Methodological challenges in psychedelic drug trials: Efficacy and safety of psilocybin in treatment-resistant major depression (EPIsoDE) - Rationale and study design
This paper (2022) details the rationale and study design for an upcoming double-blind placebo-controlled trial (n=144) which will assess the safety and efficacy of using psilocybin in a cohort with treatment-resistant depression.
Authors
- Lea Mertens
- Henrik Jungaberle
- Gerhard Gründer
Published
Abstract
Psychedelics such as psilocybin have recently gained remarkable interest in both the specialist literature and the lay press because studies suggest that these substances may have great therapeutic potential in various psychiatric disorders, including major depression. However, clinical trials with psychedelic drugs pose particular methodological challenges to researchers, some of which differ considerably from those with other psychotropic drugs. These include the problem of successful blinding, which can hardly be guaranteed in clinical trials with psychedelic substances and - directly related - the high risk of expectation bias and nocebo effects. Some of these challenges are being addressed in the given clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of psilocybin in treatment-resistant major depression. It is a phase II randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled parallel-group trial with 144 patients. The rationale, the study design, and the core features of the study are presented here. The trial (EPIsoDE trial; EudraCT number: 2019-003984-24; NCT04670081) is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01EN2006 A/B).
Research Summary of 'Methodological challenges in psychedelic drug trials: Efficacy and safety of psilocybin in treatment-resistant major depression (EPIsoDE) - Rationale and study design'
Introduction
Classical psychedelics, a group of serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) agonists that includes psilocybin and LSD, have re-emerged in psychiatric research because several recent studies suggest therapeutic potential for major depression, treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and some substance use disorders. Mertens and colleagues note that most published trials to date have important methodological limitations: many are open-label or uncontrolled, sample sizes have generally been small (double digits), and only one available double-blind trial lacked sufficient power and assay sensitivity. The unique subjective effects of psychedelics also create trial-specific problems such as difficulty maintaining blinding and high risk of expectation bias and nocebo effects in control arms. This paper presents the rationale and protocol for the EPIsoDE trial, a Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled parallel-group study designed to examine the efficacy and safety of oral psilocybin in TRD (EudraCT 2019-003984-24; NCT04670081). The investigators frame the trial to address several of the methodological challenges that complicate clinical assessment of psychedelics, and they propose design features (for example the choice of comparators and repeated dosing) that they suggest could serve as prototypes for future trials in this area.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics
- Authors
- APA Citation
Mertens, L. J., Koslowski, M., Betzler, F., Evens, R., Gilles, M., Jungaberle, A., Jungaberle, H., Majić, T., Ströhle, A., Wolff, M., Wellek, S., & Gründer, G. (2022). Methodological challenges in psychedelic drug trials: Efficacy and safety of psilocybin in treatment-resistant major depression (EPIsoDE) - Rationale and study design. Neuroscience Applied, 1, 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nsa.2022.100104
References (18)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J. M. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Bogenschutz, M. P., Forcehimes, A. A., Pommy, J. A. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Cameron, L. P., Tombari, R. J., Lu, J. et al. · Nature (2020)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, M., Rucker, J. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Giribaldi, B., Watts, R. et al. · New England Journal of Medicine (2021)
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., May, D. G. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2021)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2011)
Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Gründer, G., Jungaberle, H., Gründer, G. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2021)
Show all 18 referencesShow fewer
Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R. · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (2016)
Kaelen, M., Giribaldi, B., Raine, J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2018)
Mertens, L. J., Preller, K. H. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2021)
Mithoefer, A. T., Mithoefer, M. C., Feduccia, A. A. et al. · Lancet Psychiatry (2018)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M., Idialu-Ikato, K. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2019)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Rucker, J., Iliff, J., Nutt, D. J. · Neuropharmacology (2017)
Cited By (3)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Stellmacher, J., Schmidt, C., Aicher, H. D. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2026)
Mertens, L. J., Koslowski, M., Betzler, F. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2026)
Rodgers, A., Bahceci, D., Davey, C. G. et al. · Australian and new-zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2023)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.