-Administration in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Phase I Trial'
Introduction
Classic psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin act principally via serotonin 5-HT2A receptor activation and are under investigation as treatments for depressive and anxiety disorders. Because many patients eligible for psychedelic-assisted therapies are already taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), concerns exist that SSRIs might modulate the acute effects of psychedelics via effects on 5-HT2A receptor number or function; case reports and survey data have suggested attenuation of psychedelic responses during SSRI treatment. Prior controlled work from this group showed reduced acute response to psilocybin after escitalopram, and clinical trials commonly discontinue SSRIs before psychedelic dosing despite withdrawal and relapse risks associated with discontinuation. Becker and colleagues designed the present trial to test whether six weeks of paroxetine (a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor) versus placebo would alter the acute subjective, adverse and autonomic responses to a single 100 μg dose of LSD in healthy volunteers. The study also aimed to characterise pharmacokinetic interactions and the role of CYP2D6 genotype in LSD metabolism, and to test the primary hypotheses that overall mind-altering effects (3D-OAV/5D-ASC total score) and peak "good drug effect" VAS ratings would be similar after paroxetine and placebo, while "bad drug effect" and "anxiety" would be reduced after paroxetine. The paroxetine manipulation additionally allowed investigation of whether increased LSD exposure via CYP2D6 inhibition would offset any SSRI-related pharmacodynamic attenuation.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Pro members can view the original manuscript directly in the browser.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Becker, A. M., Humbert‐Droz, M., Mueller, L., Jelušić, A., Tolev, A., Straumann, I., Avedisian, I., Erne, L., Thomann, J., Luethi, D., Grünblatt, E., Meyer zu Schwabedissen, H., & Liechti, M. E. (2025). Acute Effects and Pharmacokinetics of LSD after Paroxetine or Placebo Pre-Administration in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Phase I Trial. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 117(6), 1784-1792. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3618
References (26)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Burmester, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
Griffiths, R. R., Yaden, D. B., Nayak, S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Siva, J. B., Barba, T., Kettner, H. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Malcolm, B., Thomas, K. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Goodwin, G. M., Croal, M., Feifel, D. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2023)
Vizeli, P., Studerus, E., Holze, F. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2024)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)
Haijen, E. C. H. M., Kaelen, M., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Straumann, I., Holze, F., Becker, A. M. et al. · Neuroscience Applied (2024)
Holze, F., Caluori, T. V., Vizeli, P. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Show all 26 referencesShow fewer
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Erritzoe, D., Barba, T., Spriggs, M. J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Marwood, L., Croal, M., Mistry, S. et al. · Journal of Psychiatric Research (2024)
Ley, L., Holze, F., Arikci, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Holze, F., Ley, L., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Luethi, D., Hoener, M. C., Krähenbühl, S. et al. · Biochemical Pharmacology (2019)
Vizeli, P., Straumann, I., Holze, F. et al. · Scientific Reports (2021)
Holze, F., Duthaler, U., Vizeli, P. et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2019)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Nutt, D. J. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Cited By (2)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Seynaeve, M., Dunbar, F., Hindocha, C. et al. · CNS Drugs (2026)
Luquiens, A., Belahda, D., Graux, C. et al. · Addiction (2025)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.