This systematic review (2024) and meta-analysis (s=44) finds that medium/high doses of LSD yield higher ratings of visionary restructuralisation than psilocybin. It also reports that psychedelics strengthen between-network functional connectivity and diminish within-network connectivity, and that LSD induces more inositol phosphate formation at the 5-HT2A receptor than DMT or psilocin, while receptor selectivity differences remain negligible.
Serotonergic psychedelics induce altered states of consciousness and have shown potential for treating a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders, including depression and addiction. Yet their modes of action are not fully understood. Here, we provide a novel, synergistic understanding of psychedelics arising from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of three hierarchical levels of analysis: (1) subjective experience (phenomenology), (2) neuroimaging and (3) molecular pharmacology. Phenomenologically, medium and high doses of LSD yield significantly higher ratings of visionary restructuralisation than psilocybin on the 5-dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Scale. Our neuroimaging results reveal that, in general, psychedelics significantly strengthen between-network functional connectivity (FC) while significantly diminishing within-network FC. Pharmacologically, LSD induces significantly more inositol phosphate formation at the 5-HT2A receptor than DMT and psilocin, yet there are no significant between-drug differences in the selectivity of psychedelics for the 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, or D2 receptors, relative to the 5-HT1A receptor. Our meta-analyses link DMT, LSD, and psilocybin to specific neural fingerprints at each level of analysis. The results show a highly non-linear relationship between these fingerprints. Overall, our analysis highlighted the high heterogeneity and risk of bias in the literature. This suggests an urgent need for standardising experimental procedures and analysis techniques, as well as for more research on the emergence between different levels of psychedelic effects.
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Nutt, D. J., Erritzoe, D., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Cell (2020)
Tófoli, L. F., De Araujo, D. B. · International Review of Neurobiology (2016)
Goodwin, G. M., Malievskaia, E., Fonzo, G. A. et al. · American Journal of Psychiatry (2023)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2017)
Serotonergic psychedelics — including DMT, LSD, and psilocybin — alter consciousness profoundly and have attracted renewed clinical interest for neuropsychiatric disorders, yet their mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Prior research has typically examined each level of analysis — subjective phenomenology, functional neuroimaging, and molecular pharmacology — in isolation, precluding meaningful cross-level synthesis. This paper aimed to resolve that limitation by conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses at all three hierarchical levels simultaneously for the three classical tryptamine psychedelics, and integrating the findings using a common framework based on the seven canonical Yeo resting-state cortical networks.
Three separate systematic reviews and quantitative meta-analyses were conducted. The phenomenology review identified 44 studies assessing DMT, LSD, and psilocybin using either the five-dimensional (5D-ASC) or eleven-dimensional (11D-ASC) Altered States of Consciousness questionnaire. The neuroimaging review examined 17 studies reporting BOLD activation alongside additional studies reporting connectivity and entropy measures. The pharmacology review examined receptor binding selectivity relative to 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A, and downstream functional activity at the 5-HT2A receptor across three GPCR assay types. At each level, results were projected onto the Yeo seven-network cortical parcellation, providing a common spatial vocabulary for alignment analysis and enabling direct cross-level comparison across phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology.
The phenomenology meta-analysis demonstrated that LSD produces significantly higher ratings of visionary restructuralisation at medium and high doses than psilocybin or DMT on equivalent scales. Neuroimaging meta-analysis identified drug-specific spatial patterns: psilocybin-associated BOLD changes clustered preferentially in visual cortex, whilst LSD effects extended more broadly into frontal regions. Pharmacologically, all three compounds showed primary 5-HT2A agonism with no significant difference in receptor selectivity relative to 5-HT1A; however, LSD showed significantly greater functional activity at the inositol phosphate signalling pathway than psilocybin or DMT. Alignment of each level's results with the Yeo networks revealed partially convergent spatial profiles, with the default mode and visual networks featuring prominently across all three levels as a point of multi-level convergence, though the specific pattern of network involvement differed by compound and by level of analysis.
The meta-analytic synthesis supports a broadly consistent picture of psychedelic action centred on disruption of default mode and visual network function, whilst also revealing compound-specific differences that challenge the assumption that classical psychedelics are functionally interchangeable. The elevated visionary restructuralisation produced by LSD in phenomenological measures, its broader frontal involvement in BOLD studies, and its distinctive 5-HT2A functional activity profile collectively suggest pharmacological and experiential differences warranting further investigation. The authors identified a critical limitation of current analytic approaches: existing techniques are largely correlational and model-free, measuring associations between levels without elucidating the causal mechanisms that connect receptor pharmacology to network dynamics to subjective experience. Development of whole-brain computational models capable of capturing nonlinear cross-level relationships was identified as a key priority for the field.
Synergistic integration of systematic reviews and meta-analyses at three hierarchical levels — phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology — reveals both convergent and compound-specific patterns of psychedelic action in DMT, LSD, and psilocybin. The Yeo network framework enables direct cross-level comparison, identifying the default mode and visual networks as common foci across all three levels. Future progress will require computational modelling approaches capable of elucidating the causal mechanisms that bridge molecular pharmacology, neural dynamics, and subjective experience.
Psychedelics, derived from the Greek words "mind" and "manifesting," are hallucinogenic drugs that profoundly alter consciousness. The "classic" psychedelics are serotonergic substances that include lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), psilocybin (the primary psychoactive ingredient in magic mushrooms), and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT, the main psychoactive chemical in ayahuasca). Recently, the term "psychedelic" has been applied to other mindexpanding yet non-serotonergic drugs, including ketamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethampetamine (MDMA, also known as ecstasy). For the sake of this paper, we will only consider the classic psychedelics. Psychedelics have been utilised by early cultures for millennia within diverse sociocultural contexts, as well as spiritual and healing rituals. Recently, researchers have come to recognise that psychedelics may be effective tools in the treatment of psychiatric disorders such as depressionand addiction. It is worth noting that, in the contemporary era of psychedelic research, psychedelics are typically only administered as adjuncts to therapy (hence the phrase "psychedelic-assisted therapy"), which may confound the therapeutic effects of the drugs themselves. The effects of psychedelic substances have been examined at several levels. Pharmacological research has measured their interaction with various receptors in the brain (e.g.), while other research domains have explored the subjective experience, or phenomenology, of a psychedelic 'trip'. Neuroimaging research has examined changes in brain activity and functional connectivity under the influence of psychedelics, yet there are still relatively few studies and a plethora of different analysis techniques. Here, we report the findings of three systematic meta-analyses focused on synthesising the evidence about three classical psychedelics: DMT, LSD, and psilocybin. The main aim is to analyse the literature across three levels of description: (1) phenomenology-to discuss key differences in the states of consciousness elicited by psychedelics; (2) functional neuroimaging-to compare the changes in brain activity, functional connectivity, and entropy that are induced by psychedelics; and (3) pharmacology-to discuss the binding affinities and functional activity of psychedelics with respect to various serotonergic and dopaminergic receptors.
Psychedelics produce altered states of consciousness that are characterised by visual hallucinations; ego death, or a breakdown in one's sense of self; and spiritual or "mystical" experiences. The Altered States of Consciousness (ASC) scale is one popular questionnaire that captures several of these subjective effects. It measures these states along five different dimensions: oceanic boundlessness (e.g. a sense of interconnectedness), anxious ego dissolution, visionary restructuralisation (e.g. visual hallucinations), auditory alterations, and reduction of vigilance. Subsequent factor analyses led to the extraction of 11 lower-order dimensions from the 5D-ASC, resulting in the development of the 11D-ASC: experience of unity, spiritual experience, blissful state, insightfulness, disembodiment, impaired control and cognition, anxiety, elementary imagery, complex imagery, audio-visual synaesthesia, and changed meaning of percepts. Because the ASC is the most common subjective questionnaire in the literature on the neuroimaging of psychedelics, we performed a meta-analysis on both the 5D-and 11D-ASC scores of DMT, LSD, and psilocybin. However, the ASC is just one of many scales for rating the subjective effects of psychedelics. The multiplicity of scales makes it difficult to comprehensively evaluate the literature on the phenomenology of psychedelics. To date, only two studies have used a single set of scales to compare the subjective effects of LSD and psilocybin in the same group of participants. More recent research has attempted to draw direct comparisons by qualitatively examining larger datasets, such as the Erowid database of trip reports. The key findings from these comparative studies are discussed in Section S3.
The first functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of psychedelics, published in 2012, was an exploratory analysis of psilocybin-induced changes in cerebral blood flow and BOLD activity in healthy human participants. Since then, dozens of fMRI studies have been performed on human participants under the influence of ayahausca, LSD, psilocybin and DMT, including several studies on depressed patients. The fMRI studies assess three different metrics of brain activity: BOLD activation, connectivity, and entropy. Studies on BOLD activation analyse changes in the trajectory of BOLD timeseries with a rapidly-acting psychedelic, such as intravenouslyadministered psilocybin. Connectivity studies can examine undirected, instantaneous correlations between different regions (a type of functional connectivity) or model the experimental factors that modulate directed connections between regions, using dynamic causal modelling (a tool for measuring effective connectivity). The entropy of spontaneous brain activity is best assessed with MEG and EEG, but efforts to compute entropy on the spontaneous BOLD signal, as well as the entropy rate (Lempel-Ziv complexity) and indices of criticality, have also been attempted (see Section S1.2 for a full list of citations). While studies on BOLD activation and functional connectivity are common for most subject areas within cognitive neuroscience, entropy is a rather unique feature of the psychedelic neuroimaging literature. The studies on entropy were motivated by Robin Carhart-Harris' influential Entropic Brain Hypothesis (EBH), which states that psychedelics alter consciousness by elevating the entropy of spontaneous brain activity across time. We performed a quantitative meta-analysis of the pairwise functional connectivity data using a novel algorithm. We initially attempted to conduct a quantitative meta-analysis of the BOLD activation data with the GingerALE method, which examines common clusters of BOLD activity across studies. However, we found that the data was too heterogeneous for the results to be valid. From the outset, we decided to provide a qualitative discussion of the studies on entropy, due to the wide range of methods in that section of the literature. We chose to perform a meta-analysis exclusively on the fMRI data and not on any of the other modalities used to measure brain activity, such as PET, SPECT, MEG, and EEG. There were too few primary PET (4), SPECT (4), or MEG (2) datasets to merit a metaanalysis; by comparison, 30 fMRI studies have collected original data. While there are many more primary EEG datasetsfrom the post-1960s era (and even more from the 1950s to 1960s era) than PET, SPECT, or MEG, most of the EEG studies do not spatially localise the brain activity recorded at EEG electrodes. Without the raw data, which may be difficult to access when some of the studies are nearly 20 years old, we cannot source-localise the EEG activity ourselves. On the other hand, most fMRI studies report the spatial coordinates of the brain regions that become more or less active or connected on psychedelics. In general, EEG has higher temporal resolution than fMRI, so a future meta-analysis that focuses on the temporal, rather than spatial, characteristics of brain activity on psychedelics could consider the EEG rather than fMRI data.
All classic psychedelics activate serotonin receptors. In particular, their interaction with the serotonin-2A (5-HT 2A ) receptor is their primary mechanism of action. Multiple studies have demonstrated that blocking the 5-HT 2A receptor with antagonists such as ketanserin eliminates their subjective effects. 5-HT 2A expression is profuse in human cortex, with one study finding highest expression in the posterior cingulate cortex and V1. In both humans and monkeys, 86-100% of glutamatergic cells in layers II-V of cortex express mRNA encoding 5-HT 2A receptors. 5-HT 2A has also been identified in many subcortical regions, though human PET imaging implies lower expression than in the cortex. Although the consciousness-altering effects of psychedelics do primarily arise from their action at the 5-HT 2A receptor, different psychedelics display different binding profiles. For instance, unlike DMT and psilocybin, LSD has moderate affinity for dopamine receptors. Differences in binding affinities could partially account for the distinctive phenomenology of each psychedelic. There is also some evidence that the 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 2C receptors may mediate the effects of psychedelics. However, binding affinity paints an incomplete picture of the pharmacology of psychedelics. Another key aspect is their functional activity at receptors. Serotonin and dopamine receptors tend to be G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which perform essential roles in neurophysiological processes like smell, taste, light perception, and more. GPCRs regulate these processes through G protein signalling pathways, which are initiated when agonists bind to GPCRs and activate G proteins. Different families of G proteins are selective for particular signalling pathways. In a phenomenon known as biased agonism, agonists can induce certain conformations in GPCRs, which then selectively activate certain pathways and not others. 5-HT 2 receptors couple preferentially to a family of G proteins known as Gα q/11 , which activates the enzyme phospholipase C (PLC). This enzyme then catalyses the synthesis of the secondary messenger inositol triphosphate (IP 3 , a species of inositol phosphate [IP]), which subsequently leads to the release or "mobilisation" of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum. Psychedelics are also known to recruit β-arrestin proteins. These proteins block the interaction between G proteins and the GPCR and remove the GPCR from the cell membrane, while also coupling GPCRs to signalling proteins without activating G proteins; thus, β-arrestin promotes alternative signalling pathways. Functional GPCR assays on psychedelics have tended to focus on the three aspects of GPCR signalling described above: (1) IP formation, (2) calcium mobilisation, and (3) β-arrestin (specifically β-arrestin2) recruitment. We performed a meta-analysis of the selective affinity of DMT, LSD, and psilocin for the 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2C , and D 2 receptors, relative to the 5-HT 1A receptor. Additionally, we conducted a metaanalysis of their functional activity at the 5-HT 2A receptor, as measured by the three aforementioned assays.
We present the results of our meta-analysis of the phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology of three classical psychedelics: DMT, LSD, and psilocybin. At each level, we measured the alignment between the corresponding results and the Yeo networks, which facilitated comparisons between the three hierarchical levels.
We performed a meta-analysis on the 5D-and 11D-ASC scores of DMT, LSD, and psilocybin. Our literature search identified n = 44 phenomenology studies that met the inclusion criteria, including 5 studies on DMT (5D-ASC: n = 3; 11D-ASC: n = 3), 14 studies on LSD (5D-ASC: n = 9; 11D-ASC: n = 12), and 25 studies on psilocybin (5D-ASC: n = 12; 11D-ASC: n = 17). The eleven dimensions of the 11D-ASC are subscales of three dimensions in the 5D-ASC: oceanic boundlessness (OB), anxious ego dissolution (AED), and visionary restructuralisation (VR). Nevertheless, the 11D-ASC questionnaire contains fewer items than the 5D-ASC questionnaire, so 5D-ASC data cannot be directly compared to 11D-ASC data. Hence, we ran separate meta-analyses for the 5D-ASC and 11D-ASC data. In order to account for the measurement of multiple subjective dimensions, sometimes with more than one dose or drug, in individual studies, we performed a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis. DMT was administered intravenously (IV) in the phenomenological studies, whereas LSD and psilocybin were administered orally (we excluded phenomenological studies that used IV LSD and psilocybin). IV administration yields different pharmacokinetics, which are known to influence the subjective experience of the drug. Therefore, while we conducted meta-analyses of all three drugs, we only examined significant between-drug differences for ASC ratings of LSD and psilocybin. Additionally, we only compared similar doses of LSD and psilocybin. We assumed 20 mg psilocybin is equivalent to 0.01 mg LSD, and we defined low, medium, and high doses based on the literature. Pooled 5D-ASC scores for DMT, LSD, and psilocybin are shown in Fig.(numerical data are given in Table). Between-drug differences for LSD and psilocybin are displayed in the left column of Fig., and within-drug differences are displayed in the right column. At medium doses (LSD: 0.075-0.109 mg, psilocybin: 15-21 mg), 5D-ASC scores were significantly greater for LSD than psilocybin in the OB dimension (p = 0.0283), which corresponds to feelings of interconnectedness, and the VR dimension (p = 0.0468), which measures the quality and intensity of visual hallucinations. We also observed a significant difference between LSD and psilocybin in the VR dimension (p = 0.0417) at high doses (LSD: ≥ 0.010 mg, psilocybin: ≥22 mg). There were no significant differences at low doses (LSD: 0.050-0.074 mg, psilocybin: 8-14 mg). Within-drug differences between the five subjective dimensions were quite similar. A clear separation can be seen between two groups of subjective categories: (1) OB, VR, RV, and (2) AA and AED. At medium doses, VR and OB scores were significantly higher than both AED and AA scores for both LSD and psilocybin. For DMT, there were no significant differences between dimensions at high doses (≥16 mg bolus injection, followed by continuous infusion of 1 mg/min), but for low doses (10-15 mg bolus + 0.6-0.99 mg/min continuous infusion), AED ranked significantly lower than both OB and VR. (Note that only one study measured AA and RV scores for DMT, so we did not perform a meta-analysis on these dimensions for DMT.) The results of the 11D-ASC meta-analysis were not very consistent with those of the 5D-ASC meta-analysis (Fig.; Table). Note that we could not include DMT in the 11D-ASC metaanalysis because two of the three studies on DMT did not report standard errors, which are necessary for pooling the subjective data. At high doses, there were no significant differences between LSD and psilocybin in any of the dimensions, and standard errors were very large for psilocybin in some dimensions, particularly in some OB and VR subscales. At medium doses, where standard errors tended to be lower, we observed that two of the OB subscales (experience of unity and insightfulness), one of the AED subscales (impaired control and cognition), and three of the VR subscales (complex imagery, audio-visual synaesthesia, and changed meaning of percepts) ranked significantly higher for LSD than psilocybin. In line with the 5D-ASC results, we did not find any significant differences between LSD and psilocybin at low doses. However, unlike the 5D-ASC analysis, the 11D-ASC analysis showed that psilocybin rated higher than LSD in most of the dimensions; that being said, standard errors were very high for both LSD and psilocybin, so our estimates are not reliable. For medium doses, within-drug comparisons for the 11D-ASC analysis generally aligned with those of the 5D-ASC analysis. We did not find any significant relationship between the pooled 5D-ASC scores and three methodological covariates that were defined a priori: prior psychedelic use, the time that the questionnaire was administered relative to the drug, and the presence or absence of a task in the experiment. Additionally, there was significant residual heterogeneity in the pooled 5D-and 11D-ASC scores (p < 0.0001 in both cases). Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain reliable estimates of heterogeneity specifically attributable to within-study and between-study differences. For three of the 5D-ASC scales, we found evidence of significant publication bias with Egger's regression test, which determines whether small studies report disproportionately high effect sizes (OB: p = 0.0187, AED: p < 0.0001, VR: p = 0.6279, AA: p < 0.0001, RV: p = 0.6532). The results of our risk-of-bias assessments for individual studies are shown in Table. Due to the moderate-toserious risk of bias, significant residual heterogeneity, high probability of publication bias, and indirectness (some studies measured subjective effects while participants were performing a specific task, as opposed to during resting-state), our certainty in the body of phenomenological evidence is low. In order to directly compare the phenomenology of psychedelics to their neuroimaging and pharmacological profiles (Section 2.2 and Section 2.3), we sought to determine the "phenomenology profiles" of DMT, LSD, and psilocybin based on the neural correlates of their subjective effects. We performed a separate literature search of studies that measured correlations between ASC ratings and fMRI activity. We determined the Yeo network that contained each brain region that exhibited a significant correlation. The phenomenology profiles were defined by a weighted combination of the mean correlations between each ASC scale and each Yeo network, in which the weights were the pooled ASC ratings of high doses of each psychedelic for the corresponding scale. Because there were few significant differences in the pooled ASC scores, the phenomenology profiles of the psychedelics look very similar (Fig.). However, these profiles may not reflect the true neural correlates of the subjective effects of psychedelics. Many studies performed correlations between ASC ratings and brain regions that were active only in specific tasks, but the tasks Fig.Meta-analysis of the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC) data reveals few significant differences between psychedelics, but many more significant differences within psychedelics. The 5D-ASC is one of the most common scales for assessing the subjective effects of psychedelics. It measures altered states of consciousness along five different dimensions: oceanic boundlessness (OB; a feeling of interconnectedness), anxious ego dissolution (AED), visionary restructuralisation (VR; the quality and intensity of visual hallucinations), auditory alterations (AA), and reduction of vigilance (RV). Our literature search identified 23 studies that reported 5D-ASC data. We performed a multilevel random-effects meta-analysis in order to account for the lack of statistical independence between measurements of different dimensions within the same group of participants. Within-study and between-study heterogeneity were estimated with the restricted maximum likelihood procedure. Using a Correlated and Hierarchical Effects model to account for within-study correlations in sampling error, we analysed the effect of dose and drug (DMT, LSD, or psilocybin) on pooled 5D-ASC scores. DMT was administered intravenously in phenomenological studies, whereas LSD and psilocybin were administered orally. Thus, DMT has different pharmacokinetics from LSD and psilocybin, which impacts the subjective experience, so we only compared significant between-drug differences for LSD and psilocybin. We only compared the two drugs for similar doses, assuming that 0.1 mg LSD = 20 mg psilocybin (Ley et al.). (a-c, left column) Between-drug comparisons of pooled 5D-ASC scores for LSD and psilocybin. LSD almost always ranked higher than psilocybin, but differences only reached significance in the VR dimension for high and medium doses and in the OB dimension for medium dose. (a-c, right column) Within-drug comparisons for LSD and psilocybin. VR and OB received significantly higher scores than AED and AA, for both LSD and psilocybin. (d, e) Within-drug comparisons for DMT. At low doses, OB and VR ranked significantly higher than AED. Only one study measured ASC scores for the AA and RV dimensions on DMT, so we did not perform a meta-analysis on these dimensions for DMT. Numerical data for the above figure are given in Table. We also conducted a meta-analysis of the 11-dimensional ASC scale, which is also widely used in the literature; the results are displayed in Fig.and Table. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. varied strongly in the literature. There need to be more studies that link whole-brain fMRI activity to ASC ratings before we can estimate the phenomenology profiles with confidence. Finally, we also aimed to relate the phenomenology of different psychedelics by qualitatively synthesising the findings of papers that directly compared the subjective experiences of DMT/ ayahuasca, LSD, and psilocybin. Section S3 contains a comprehensive summary of their major aims, analysis approaches and findings.
As stated above, the fMRI studies on psychedelics measure three different characteristics of brain activity: BOLD activation, entropy, and connectivity. We identified n = 17 studies on BOLD activation, including n = 3 studies on ayahuasca or DMT, n = 7 studies on LSD, and n = 4 studies on psilocybin. Initially, we used the GingerALE method to determine common clusters of BOLD activation across studies. We observed that psilocybin was associated with a cluster of activity in visual cortices, whereas LSD tended to affect more frontal areas. However, three of the four studies on psilocybin displayed visual stimuli to participants. Therefore, our results were likely confounded by the tasks that were used in the literature. We chose not to report the results of our GingerALE analysis because they are likely misleading. The n = 12 fMRI studies on entropy and criticality in the psychedelic literature are very heterogeneous, employing a wide variety of measures on dissimilar variables of interest. A quantitative meta-analysis was extremely challenging, so we opted instead to perform a qualitative review of this literature, which is reported in Section S4. The studies on connectivity were the only segment of the fMRI literature for which we determined that we could conduct a valid meta-analysis. These studies tended to use the same resting-state experimental procedure, and many of them employed similar methods for measuring connectivity. However, one major obstacle was the variety of parcellations in the literature. Since each study defined regions of interest (ROIs) in a different way, it was not possible to simply perform a weighted average of connectivity values across studies. (This weighted average method is essentially the core technique of the phenomenology and pharmacology meta-analyses.) An alternative approach is to "re-reference" the data to a coarse-grained parcellation: the Yeo networks, of which there are only seven in the brain. That is, for every pair of functionally connected ROIs in the literature, we determine the corresponding Yeo networks that contain them. If the connection is positive (it increases under psychedelics), then the aggregate FC between those Yeo networks is incremented; otherwise, it is decremented. Our method for weighting each connection in the literature is described in Section S2.2.2. We determined significance by repeatedly applying our method to an independent restingstate fMRI dataset of sober, healthy individuals, which resulted in a null distribution (Fig.). This method is capable of synthesising studies on pairwise FC, such as seed-to-seed, seed-to-voxel, and within-and betweennetwork FC analyses using independent components analysis (see Tablefor a full description of the inputs). The algorithm cannot accommodate global, structural metrics of connectivity such as global brain connectivity (GBC) or graph-theoretic modularity. Additionally, the algorithm does not capture any information about the direction of connectivity between regions; therefore, we did not incorporate studies of effective connectivity or directed FC. (However, the vast majority of FC studies measured undirected FC.) Many FC studies are secondary analyses of the same primary dataset. For instance, the primary FC data from Carhart-Harris et al.was re-analysed at least seven times with different methods in subsequent studies. To mitigate bias, we only inputted the most informative analysis of each unique dataset into the meta-analysis algorithm, such that each dataset was only represented once in the meta-analysis. Our method for selecting the most informative analysis is described in Section S2.2.2. Based on these criteria and others, we ultimately identified n = 12 studies on connectivity that were eligible for our metaanalysis, including n = 3 studies on ayahuasca or DMT, n = 3 studies on LSD, and n = 6 studies on psilocybin. (There are 22 other studies on connectivity that we qualitatively review in Section S5.) Our estimates of aggregate FC between Yeo networks, Fig.Phenomenology profiles of the psychedelics demonstrate broad similarity between the neural correlates of their subjective effects. We identified 14 studies that measured correlations between ASC ratings and fMRI activity or pairwise connectivity, including three studies on ketamine. We determined the Yeo network that contained each brain region that exhibited a significant correlation, and then we averaged across the correlations associated with each Yeo network, resulting in the mean correlation between each Yeo network and each ASC scale. The phenomenology profiles were defined by a weighted combination of the mean correlations for each ASC scale, in which the weights were the pooled ASC ratings of high doses of each psychedelic for the corresponding scale. Because the pooled ASC ratings are similar across psychedelics, the phenomenology profiles are very alike one another as well. However, the lack of data on the neural correlates of the ASC ratings limits our confidence in the validity of these profiles. across all psychedelics, are shown in Fig.. Psychedelics significantly strengthened between-network connectivity across most pairs of networks. Within-network connectivity significantly decreased in the visual network, ventral attention network (VAN), and default mode network (DMN), yet significantly increased in the dorsal attention network (DAN) and frontoparietal network (FPN). Connectivity between the limbic network and other networks was generally deemed insignificant, likely due to the small size of this network in the Yeo parcellation and therefore low number of seed regions in the literature that predominantly overlap with it. In addition to aggregating FC across all psychedelics, we performed our analysis separately on each individual psychedelic (Fig.). All three of the psychedelics significantly reduced the within-network FC of the visual network while generally elevating between-network FC. Intriguingly, LSD significantly increased FC within the DMN, but this is largely due to a high number of significant connections that were identified in a single studybetween regions that are typically not considered to be core elements of the DMN yet are nevertheless classified by the Yeo parcellation as regions within the DMN, such as the frontal pole and inferior frontal gyrus. LSD significantly elevated FC between the limbic network and visual network, as well as between the limbic network and FPN, whereas FC between the limbic network and all other networks was insignificant for ayahuasca/DMT and psilocybin. Ayahuasca/DMT was the only psychedelic to significantly reduce FC between the visual network and SMN, as well as between the visual network and DAN. Thus, only ayahuasca/DMT was associated with negative total FC of the visual network (sum of FC between the visual network and all other networks), while total FC of the VAN was negative for only psilocybin, though this result was driven by the findings of just a single study(Fig.). Figures S6-S8 display the results of our meta-analysis on the FC of subcortical regions. Because several studies did not measure subcortical FC, most of the subcortical-to-subcortical and subcortical-to-cortical edges in the aggregate FC matrix are insignificant. Nevertheless, the significant edges indicate that psychedelics elevate connectivity from two regions in the subcortexthe anterior thalamus and cerebellumto cortex, as well as from the anterior thalamus to some other subcortical structures. Compared to the other psychedelics, LSD vastly elevated the FC between the anterior thalamus and both the cortex and subcortex. Fig.Meta-analysis of the functional connectivity (FC) data indicates that psychedelics potently increase between-network FC. To perform a meta-analysis on the FC data, we determined the Yeo networks that contained each pair of functionally connected regions of interest (ROIs) in the literature and then performed a weighted sum of the number of significant connections between Yeo networks. We included n = 12 studies in this meta-analysis, after excluding studies that did not measure pairwise FC and secondary analyses of identical datasets. a The aggregate FC matrix shows the overall connectivity between pairs of Yeo networks. b Several connections were deemed to be insignificant relative to a null distribution that was formed from an independent resting-state fMRI dataset collected by the Human Connectome Project. c A rendering of (b) on the surface of the brain, created with the BrainNet Viewer [141]. Finally, there was no significant association between our results and any of the methodological covariates in the literature that we identified a priori: the width of the Gaussian kernel used to smooth the data, the use of FSL or SPM, the technique used to regress out white matter, the use of scrubbing to correct head motion, and route (oral or intravenous) and relative timing of drug administration. The results of our risk-of-bias assessment for individual studies are shown in Table. Because of the moderateto-serious risk of bias, our certainty in the body of FC literature is low.
We performed two separate meta-analyses on the pharmacology of psychedelics. The first assessed the selective affinity of DMT, LSD, and psilocin for the 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2C , and D 2 receptors, relative to 5-HT 1A , as well as selective affinity for the 5-HT 1A , 5-HT 2C , and D 2 receptors, relative to 5-HT 2A . The second examined the relative functional activity of the psychedelics at the 5-HT 2A receptor, as captured in three different assays of GPCR signalling. Affinity. We first present our meta-analysis of the selective affinity data. Selectivity is defined as the ratio between the K i of each psychedelic for a receptor of interest, relative to a reference receptor. K i refers to the inhibition constant, which reflects the concentration of a drug that is needed to inhibit the binding of another ligand, for instance a radioactively-labelled ligand (radioligand), to the receptor of interest; it is inversely related to binding affinity. We initially chose 5-HT 1A to be the reference receptor. We decided to analyse selectivity rather than absolute K i because the latter is biased by the potency of the drug. Since LSD is much more potent than DMT and psilocin, the metaanalysis would have simply revealed that LSD has higher affinity for all receptors if we were to examine the absolute K i instead. Our literature search identified n = 14 studies on selectivity, including n = 6 studies on DMT, n = 9 studies on LSD, and n = 5 studies on psilocin. We performed a random-effects metaanalysis, the results of which are displayed in Fig.(numerical data are given in Table). We found no significant between-drug differences in selectivity for any of the receptors -5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2C , and D 2relative to the 5-HT 1A receptor. Standard errors were very large for all of the pooled selectivity values, and heterogeneity was very high for the 5-HT 2A selectivity data (I 2 = 93.69%) and for the 5-HT 2C selectivity data (I 2 = 99.14%). Nevertheless, it is clear that all drugs display less selectivity for D 2 than they do for 5-HT 2C and 5-HT 2A . Each individual drug, especially LSD and psilocin, is more selective for 5-HT 2A than 5-HT 1A . DMT and psilocin are about as equally selective for 5-HT 2C as they are for 5-HT 1A , but LSD is much less selective for 5-HT 2C than for 5-HT 1A . We constructed another random-effects model in which the radioligand for the receptor of interest was included as a covariate; we refer to this as the "full" model and the previous one, in which the influence of the radioligand was not modelled, as the "reduced" model. For 5-HT 2A , the use of the radioligands According to the corrected Akaike's information criterion, the full model performed significantly better than the reduced model for 5-HT 2A selectivity (p < 0.0001), whereas the reverse was true for 5-HT 2C selectivity (p = 0.0024). We assessed publication bias due to small study effects and found significant evidence for bias in the 5-HT 2A (p = 0.0001) and 5-HT 2C (p = 0.0004) affinity data. (There were not enough studies on D 2 affinity to measure bias.) In Section S6.3, we qualitatively describe some major confounders in the affinity literature. Due to the large imprecision of the results and high probability of publication bias, our certainty in the body of evidence about selectivity is low. However, when selectivity was measured relative to the 5-HT 2A receptor, there were significant between-drug differences (Fig.; numerical results shown in Table). (Note that there were three additional studies, one for DMT and two for LSD.) In particular, DMT was significantly more selective for the 5-HT 2C receptor than both LSD (p = 0.001) and psilocin (p = 0.0035). In addition, selectivity for the D 2 receptor was significantly higher for DMT than for psilocin (p = 0.001). Heterogeneity was once again high for the 5-HT 2C selectivity data (I 2 = 98.56%) and for the 5-HT 1A selectivity (I 2 = 99.91%). Surprisingly, there was no evidence for small-study bias in either the 5-HT 1A (p = 0.1683) or the 5-HT 2C case (p = 0.3604). To relate the selective affinities to the neuroimaging and phenomenology of psychedelics, we first determined the expression of the 5-HT 2A and D 2 receptors in the Yeo networks, based on Fig.Functional connectivity (FC) profiles show unique FC patterns for each psychedelic. Out of the n = 12 studies that we examined in our quantitative FC meta-analysis, n = 3 were studies on ayahuasca/DMT (ayahuasca: n = 2; DMT: n = 1), n = 3 on LSD, and n = 6 on psilocybin. Each FC profile contains the total FC of each network, which was obtained by taking the sum of the rows of the corresponding aggregate FC matrices (Fig.). (The units of the profiles are arbitrary.) The psychedelics display distinct FC profiles; for instance, LSD strongly elevates the total FC of the limbic network, whereas FC between the limbic network and all other networks was insignificant for ayahuasca/DMT and psilocybin (hence there is no point on the limbic network for the respective spider plots). an atlas of PET maps(unfortunately, this did not include maps of the 5-HT 2C receptor). Then, we defined the "pharmacology profile" as the weighted sum of the expression patterns, in which the weights were the selectivity of each psychedelic for the corresponding receptor, relative to the 5-HT 1A receptor (Fig.). Because selectivity for the 5-HT 2A receptor is around two orders of magnitude higher than for the D 2 receptor, the pharmacology profile predominantly reflects selectivity for 5-HT 2A . Since psilocin's selectivity for 5-HT 2A is greater than that of LSD and DMT, psilocin has the "largest" pharmacology profile. 5-HT 2A is expressed most in the DMN; thus, selectivity for 5-HT 2A may affect brain activity the most in the DMN. Subcortical pharmacology profiles are shown in Fig.and indicate that 5-HT 2A receptor expression is highest in the hippocampus. Functional activity. Binding affinity is only one facet of the pharmacology of psychedelics. Another key aspect is their functional activity: the responses that they elicit in receptors after binding to them. While there are many ways to measure functional activity, we focused on GPCR signalling through three different pathways: (1) IP formation, (2) calcium mobilisation, and (3) β-arrestin2 recruitment. We limited our analysis to functional activity at specifically the 5-HT 2A receptor, as there was much more data about this receptor in humans. The variable of interest in our analysis was Δlog(E max /EC 50 ). We found n = 18 relevant studies on functional activity, including n = 6 studies on DMT, n = 13 studies on LSD, and n = 6 studies on psilocin. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis. For the IP formation and calcium mobilisation assays, the reference ligand was serotonin; for the β-arrestin2 recruitment assays, the reference ligand was chosen to be mescaline, as this was the only reference ligand used in experiments on all three psychedelics. The pooled relative activity values indicate that LSD induces significantly more IP formation than DMT (p < 0.0001) and psilocin (p = 0.0002) (Fig.; numerical data given in Table). Additionally, DMT elicits significantly more IP formation than psilocin (p = 0.0203). There were no significant between-drug differences for the other two pathways. Heterogeneity was very high for all three pathways (IP formation: I 2 = 95.35%, calcium mobilisation: I 2 = 92.66%, β-arrestin2 recruitment: I 2 = 91.05%). There was no significant publication bias due to small study effects for the literature on IP formation (p = 0.3460). (There were too few studies on the other pathways to assess publication bias.) Because of the large standard errors of the pooled estimates and high unexplained heterogeneity, our certainty in the body of evidence about functional activity is low, despite the lack of evidence for publication bias.
Here we examine the effects of psychedelics at three levels: (1) subjective experience (phenomenology), (2) functional connectivity (neuroimaging), and (3) the interaction of psychedelics with serotonin and dopamine receptors (pharmacology). At each level, we performed a quantitative meta-analysis and computed the alignment between the results and the seven Yeo networks. The latter network analysis enabled us to directly compare the effects of three psychedelicsayahuasca/DMT, LSD, and psilocybinwithin and between levels.
For the phenomenology literature, we conducted a meta-analysis of both the 5-dimensional and 11-dimensional versions of the Fig.Pharmacology meta-analysis reveals that there are no significant differences in selectivity between psychedelics relative to 5-HT 1A and that LSD induces significantly higher relative activity at the inositol phosphate (IP) formation pathway. For both the selectivity and relative activity data, we created random-effects models that modelled between-study variance. a Selectivity is the ratio between the binding affinity (measured as K i ) for a receptor of interest and the affinity for a reference receptor. We measured selectivity for three different receptors -5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2C , and D 2relative to 5-HT 1A . Our literature search identified n = 14 studies on selectivity, including n = 6 studies on DMT, n = 9 studies on LSD, and n = 5 studies on psilocin. We did not find any significant between-drug differences in selectivity for any of the three receptors. b Relative activity is a measure of the cellular signalling that is elicited when a drug binds to a receptor. It is calculated here as Δlog(E max /EC 50 ), where E max is the maximal effect of the drug relative to a reference ligand and EC 50 is the concentration needed to elicit 50% of the maximal effect. We found n = 18 studies on functional activity, including n = 6 studies on DMT, n = 13 studies on LSD, and n = 6 studies on psilocin. We measured relative activity at three different signalling pathways: calcium mobilisation, IP formation, and β-arrestin2 recruitment. IP formation was the only pathway that exhibited any significant between-drug differences; LSD elicited significantly higher activity than both DMT and psilocin. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Fig.Pharmacology profiles primarily reveal the distribution of 5-HT 2A receptors in the Yeo networks, as well as the (insignificantly) higher selectivity of psilocin for the 5-HT 2A receptor compared to DMT and LSD. Based on an available PET atlas of the 5-HT 2A and D 2 receptors, we created the pharmacology profile of each psychedelic. The profiles show the expression of those two receptors in the Yeo networks, weighted by the selectivity of the corresponding psychedelics for those receptors. Because the selectivity for 5-HT 2A is two orders of magnitude higher than the selectivity for D 2 , the profiles are dominated by 5-HT 2A receptor expression. Since psilocin has the most selectivity for 5-HT 2A (relative to 5-HT 1A ), followed by LSD then DMT, psilocin's pharmacology profile is the "largest.". Altered States of Consciousness (ASC) scale, a common questionnaire for measuring changes in subjective experience on psychedelics. At both medium and high doses, LSD ranked significantly higher than psilocybin in "visionary restructuralisation," a dimension capturing the quality and intensity of visual hallucinations. Additionally, at medium doses, LSD was associated with significantly higher scores in the "oceanic boundlessness" dimension, which captures feelings of interconnectedness. The whole-brain neuroimaging data consisted of three subsets of data: BOLD activation, entropy, and FC. We did not report a meta-analysis of the BOLD activation or entropy literature due to the heterogeneity of experimental procedures and analysis methods, respectively; however, we did conduct a qualitative review of the entropy literature (Section S4). To perform a metaanalysis on the FC data, we essentially re-parcellated the published data into the Yeo networks and then calculated a weighted sum of the connections between Yeo networks. LSD strongly elevated FC between the visual network and the other networks, whereas ayahuasca/DMT increased FC most between transmodal networks (specifically, the FPN and DMN) and other networks. For pharmacology, we conducted two meta-analyses: one of selectivity and another of relative functional activity. There were no significant differences between psychedelics in selectivity for the 5-HT 2A , 5-HT , or D 2 receptors relative to the 5-HT 1A receptor. Compared to both DMT and psilocin, LSD elicited significantly more relative activity in IP formation assays. We did not observe any significant between-drug differences for the calcium mobilisation and β-arrestin2 recruitment assays. Directly comparing the pharmacology, neuroimaging, and phenomenology profiles of psychedelics (Fig.) reveals a weak one-to-one relationship between the three levels of analysis, which is unsurprising given the highly non-linear, complex, and reciprocalinteractions between them. However, the results of the meta-analyses at each level may reveal some insights into the nature of these interactions. On a superficial level, there do appear to be some direct correspondences between the phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology. Phenomenologically, we only found one significant difference between psychedelics that was consistent across medium and high doses: LSD induces more visionary restructuralisation than psilocybin does. Neurobiologically, LSD enhanced connectivity between the visual network and all other networks more than the other psychedelics. The relationship between the pharmacology results and the above findings is more difficult to establish. Our results show that LSD increases IP formation, whereas DMT and psilocin decrease it. IP formation occurs whenever Gα q proteins are recruited to initiate cellular signalling. Furthermore, there is evidence that Gα q activation is necessary for 5-HT 2A agonists to bring about hallucinogenic effects. When administered the psychedelic (±)1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI), mice that lack the gene for Gα q proteins do not exhibit behaviours (head twitches) that typically indicate hallucinations. More recently, activation of Gα q pathways by 5-HT 2A agonists has been shown to predict head-twitch behaviour, whereas 5-HT 2A agonists that are biased for the β-arrestin2 pathway do not induce head twitches. There appears to be a threshold level of Gα q activation that must be surpassed in order for a 5-HT 2A agonist to induce hallucinogenic effects. Intriguingly, the pro-psychotic properties of drugs can be predicted from the extent to which they increase Gα q activation (relative to a different G-protein pathway) when these drugs interact with a complex formed between the 5-HT 2A receptor and a metabotropic glutamate receptor. In other words, the more that a drug upsets the normal balance of Gα q signalling, the more likely it is to engender hallucinations. However, these studies only establish the presence of hallucinations elicited by Gα q signalling. They do not indicate whether Gα q signalling induces visual hallucinations in particular. Thus, based on the available evidence, we cannot yet conclude that the pharmacology, neuroimaging, and phenomenology literature all convergently indicate that LSD has a uniquely strong effect on visual awareness, compared to the other psychedelics. There do not appear to be any tools at the moment for relating the pharmacology of drugs to the precise nature of the subjective experiences that they produce. Methods for examining the relationship between neuroimaging and phenomenology are currently limited to correlations and linear regressions, which do not capture causality. There is a need to develop techniques for elucidating the causal relationships between phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology. Relating the results of the meta-analysis to the literature Phenomenology. We sought to verify the results of our phenomenology meta-analysis by comparing them to the two experimental studies that measured ASC ratings of LSD and psilocybin in the same group of participants. Holze et al.gave a medium (15 mg) and a high (30 mg) dose of psilocybin, as well as a medium (0.01 mg) and a high (0.02 mg) dose of LSD, and then compared both 5D-and 11D-ASC scores. It is worth noting that the doses of psilocybin and LSD in this study are not equivalent, since 0.01 mg LSD = 20 mg psilocybin. When comparing 15 mg psilocybin to 0.01 mg LSD, mean 5D-ASC and 11D-ASC scores tended to be higher for LSD than psilocybin. However, the only differences that reached significance were in the OB and VR scales for the 5D-ASC analysis, and in the complex imagery and audio-visual synaesthesia subscales for the 11D-ASC analysis. In our meta-analysis, LSD and psilocybin were significantly different in both OB and VR ratings, as well as in complex imagery and audio-visual synaesthesia ratings, at medium doses. Ley et al.compared the subjective effects of medium doses of LSD (0.01 mg) and psilocybin (20 mg). Here, the doses are equivalent, unlike in the previous study. The study found no significant differences between LSD and psilocybin in any of the dimensions, both in the 5D and 11D analyses. Therefore, the results of our meta-analysis are not entirely supported by studies that conducted direct comparisons between psychedelics. Neuroimaging. One major finding in the neuroimaging literature is that psychedelics desegregate and disintegrate brain networks. Segregation is defined as the lack of FC between brain regions, while integration denotes FC within a network. Carhart-Harris et al.found that LSD led to disintegration and desegregation for most RSNs. This finding has been independently confirmed in several other studies. In a review of three studies, Müller, Liechti, et al.found good convergence in reports of desegregation. A recent study, which was published after our meta-analysis was completed, utilised a novel logitudinal precision functional mapping approach, in which participants were scanned 18 times before, during, and after psilocybin administration. It also reported massive decreases in anticorrelations between networks (desegregation), as well as in correlations within networks (disintegration). Our meta-analysis corroborates the desegregation hypothesis and provides mixed support for the disintegration hypothesis. Psychedelics significantly elevated FC between all non-identical pairs of brain networks except the FPN and VAN. Within-network FC significantly decreased for the visual network, VAN, and DMN, yet it significantly increased for the DAN and FPN. The reduction in within-VAN FC and amplification of within-DAN FC may be consistent with the behavioural neurophysiology and phenomenology of psychedelics, respectively. Broadly speaking, the VAN redirects attention to salient stimuli, whereas the DAN is responsible for sustaining attention. In agreement with the VAN FC results, there is some evidence, albeit mixed, that psychedelics reduce mismatch negativity, or the brain's response to surprising stimuli, though the MMN is primarily generated by regions outside the VAN. Whereas closed-eyes mental imagery tends to be very fleeting when people are sober, it is often much more stable and vivid on psychedelics. We speculate that this increase in stability could be attributed to a vast enhancement of the ability to freely allocate attentional resources on psychedelics, as has been proposed in the past. That is, external stimuli typically demand attention, which limits the brain's capacity to freely allocate attention to spontaneously generated, closed-eyes mental imagery. Psychedelics may reduce the competition between external stimuli and closed-eyes mental imagery for sustained attention, which could explain an increase in the within-network FC of the DAN. Intriguingly, ayahuasca and DMT are the only psychedelics to reduce FC between the visual network and the DAN. This could be consistent with the fact that only ayahuasca and DMT appear to give rise to open-eye Fig.Our multi-level analysis of psychedelic effects highlights the nonlinear relationship between their pharmacology, neuroimaging, and phenomenology. The effects of psychedelics form a tripartite hierarchy, consisting of subjective experience (a, phenomenology), functional connectivity (b, neuroimaging), and their selective affinity for receptors (c, pharmacology). Here, we show the neural correlates of each level of the hierarchy in the seven Yeo networks. In brief, each profile was derived from (a) neural correlates of the subjective dimensions of the ASC scale, (b) summing the aggregate FC between each network and other networks, and (c) the distribution of each receptor, weighted by each psychedelic's selectivity for that receptor. Clearly, there is a very weak correspondence between the different levels of the hierarchy, revealing the highly non-linear relationship between phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology. Note: we analysed data on both DMT and ayahuasca in our FC meta-analysis, but only on DMT for the other meta-analyses. We examined data on psilocin in our pharmacology meta-analysis and on psilocybin in both of the other meta-analyses. "breakthrough" experiences, which feature extraordinarily rich and realistic visual hallucinations. Indeed, the loss of connectivity from the visual network, and consequently of visual input from the environment, may make it possible to sustain attention on complex visual hallucinations even while the eyes are open. Meanwhile, increases in connectivity within the FPN could account for the therapeutic effects of psychedelics. The FPN is a network that initiates and flexibly adjusts cognitive control in response to feedback from the environment. Depression compromises executive control and cognitive flexibility; hence, it reduces FC within the FPN. Psilocybin has shown promise for treating depression, and while this metaanalysis was only conducted on data from healthy participants, our finding that psychedelics elevate within-FPN FC may still be able to explain their antidepressant effects. The significant increases in within-FPN and within-DAN FC indicate that the effects of psychedelics on within-network FC are more nuanced than total disintegration across the whole brain. Furthermore, the explanatory power of desegregation and disintegration remains unclear. While there is a correlation between desegregation/disintegration and the subjective experience of ego dissolution, there is no evidence for a causal link. There appear to be parallels between the conscious experience of interconnectedness and the "interconnectedness" of the brain on psychedelics, but further research is needed to demonstrate that the connection between the two is more than merely semantic. Another common finding in the literature is that psychedelics decrease activity and connectivity within the DMN, a network that is generally implicated in self-awareness, self-reflection, and other self-referential cognitive processes [100-103]. This popular 'meme' likely has its origin in the first resting-state fMRI study of a psychedelic, where decreased blood flow and BOLD signal were observed in a pattern of regions resembling the DMN. Eleven years later, evidence continues to indicate that psychedelics potently affect the regularity of population brain activity in DMN regions. Since a commonly reported experience on psychedelics is the dissolution of the self, a phenomenon known as "ego death" [105-107], it would superficially make sense that psychedelics dysregulate the DMN. Many studies have found significant correlations between subjective ratings of ego dissolution and DMN disintegration, though other analyses did not find evidence for a relationship between the two. However, claims of "de-activation" or worse, "shutting-off" of the DMN as signatures of psychedelic action are wrong and misleading. Other neuroimaging studies by Carhart-Harris et al.and Roseman et al.discovered that psychedelics affect the connectivity of the DMN, decreasing within-DMN FC ("disintegration") while increasing DMN coupling with other resting-state networks (RSNs) ("desegregation"). Our neuroimaging meta-analysis confirms that psychedelics significantly decrease connectivity within the DMN while significantly elevating its connectivity with all other networks. Furthermore, the reduction in within-network FC was greater for the DMN than for any other network, though it was not that much larger than that of the visual network. Although we found that LSD increased within-DMN FC, this result is likely attributable to connectivity between regions that are not key hubs of the DMN. Our phenomenology meta-analysis revealed that all psychedelics induced positive experiences of depersonalisation and derealisation, as captured by the oceanic boundlessness dimension of the 5D-ASC scale; these experiences are related to the feeling of ego death. Nevertheless, there are many cases in which within-DMN connectivity may decrease without giving rise to the subjective effects that characterise psychedelics. Several other drugs such as amphetamines and alcohol, as well as drug addiction in general, reduce within-DMN connectivity in humans [115-117], even though they typically do not lead to ego dissolution. Certain psychological states that exacerbate self-rumination, such as maladaptive self-focused attention, are not associated with hyperconnectivity in the DMN, and one study found that some tasks requiring self-related judgments were associated with a suppression of within-DMN connectivity. That being said, a recent meta-analysis of 14 studies did endorse an association between rumination and the DMN. Finally, it is worth noting that a recent systematic review of the neuroimaging literature on psychedelics concluded that it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of the studies, as well as other methodological concerns. Overall, we agree that it is challenging to perform a standard meta-analysis on the psychedelic neuroimaging literature. However, several steps were taken in our analysis to overcome the concerns that Linguiti and colleagues raised. Unlike Linguiti and colleagues, we separated studies on functional connectivity from studies on entropy and BOLD activation. As stated above, the BOLD activation studies subjected participants to such a wide variety of tasks that it was impossible to conduct a meta-analysis on this segment of the literature. However, almost all of the functional connectivity studies that we included in our metaanalysis conducted resting-state recordings. Linguiti and colleagues correctly note that, even among the resting-state recordings, there experimental procedures and analysis methods are very heterogeneous. We ran subgroup analyses to confirm that these covariates, such as route of administration (oral or intravenous), timing of drug administration relative to the duration of the drug's acute effects, and various preprocessing techniques, did not impact the results of our meta-analysis. Linguiti and colleagues also observed that there is a high sample overlap in the published neuroimaging studies; that is, there are many studies that reused or re-analysed data from previously published research. In our meta-analysis, we ensured that we included only one analysis of each unique dataset in the literature. Because of this and other exclusion criteria, we entered data from only 12 studies into our quantitative meta-analysis, whereas Linguiti and colleagues included 91 studies. We do agree with Linguiti and colleagues that at least one of our included studies failed to adequately control for Type I errorand that at least another one did not sufficiently report head motion correction. Nevertheless, overall, we believe that there is enough consistency among some studies in the neuroimaging literature to conduct a meaningful meta-analysis. Pharmacology. The results of our affinity meta-analysis aligned well with studies that performed direct comparisons of selectivity between different psychedelics. In line with our findings, all of these studies showed that LSD is more selective than DMT for 5-HT 2A , relative to 5-HT 1A . Two studies also observed that psilocin is more selective than LSD for 5-HT 2A. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DMT is more selective than LSD for 5-HT 2C , a conclusion that is supported by three of four studies. Note that none of these studies measured the statistical significance of between-drug differences in selectivity. Our findings about functional activity were also congruent with studies that measured the effect of multiple psychedelics on IP formation at the 5-HT 2A receptor [125-127, 129]. We found that LSD's relative activity at this pathway was significantly greater than that of psilocin, which was in turn significantly larger than that of DMT. All four studies showed that LSD had higher relative activity at this pathway than DMT. Two studies also reported that psilocin's relative activity was lower than that of LSD, but larger than that of.
We encourage researchers to develop tools for modelling the nonlinear relationships between the pharmacology, neuroimaging, and phenomenology of psychedelics, the three hierarchical levels of analysis that are at the heart of this meta-analysis. While some researchers have attempted to examine the associations between each level, their techniques are model-free and only measure correlations between the effects of psychedelics, rather than elucidating the causal mechanisms that underpin them. Recent whole-brain models have made significant advances in discovering these causal mechanisms (seefor a general review). Whole-brain models consist of nodes that approximate local or mesoscopic neuronal dynamics through mean field models of coupled excitatory-inhibitory interactionsor Hopf models of bifurcations into and out of sustained oscillatory activity. Crucially, whole-brain models have enabled researchers to identify the specific regions that should be stimulated in order to force transitions between different states of consciousness, such as from sleep to wakefulness. Whole-brain models have also been applied to psychedelics; in particular, the 5-HT 2A receptor density in each area of the brain was used to fit a mean field model of fMRI data on LSD, capturing the nonlinear interactions between connectivity and the distribution of 5-HT 2A receptors. This model was recently extended to determine the associations between global brain connectivity on LSD and categories of subjective experience. The model has also been applied to the relationship between neurotransmitters (namely, serotonin) and neuronal regions on psilocybin; in particular, Kringelbach et al.coupled a mean field model of each neuronal region to the release-and-reuptake dynamics of serotonin concentration. Importantly, this coupled neuronal-neurotransmitter model exhibited a better fit to the empirical FC than a model of solely the neuronal activity. Overall, whole-brain models display great promise for linking neurotransmitter release, which is partly determined by pharmacology, to the brain regions that causally mediate, rather than merely correlate with, the effects of psychedelics. Most recently, whole-brain models have also been combined with another cutting-edge method, turbulence, to determine the susceptibility of the brain to external stimuli under psychedelics. This meta-analysis was only performed on data from healthy participants, yet there is emerging research on the neuroimaging and phenomenology of psychedelics in clinical populations. Future models that bridge the three levels of analysis should also be applied to the clinical data in order to shed light on the therapeutic mechanisms of psychedelics. It is essential to determine whether these models would be able to predict clinical outcomes. Recent research has succeeded in predicting treatment response to psilocybin for depression based on changes in the functional hierarchy of the brain. These methods may be even more effective if they incorporated data on phenomenology and pharmacology. However, as mentioned in the Introduction, psychedelic treatments are always administered in conjunction with therapy or some form of "psychological support," which the models must also take into account.
This is the first meta-analysis of the literature on the phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology of psychedelics. We assess and compare these three hierarchical levels of analysis across three different classical psychedelics: DMT, LSD, and psilocybin. Thus, we performed comparisons not only between psychedelics, but also between the levels of the hierarchy. We found that the different levels of the hierarchy exhibited a weak one-to-one correspondence with one another. This is not surprising, as the interactions between phenomenology, neuroimaging, and pharmacology are highly non-linear and complex. We encourage future research to develop tools for modelling these relationships in order to improve our scientific understanding of psychedelics.
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Yaden, D. B., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Holze, F., Ley, L., Müller, F. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Ley, L., Holze, F., Arikci, D. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Qiu, X., Minda, J. P. · Psyarxiv (2021)
Sanz, C., Zamberlan, F., Erowid, E. et al. · Frontiers in Neuroscience (2018)
Zamberlan, F., Sanz, C., Pallavicini, C. et al. · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Erritzoe, D., Williams, T. et al. · PNAS (2012)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Bolstridge, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2017)
Daws, R. E., Timmermann, C., Giribaldi, B. et al. · Nature Medicine (2022)
Doss, M. K., Považan, M., Rosenberg, M. D. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2021)
Mertens, L. J., Wall, M. B., Roseman, L. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Roseman, L., Demetriou, L., Wall, M. B. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Shanahan, M. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2014)
Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Gonza ´lez-Maeso, J., Weisstaub, N. V., Zhou, M. et al. · Neuron (2007)
López-Giménez, J. F., González-Maeso, J. · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (2017)
Preller, K. H., Herdener, M., Pokorny, T. et al. · Current Biology (2017)
Quednow, B. B., Kometer, M., Geyer, M. A. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2011)
Vollenweider, F. X., Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen, M. F. I., Bäbler, A. et al. · NeuroReport (1998)
Canal, C. E., Murnane, K. S. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Pokorny, T., Preller, K. H., Kraehenmann, R. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2016)
Luan, L. X., Eckernäs, E., Ashton, M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Vogt, S. B., Ley, L., Erne, L. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2023)
Carbonaro, T. M., Hurwitz, E., Johnson, M. W. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Vollenweider, F. X., Csomor, P. A., Knappe, B. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2007)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Muthukumaraswamy, S., Roseman, L. et al. · PNAS (2016)
Bedford, P., Hauke, D. J., Wang, Z. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
Barrett, F. S., Krimmel, S. R., Griffiths, R. R. et al. · NeuroImage (2020)
Rickli, A., Moning, O. D., Hoener, M. C. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2016)
Kringelbach, M. L., Cruzat, J., Cabral, J. et al. · PNAS (2020)
Burt, J. B., Preller, K. H., Demirtaş, M. et al. · eLife (2021)
Barrett, F. S., Doss, M. K., Sepeda, N. D. et al. · Scientific Reports (2020)
Girn, M., Roseman, L., Bernhardt, B. et al. · NeuroImage (2022)
Lebedev, A. V., L€ Ovd En, M., Rosenthal, G. et al. · Human Brain Mapping (2015)
Madsen, M. K., Stenbaek, D. S., Arvidsson, A. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)
Müller, F., Dolder, P. C., Schmidt, A. et al. · NeuroImage (2018)
Roseman, L., Leech, R., Feilding, A. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2014)
Duerler, P., Brem, S., Fraga-González, G. et al. · Cerebral Cortex (2021)
Timmermann, C., Spriggs, M. J., Kaelen, M. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2018)
Kometer, M., Vollenweider, F. X. · Behavioral Neurobiology of Psychedelic Drugs (2016)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2022)
Raison, C. L., Sanacora, G., Woolley, J. D. et al. · JAMA (2023)
Schindowski, E. M., Jungwirth, J., Schuldt, A. et al. · EClinicalMedicine (2023)
Tagliazucchi, E., Roseman, L., Kaelen, M. et al. · Current Biology (2016)
Moreton, S. G., Szalla, L., Menzies, R. E. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Nour, M. R., Evans, J., Nutt, D. J. et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2016)
Atasoy, S., Leor, R., Kaelen, M. et al. · Scientific Reports (2017)
Luppi, A. I., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L. et al. · NeuroImage (2021)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Andrade, K. C., Tófoli, L.F. et al. · PLOS ONE (2015)
Pasquini, L., Palhano-Fontes, F., Araújo, D. B. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2020)
Smigielski, L., Scheidegger, M., Kometer, M. et al. · NeuroImage (2019)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Erritzoe, D. et al. · Schizophrenia Bulletin (2012)
Doss, M. K., May, D. G., Johnson, M. W. et al. · Scientific Reports (2020)
Linguiti, S., Vogel, J. W., Sydnor, V. J. et al. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2023)
Kaelen, M., Roseman, L., Kahan, J. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2016)
Grimm, O., Kraehenmann, R., Preller, K. H. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2018)
Lawn, T., Dipasquale, O., Vamvakas, A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2022)
Deco, G., Cruzat, J., Cabral, J. et al. · Current Biology (2018)
Cruzat, J., Perl, Y. S., Escrichs, A. et al. · Network Neuroscience (2022)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Yacoub, J., Bray, E., Bayyat, J. et al. · Biorxiv (2026)
Jacobs, E., Zahid, Z., Hinkle, J. et al. · BMJ (2026)
Singleton, S. P., Timmermann, C., Luppi, A. I. et al. · Communications Biology (2025)