Dose-response relationships of psilocybin-induced subjective experiences in humans
This meta-analysis of controlled studies using standard questionnaires found a positive dose–response between oral psilocybin and most subjective effects—particularly perceptual alterations and positively experienced ego dissolution—whereas challenging experiences showed little dose dependence. The findings, derived from pooled laboratory data, provide reference dose–response estimates for experimental and clinical research but may not generalise to recreational settings.
Authors
- Hirschfeld, T.
- Schmidt, T. T.
Published
Abstract
Background
Psilocybin is the psychoactive component in Psilocybe mushrooms (‘magic mushrooms’). Whether and how the quality of the psilocybin-induced experience might mediate beneficial health outcomes is currently under investigation, for example, in therapeutic applications. However, to date, no meta-analysis has investigated the dose-dependency of subjective experiences across available studies.
Aim
Establishing dose–response relationships of the subjective experiences induced by psilocybin in healthy study participants and a comparison of patient groups.
Method
We applied a linear meta-regression approach, based on the robust variance estimation framework, to obtain linear dose–response relationship estimates on questionnaire ratings after oral psilocybin administration. Data were obtained from the Altered States Database, which contains data extracted from MEDLINE-listed journal articles that used standardized and validated questionnaires: the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale, the Mystical Experience Questionnaire and the Hallucinogen Rating Scale.
Results
Psilocybin dose positively correlated with ratings on most factors and scales, mainly those referring to perceptual alterations and positively experienced ego dissolution. Measures referring to challenging experiences exhibited small effects and were barely modulated by dose.
Conclusion
Psilocybin intensified almost all characteristics of altered states of consciousness assessed with the given questionnaires. Because subjective experiences are not only determined by dose, but also by individual and environmental factors, the results may only apply to controlled laboratory experiments and not to recreational use. This paper may serve as a general literature citation for the use of psilocybin in experimental and clinical research, to compare expected and observed subjective experiences.
Research Summary of 'Dose-response relationships of psilocybin-induced subjective experiences in humans'
Introduction
Psilocybin, the primary psychoactive component of Psilocybe mushrooms, produces altered states of consciousness (ASC) through agonism at 5-HT2A receptors. Previous research has linked the phenomenological quality of psilocybin-induced experiences — including mystical-type experiences and ego-dissolution — to positive changes in mood and therapeutic outcomes in several clinical contexts. Despite growing interest in whether the subjective experience itself mediates therapeutic benefits, no meta-analysis had quantified how subjective effects scale with psilocybin dose across studies using standardised psychometric instruments. Hirschfeld and Schmidt set out to estimate dose-response relationships for psilocybin-induced subjective experiences measured with validated questionnaires in controlled, oral-administration studies. The primary aim was to derive linear dose-response estimates across multiple psychometric scales using the Altered States Database (ASDB) and a meta-regression approach suited to dependent effect sizes; a secondary aim was to explore whether including available patient data changed those dose-response patterns. The authors frame these estimates as a reference for experimental and clinical dose selection while noting non-pharmacological influences on subjective effects.
Expert Research Summaries
Go Pro to access AI-powered section-by-section summaries, editorial takes, and the full research toolkit.
Full Text PDF
Full Paper PDF
Create a free account to open full-text PDFs.
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Journal
- Compound
- Topic
- APA Citation
Hirschfeld, T., & Schmidt, T. T. (2021). Dose-response relationships of psilocybin-induced subjective experiences in humans. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 35(4), 384-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881121992676
References (48)
Papers cited by this study that are also in Blossom
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2015)
Barrett, F. S., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Personality and Individual Differences (2017)
Barsuglia, J. P., Davis, A. K., Palmer, R. et al. · Frontiers in Psychology (2018)
Bernasconi, F. ;., Schmidt, A. ;., Pokorny, T. ;. et al. · Cerebral Cortex (2013)
Brown, R. T., Nicholas, C. R., Cozzi, N. V. et al. · Clinical Pharmacokinetics (2017)
Carbonaro, T. M., Hurwitz, E., Johnson, M. W. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Williams, T. M., Sessa, B. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2010)
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Bolstridge, &. M., Day, C. M. J. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2017)
Carter, O., Burr, D. C., Pettigrew, J. D. et al. · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2006)
Carter, O. L., Hasler, F. ;., Pettigrew, J. D. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2007)
Show all 48 referencesShow fewer
Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E., Heekeren, K., Neukirch, A. et al. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2005)
Griffiths, R. R., Richards, W. A., Mccann, U. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2006)
Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Grob, C. S., Danforth, A. L., Chopra, G. S. et al. · JAMA Psychiatry (2011)
Haijen, E. C. H. M., Kaelen, M., Roseman, L. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Hartogsohn, I. · Drug Science Policy and Law (2017)
Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2008)
Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Cosimano, M. P. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2014)
Johnson, M. W., Garcia-Romeu, A., Griffiths, R. R. · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (2016)
Kometer, M., Schmidt, A., Bachmann, R. et al. · Biological Psychiatry (2012)
Leary, T., Litwin, G. H., Metzner, R. · Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1977)
Lewis, C. R., Preller, K. H., Braden, B. B. et al. · Biomedicines (2020)
Liechti, M. E. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
Maclean, K. A., Johnson, M. W., Griffiths, R. R. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2011)
MacLean, K. A., Leoutsakos, J. S., Johnson, M. W. et al. · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (2012)
Madsen, M. K., Fisher, P. M., Stenbæk, D. S. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
Majic, T., Schmidt, T. T., Gallinat, J. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2015)
Nicholas, C. R., Henriquez, K. M., Gassman, M. C. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2018)
King, C., Nichols, D. E. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2013)
Pokorny, T., Preller, K. H., Kraehenmann, R. et al. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2016)
Pokorny, T., Preller, K. H., Kometer, M. et al. · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (2017)
Preller, K. H., Pokorny, D., Hock, A. et al. · PNAS (2016)
Quednow, B. B., Kometer, M., Geyer, M. A. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2011)
Roseman, L., Nutt, D. J., Carhart-Harris, R. L. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2018)
Ross, S., Bossis, A. P., Guss, J. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2016)
Russ, S. L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Maruyama, G. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Russ, S. L., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Maruyama, G. et al. · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice (2019)
Schmidt, A., Kometer, M., Bachmann, R. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2012)
Smigielski, L., Kometer, M., Scheidegger, M. et al. · Human Brain Mapping (2020)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Vollenweider, F. X. · PLOS ONE (2010)
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M. et al. · PLOS ONE (2012)
Tylš, F., Páleníček, T., Horacek, J. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2013)
Uthaug, M. V., Lancelotta, R., Szabo, A. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2019)
Vollenweider, F. X., Kometer, M. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2010)
Vollenweider, F. X., Preller, K. H. · Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2020)
Vollenweider, F. X., Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen, M. F. I., Bäbler, A. et al. · NeuroReport (1998)
Vollenweider, F. X., Csomor, P. A., Knappe, B. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2007)
Wittmann, M., Carter, O., Hasler, F. et al. · Journal of Psychopharmacology (2007)
Cited By (22)
Papers in Blossom that reference this study
Kirlić, N., Atli, M., Mistry, S. et al. · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (2025)
Calnan, M., Blest-Hopley, G., Busch, C. et al. · Brain and Behavior (2025)
Kugel, J., Laukkonen, R., Yaden, D. B. et al. · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (2025)
Stoliker, D., Novelli, L., Khajehnejad, M. et al. · Biorxiv (2025)
Goodwin, G. M., Aaronson, S. T., Alvarez, O. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2025)
Sabé, M., Sulstarova, A., Glangetas, A. et al. · Molecular Psychiatry (2024)
Swanson, L. R., Jungers, S., Varghese, R. et al. · Journal of Vision (2024)
Vizeli, P., Studerus, E., Holze, F. et al. · Translational Psychiatry (2024)
Nicholas, C. R., Horton, D. M., Malicki, J. et al. · Psychedelic Medicine (2023)
Haikazian, S., Chen-Li, D., Johnson, D. et al. · Psychiatry Research (2023)
Show all 22 papersShow fewer
Pereira, L. · European Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Goodwin, G. M., Croal, M., Feifel, D. et al. · Neuropharmacology (2023)
Prugger, J., Hirschfeld, T., Majic, T. et al. · Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
Modlin, N. L., Miller, T. M., Rucker, J. J. et al. · Journal of Affective Disorders (2023)
Prugger, J., Derdiyok, E., Dinkelacker, J. et al. · Scientific Data (2022)
Gandy, S. · Journal of Psychedelic Studies (2022)
McCulloch, D. E-W., Madsen, M. K., Jensen, P. S. et al. · Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022)
Vollenweider, F. X., Smallridge, J. W. · Pharmacopsychiatry (2022)
Dursun, S. M., Kelly, J. R., Gillan, C. M. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Avram, M., Rogg, H., Korda, A. et al. · Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Holze, F., Caluori, T. V., Vizeli, P. et al. · Psychopharmacology (2021)
Hirschfeld, T., Smit-Rigter, L., Van Der Gouwe, D. et al. · Current Addiction Reports (2021)
Your Personal Research Library
Go Pro to save papers, add notes, rate studies, and organize your research into custom shelves.