The influence of ceremonial settings on mystical and challenging experiences occasioned by ayahuasca: A survey among ritualistic and religious ayahuasca users
In a survey of 2,751 ritualistic and religious ayahuasca users, higher ratings on setting dimensions—particularly social, comfort, infrastructure and decoration—were associated with fewer challenging experiences (explaining 41% of CEQ variance), whereas associations with mystical experiences were weaker (leadership and comfort explained 14% of MEQ variance). Ratings varied by tradition (União do Vegetal reported higher social ratings; infrastructure, comfort and decoration related more to mystical experiences in neo‑shamanic groups), and the SQAE is proposed as a tool to monitor setting effects and guide ritual design to reduce challenging experiences and support mystical ones.
Authors
- Luiz Tófoli
- Johannes Ramaekers
- Kim Oorsouw
Published
Abstract
Recent studies have recognized the importance of non-pharmacological factors such as setting to induce or promote mystical experiences or challenging experiences among ayahuasca users. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the setting in which ayahuasca is consumed and the intensity of mystical and challenging experiences considering three ayahuasca using traditions (União do Vegetal, Santo Daime and neo-shamanic groups). A cross-sectional analysis was performed on survey data collected online from 2,751 participants. The Setting Questionnaire for the Ayahuasca Experience (SQAE) was used to evaluate six dimensions of the setting characteristics. The Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) and the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) were used to quantify the psychedelic experience. Ratings on every SQAE setting dimension were negatively correlated with ratings of the CEQ (r values between 0.21 and 0.36) for all ayahuasca using traditions. Regression analysis revealed that ratings on four SQAE dimensions (Social, Comfort, Infrastructure and Decoration) explained 41% of the variance in CEQ ratings. Associations between SQAE and MEQ ratings were relatively weak and confined to the dimensions Leadership and Comfort, explaining 14% of the variance in MEQ ratings. Ratings of Social context were higher among members of União do Vegetal compared to Santo Daime and neo-shamanic members. Ratings of Infrastructure, Comfort and Decoration were more consistently correlated with MEQ in the neoshamanic tradition compared to the other traditions. This study shows that the setting is an important moderator of a challenging experience under ayahuasca. Maximizing the quality of the setting in which ayahuasca is taken will reduce the chance of a challenging experience while contributing positively to a mystical experience. The present findings can be considered when designing rituals and the (social) environment of ayahuasca ceremonies, and indicate that the SQAE questionnaire can be employed to monitor the influence of ceremonial settings on the ayahuasca experience.
Research Summary of 'The influence of ceremonial settings on mystical and challenging experiences occasioned by ayahuasca: A survey among ritualistic and religious ayahuasca users'
Introduction
Recent research recognises that non‑pharmacological factors — especially set and setting — moderate the subjective effects of psychedelics, including ayahuasca. Ayahuasca is a DMT‑ and β‑carboline‑containing decoction used in a variety of ritual and religious contexts (notably União do Vegetal (UDV), Santo Daime, and neo‑shamanic groups). Prior work suggests that ritual elements such as music, leadership and the physical environment may facilitate mystical experiences (characterised by unity, sacredness, ineffability and peace) or, conversely, affect the risk of challenging experiences (e.g. fear, paranoia, dissociation), but empirical characterisation of which specific setting elements matter is limited. The researchers set out to examine associations between multiple dimensions of ceremonial setting and the intensity of mystical and challenging experiences reported after recent ayahuasca use across three traditions (UDV, Santo Daime and neo‑shamanic). They applied a recently developed Setting Questionnaire for the Ayahuasca Experience (SQAE) alongside established measures of mystical (MEQ‑30) and challenging (CEQ) experiences, analysing cross‑sectional online survey data to identify which setting dimensions predict mystical and/or challenging outcomes and whether these relationships differ by tradition.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Journal
- Compound
- Topic
- Authors
- APA Citation
Pontual, A. A. D. D., Tófoli, L. F., Corradi-Webster, C. M., van Oorsouw, K., Delgado, A. R. O., & Ramaekers, J. G. (2022). The influence of ceremonial settings on mystical and challenging experiences occasioned by ayahuasca: A survey among ritualistic and religious ayahuasca users. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857372
References (23)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Bradstreet, M. P., Leoutsakos, J. M. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Barrett, F. S., Preller, K. H., Kaelen, M. · International Review of Psychiatry (2018)
Carbonaro, T. M., Bradstreet, M. P., Barrett, F. S. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Haijen, E. C. H. M. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
Cohen, S. · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1980)
Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R., Johnson, M. W. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2015)
González, D., Cantillo, J., Perez, I. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2021)
Haijen, E. C. H. M., Kaelen, M., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Hartogsohn, I. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Show all 23 referencesShow fewer
Hartogsohn, I. · Drug Science Policy and Law (2017)
Hartogsohn, I. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2021)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Kettner, H., Rosas, F. E., Timmermann, C. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2021)
Leary, T., Litwin, G. H., Metzner, R. · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1977)
MacLean, K. A., Leoutsakos, J. S., Johnson, M. W. et al. · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2012)
Palhano-Fontes, F., Andrade, K. C., Tófoli, L.F. et al. · PLOS ONE (2015)
Riba, J., Urbano, G., Morte, A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2001)
Richards, W. A. · Archive for the Psychology of Religion (2008)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Dos Santos, R. G., Osório, F. L., Crippa, J. A. et al. · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology (2016)
Thomas, G., Lucas, P., Rielle Capler, N. et al. · Current Drug Abuse Reviews (2013)
Trope, A., Anderson, B. T., Hooker, A. R. et al. · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (2019)
Cited By (7)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Perkins, D., Halman, A., Urokohara, A. et al. · Scientific Reports (2025)
Meling, D., Egger, K., Aicher, H. D. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2024)
Cherniak, A. D., Mikulincer, M., Brulin, J. G. et al. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2024)
Levin, A. W., Lancelotta, R., Sepeda, N. D. et al. · PLOS ONE (2024)
Pronovost-Morgan, C., Hartogsohn, I., Ramaekers, J. G. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2023)
Turkia, M. · Psyarxiv (2023)
Bohn, A., Kiggen, M. H. H., Uthaug, M. V. et al. · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion (2022)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.